Gender Differences in Class Participation in Online versus In-Person Core CS Courses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11864v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:36:36 GMT
• Title: Gender Differences in Class Participation in Online versus In-Person Core CS Courses
• Authors: Madison Brigham, Joël Porquet-Lupine,
• Abstract summary: Shift to primarily asynchronous online learning has impacted the gender gap in student participation scores and students' attitudes towards themselves and their peers. Males score higher on average and dominate the top scores while in online classes, male and female students participate at approximately the same rate classwide. Female participation habits in typical in-person classes are not inherent gender differences, but rather, a product of the environment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered how post-secondary students receive their education. Namely, the transition from an in-person to an online class format changed how students interact with their instructors and their classmates. In this paper, we use student participation scores from two core computer science classes across ten in-person and three online quarters at a public research university to analyze whether the shift to primarily asynchronous online learning has impacted the gender gap in student participation scores and students' attitudes towards themselves and their peers. We observe a shift on the online class forum: in in-person classes, males score higher on average and dominate the top scores while in online classes, male and female students participate at approximately the same rate classwide. To understand what might be driving changes in participation behavior, we analyze survey responses from over a quarter of the students enrolled in the online classes. While we find that students of both genders tend to compare themselves to their peers less when classes are online, we also find that this trend is much more accentuated for females than males. This data suggests that observed female participation habits in typical in-person classes are not inherent gender differences, but rather, a product of the environment. Therefore, it is critical the community investigates the root causes of these behavioral differences, and experiments with ways to mitigate them, before we soon return to an in-person format.

Related papers

• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs [0.0]
  We analyze a heterogeneous knowledge graph consisting of students, course videos, formative assessments and their interactions to predict student performance. We then compare the models generated between 5 on-campus and 2 fully-online MOOC-style instances of the same course. The model developed achieved a 70-90% accuracy of predicting whether a student would pass a particular problem set based on content consumed, course instance, and modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T03:33:59Z)
• Detecting Gender Bias in Course Evaluations [0.0]
  We use different methods to examine and explore the data and find differences in what students write about courses depending on gender of the examiner. Data from English and Swedish courses are evaluated and compared, in order to capture more nuance in the gender bias that might be found.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T11:35:05Z)
• How are Primary School Computer Science Curricular Reforms Contributing to Equity? Impact on Student Learning, Perception of the Discipline, and Gender Gaps [0.7896843467339624]
  Early exposure to Computer Science (CS) for all is critical to broaden participation and promote equity in the field. But how does introducting CS into primary school curricula impact learning, perception, and gaps between groups of students? We investigate a CS-curricular reform and teacher Professional Development (PD) program from an equity standpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:42:26Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Are Commercial Face Detection Models as Biased as Academic Models? [64.71318433419636]
  We compare academic and commercial face detection systems, specifically examining robustness to noise. We find that state-of-the-art academic face detection models exhibit demographic disparities in their noise robustness. We conclude that commercial models are always as biased or more biased than an academic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T02:21:42Z)
• Improving Teacher-Student Interactions in Online Educational Forums using a Markov Chain based Stackelberg Game Model [5.004814662623874]
  We propose an analytical model based on continuous time Markov chains (CTMCs) to capture instructor-student interactions in an online forum (OEF) We observe that students exhibit varied degree of non-monotonicity in their participation with increasing instructor involvement. Our model exhibits the empirically observed super-poster phenomenon under certain parameter configurations and recommends an optimal plan to the instructor for maximizing student participation in OEFs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T09:48:20Z)
• Self-Training with Differentiable Teacher [80.62757989797095]
  Self-training achieves enormous success in various semi-supervised and weakly-supervised learning tasks. The method can be interpreted as a teacher-student framework, where the teacher generates pseudo-labels, and the student makes predictions. We propose ours, short for differentiable self-training, that treats teacher-student as a Stackelberg game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T02:06:13Z)
• Social Interactions Clustering MOOC Students: An Exploratory Study [57.822523354358665]
  Comments were categorized based on how students interacted with them, e.g., how a student's comment received replies from peers. Statistical modelling and machine learning were used to analyze comment categorization, resulting in 3 strong and stable clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T09:32:38Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.