MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12549v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:26:09 GMT
• Title: MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Texts
• Authors: Dominik Macko, Jakub Kopal, Robert Moro, Ivan Srba,
• Abstract summary: MultiSocial dataset contains 472,097 texts, of which about 58k are human-written. We use this benchmark to compare existing detection methods in zero-shot as well as fine-tuned form. Our results indicate that the fine-tuned detectors have no problem to be trained on social-media texts.
• Score: 0.6053347262128919
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent LLMs are able to generate high-quality multilingual texts, indistinguishable for humans from authentic human-written ones. Research in machine-generated text detection is however mostly focused on the English language and longer texts, such as news articles, scientific papers or student essays. Social-media texts are usually much shorter and often feature informal language, grammatical errors, or distinct linguistic items (e.g., emoticons, hashtags). There is a gap in studying the ability of existing methods in detection of such texts, reflected also in the lack of existing multilingual benchmark datasets. To fill this gap we propose the first multilingual (22 languages) and multi-platform (5 social media platforms) dataset for benchmarking machine-generated text detection in the social-media domain, called MultiSocial. It contains 472,097 texts, of which about 58k are human-written and approximately the same amount is generated by each of 7 multilingual LLMs. We use this benchmark to compare existing detection methods in zero-shot as well as fine-tuned form. Our results indicate that the fine-tuned detectors have no problem to be trained on social-media texts and that the platform selection for training matters.

Related papers

• GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
  In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck. Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts. Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize AI-generated intervals within text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z)
• SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection [68.858931667807]
  Subtask A is a binary classification task determining whether a text is written by a human or generated by a machine. Subtask B is to detect the exact source of a text, discerning whether it is written by a human or generated by a specific LLM. Subtask C aims to identify the changing point within a text, at which the authorship transitions from human to machine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T13:56:07Z)
• MENTOR: Multilingual tExt detectioN TOward leaRning by analogy [59.37382045577384]
  We propose a framework to detect and identify both seen and unseen language regions inside scene images. "MENTOR" is the first work to realize a learning strategy between zero-shot learning and few-shot learning for multilingual scene text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T03:35:17Z)
• KInIT at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Fine-tuned LLMs for Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection [0.0]
  SemEval-2024 Task 8 is focused on multigenerator, multidomain, and multilingual black-box machine-generated text detection. Our submitted method achieved competitive results, ranking at the fourth place, just under 1 percentage point behind the winner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T10:09:56Z)
• M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection [69.41274756177336]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought an unprecedented surge in machine-generated text (MGT) across diverse channels. This raises legitimate concerns about its potential misuse and societal implications. We introduce a new benchmark based on a multilingual, multi-domain, and multi-generator corpus of MGTs -- M4GT-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:50:33Z)
• MULTITuDE: Large-Scale Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmark [10.92793962395538]
  MultiTuDE is a novel benchmarking dataset for multilingual machine-generated text detection. It consists of 74,081 authentic and machine-generated texts in 11 languages. We compare the performance of zero-shot (statistical and black-box) and fine-tuned detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T15:57:17Z)
• M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection [69.29017069438228]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries. This has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia. In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:55:11Z)
• MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection. We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z)
• A Simple and Efficient Probabilistic Language model for Code-Mixed Text [0.0]
  We present a simple probabilistic approach for building efficient word embedding for code-mixed text. We examine its efficacy for the classification task using bidirectional LSTMs and SVMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T05:37:57Z)
• Semi-automatic Generation of Multilingual Datasets for Stance Detection in Twitter [9.359018642178917]
  This paper presents a method to obtain multilingual datasets for stance detection in Twitter. We leverage user-based information to semi-automatically label large amounts of tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T13:05:09Z)
• BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation [42.34923623457615]
  Bias in Open-Ended Language Generation dataset consists of 23,679 English text generation prompts. An examination of text generated from three popular language models reveals that the majority of these models exhibit a larger social bias than human-written Wikipedia text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T22:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.