HARE: HumAn pRiors, a key to small language model Efficiency
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11410v2
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:59:03 GMT
- Title: HARE: HumAn pRiors, a key to small language model Efficiency
- Authors: Lingyun Zhang, Bin jin, Gaojian Ge, Lunhui Liu, Xuewen Shen, Mingyong Wu, Houqian Zhang, Yongneng Jiang, Shiqi Chen, Shi Pu,
- Abstract summary: Human priors play a crucial role in efficiently utilizing data in deep learning.
Existing Small Language Models mainly rely on web-scraped large-scale training data.
We propose a principle to leverage human priors for data construction.
- Score: 6.253561984966316
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Human priors play a crucial role in efficiently utilizing data in deep learning. However, with the development of large language models (LLMs), there is an increasing emphasis on scaling both model size and data volume, which often diminishes the importance of human priors in data construction. Influenced by these trends, existing Small Language Models (SLMs) mainly rely on web-scraped large-scale training data, neglecting the proper incorporation of human priors. This oversight limits the training efficiency of language models in resource-constrained settings. In this paper, we propose a principle to leverage human priors for data construction. This principle emphasizes achieving high-performance SLMs by training on a concise dataset that accommodates both semantic diversity and data quality consistency, while avoiding benchmark data leakage. Following this principle, we train an SLM named HARE-1.1B. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmark datasets demonstrate that HARE-1.1B performs favorably against state-of-the-art SLMs, validating the effectiveness of the proposed principle. Additionally, this provides new insights into efficient language model training in resource-constrained environments from the view of human priors.
Related papers
- Dynamic Loss-Based Sample Reweighting for Improved Large Language Model Pretraining [55.262510814326035]
Existing reweighting strategies primarily focus on group-level data importance.
We introduce novel algorithms for dynamic, instance-level data reweighting.
Our framework allows us to devise reweighting strategies deprioritizing redundant or uninformative data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T17:57:15Z) - Correcting Large Language Model Behavior via Influence Function [44.090990384733324]
The dynamic nature of human preferences can render some prior training data outdated or even erroneous.
We propose a novel approach, Large Language Model Behavior Correction with Influence Function Recall and Post-Training (LANCET)
LANCET consists of two phases: (1) using influence functions to identify the training data that significantly impact undesirable model outputs, and (2) applying an Influence function-driven Bregman Optimization (IBO) technique to adjust the model's behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T02:50:08Z) - Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
Learn-Focus-Review (LFR) is a dynamic training approach that adapts to the model's learning progress.
LFR tracks the model's learning performance across data blocks (sequences of tokens) and prioritizes revisiting challenging regions of the dataset.
Compared to baseline models trained on the full datasets, LFR consistently achieved lower perplexity and higher accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z) - Data Shapley in One Training Run [88.59484417202454]
Data Shapley provides a principled framework for attributing data's contribution within machine learning contexts.
Existing approaches require re-training models on different data subsets, which is computationally intensive.
This paper introduces In-Run Data Shapley, which addresses these limitations by offering scalable data attribution for a target model of interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T17:09:24Z) - Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and
Overoptimization in RLHF [79.98542868281471]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a technique that aligns language models closely with human-centric values.
It is observed that the performance of the reward model degrades after one epoch of training, and optimizing too much against the learned reward model eventually hinders the true objective.
This paper delves into these issues, leveraging the theoretical insights to design improved reward learning algorithm termed 'Iterative Data Smoothing' (IDS)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:43:42Z) - Federated Learning for Early Dropout Prediction on Healthy Ageing
Applications [0.0]
We present a federated machine learning (FML) approach that minimizes privacy concerns and enables distributed training, without transferring individual data.
Our results show that data selection and class imbalance handling techniques significantly improve the predictive accuracy of models trained under FML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-08T13:17:06Z) - To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs.
We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting.
Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z) - INGENIOUS: Using Informative Data Subsets for Efficient Pre-Training of
Language Models [40.54353850357839]
We show how we can employ submodular optimization to select highly representative subsets of the training corpora.
We show that the resulting models achieve up to $sim99%$ of the performance of the fully-trained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T09:24:41Z) - Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's
`Factual' Predictions [59.284907093349425]
Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models.
We provide a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework.
Our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-28T17:36:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.