Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11375v2
• Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:38:37 GMT
• Title: Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?
• Authors: Siyu Yuan, Cheng Jiayang, Lin Qiu, Deqing Yang,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how analogies created by teacher language models (LMs) can assist student LMs in understanding scientific concepts. Our results suggest that free-form analogies can indeed aid LMs in understanding concepts.
• Score: 12.164449420121189
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Analogical reasoning plays a critical role in human cognition, enabling us to understand new concepts by associating them with familiar ones. Previous research in the AI community has mainly focused on identifying and generating analogies and then examining their quality under human evaluation, which overlooks the practical application of these analogies in real-world settings. Inspired by the human education process, in this paper, we propose to investigate how analogies created by teacher language models (LMs) can assist student LMs in understanding scientific concepts, thereby aligning more closely with practical scenarios. Our results suggest that free-form analogies can indeed aid LMs in understanding concepts. Additionally, analogies generated by student LMs can improve their own performance on scientific question answering, demonstrating their capability to use analogies for self-learning new knowledge. Resources are available at https://github.com/siyuyuan/SCUA.

Related papers

• Modeling Understanding of Story-Based Analogies Using Large Language Models [1.4999444543328293]
  Recent advancements in Large Language Models have brought them closer to matching human cognition across a variety of tasks.<n>How well do these models align with human performance in detecting and mapping analogies?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T03:40:21Z)
• LLMs as Models for Analogical Reasoning [14.412456982731467]
  Analogical reasoning is fundamental to human cognition and learning. Recent studies have shown that large language models can sometimes match humans in analogical reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T20:07:37Z)
• "Like a Nesting Doll": Analyzing Recursion Analogies Generated by CS Students using Large Language Models [5.162225137921625]
  A good analogy can bridge the gap between unfamiliar concepts and familiar ones, providing an engaging way to aid understanding. We investigate what extent large language models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT, can provide access to personally relevant analogies on demand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T14:01:26Z)
• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Why Do We Need Neuro-symbolic AI to Model Pragmatic Analogies? [6.8107181513711055]
  A hallmark of intelligence is the ability to use a familiar domain to make inferences about a less familiar domain, known as analogical reasoning. We discuss analogies at four distinct levels of complexity: lexical analogies, syntactic analogies, semantic analogies, and pragmatic analogies. We employ Neuro-symbolic AI techniques that combine statistical and symbolic AI, informing the representation of unstructured text to highlight and augment relevant content, provide abstraction and guide the mapping process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T21:13:38Z)
• Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable Scientific Analogies after Structure Abduction [46.2032673640788]
  The vital role of analogical reasoning in human cognition allows us to grasp novel concepts by linking them with familiar ones through shared relational structures. This work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook the structures that underpin these analogies. This paper introduces a task of analogical structure abduction, grounded in cognitive psychology, designed to abduce structures that form an analogy between two systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T03:04:06Z)
• ANALOGYKB: Unlocking Analogical Reasoning of Language Models with A Million-scale Knowledge Base [51.777618249271725]
  ANALOGYKB is a million-scale analogy knowledge base derived from existing knowledge graphs (KGs) It identifies two types of analogies from the KGs: 1) analogies of the same relations, which can be directly extracted from the KGs, and 2) analogies of analogous relations, which are identified with a selection and filtering pipeline enabled by large language models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T09:03:01Z)
• Understanding Narratives through Dimensions of Analogy [17.68704739786042]
  Analogical reasoning is a powerful tool that enables humans to connect two situations, and to generalize their knowledge from familiar to novel situations. Modern scalable AI techniques with the potential to reason by analogy have been only applied to the special case of proportional analogy. In this paper, we aim to bridge the gap by: 1) formalizing six dimensions of analogy based on mature insights from Cognitive Science research, 2) annotating a corpus of fables with each of these dimensions, and 3) defining four tasks with increasing complexity that enable scalable evaluation of AI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T20:56:26Z)
• Learning to Scaffold: Optimizing Model Explanations for Teaching [74.25464914078826]
  We train models on three natural language processing and computer vision tasks. We find that students trained with explanations extracted with our framework are able to simulate the teacher significantly more effectively than ones produced with previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:43:39Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.