Is It Good Data for Multilingual Instruction Tuning or Just Bad Multilingual Evaluation for Large Language Models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12822v2
• Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:37:24 GMT
• Title: Is It Good Data for Multilingual Instruction Tuning or Just Bad Multilingual Evaluation for Large Language Models?
• Authors: Pinzhen Chen, Simon Yu, Zhicheng Guo, Barry Haddow,
• Abstract summary: Large language models, particularly multilingual ones, are designed, claimed, and expected to cater to native speakers of varied languages. We hypothesise that the current practices of fine-tuning and evaluating these models may not perfectly align with this objective owing to a heavy reliance on translation. It remains unknown whether the nature of the instruction data has an impact on the model output; conversely, it is questionable whether translated test sets can capture such nuances.
• Score: 17.011882550422452
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models, particularly multilingual ones, are designed, claimed, and expected to cater to native speakers of varied languages. We hypothesise that the current practices of fine-tuning and evaluating these models may not perfectly align with this objective owing to a heavy reliance on translation, which can introduce translation artefacts and defects. It remains unknown whether the nature of the instruction data has an impact on the model output; conversely, it is questionable whether translated test sets can capture such nuances. Due to the often coupled practices of using translated data in both stages, such imperfections could have been overlooked. This work investigates these issues using controlled native or translated data during instruction tuning and evaluation stages. Experiments on eight base models and eight different benchmarks show that native or generation benchmarks reveal a notable difference between native and translated instruction data especially when model performance is high, whereas other types of test sets cannot. The comparison between round-trip and single-pass translations reflects the importance of knowledge from language-native resources. Finally, we demonstrate that regularization is beneficial to bridging this gap on structured but not generative tasks.

Related papers

• Using Machine Translation to Augment Multilingual Classification [0.0]
  We explore the effects of using machine translation to fine-tune a multilingual model for a classification task across multiple languages. We show that translated data are of sufficient quality to tune multilingual classifiers and that this novel loss technique is able to offer some improvement over models tuned without it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T00:31:59Z)
• Beyond Contrastive Learning: A Variational Generative Model for Multilingual Retrieval [109.62363167257664]
  We propose a generative model for learning multilingual text embeddings. Our model operates on parallel data in $N$ languages. We evaluate this method on a suite of tasks including semantic similarity, bitext mining, and cross-lingual question retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:41:40Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for Check-worthy Claim Identification over Twitter [7.601937548486356]
  Misinformation spread over social media has become an undeniable infodemic. We present a systematic study of six approaches for cross-lingual check-worthiness estimation across pairs of five diverse languages with the help of Multilingual BERT (mBERT) model. Our results show that for some language pairs, zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is possible and can perform as good as monolingual models that are trained on the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:18:53Z)
• Detecting Languages Unintelligible to Multilingual Models through Local Structure Probes [15.870989191524094]
  We develop a general approach that requires only unlabelled text to detect which languages are not well understood by a cross-lingual model. Our approach is derived from the hypothesis that if a model's understanding is insensitive to perturbations to text in a language, it is likely to have a limited understanding of that language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T16:45:16Z)
• BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing [55.058258437125524]
  We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing. We benchmark eight language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API. Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or surpass state-of-the-art methods for syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T18:34:11Z)
• Cross-Lingual Fine-Grained Entity Typing [26.973783464706447]
  We present a unified cross-lingual fine-grained entity typing model capable of handling over 100 languages. We analyze this model's ability to generalize to languages and entities unseen during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T03:22:30Z)
• Language Models are Few-shot Multilingual Learners [66.11011385895195]
  We evaluate the multilingual skills of the GPT and T5 models in conducting multi-class classification on non-English languages. We show that, given a few English examples as context, pre-trained language models can predict not only English test samples but also non-English ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T03:08:22Z)
• When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Exploration [71.43817945875433]
  proper handling of discourse significantly contributes to the quality of machine translation (MT) Recent works in context-aware MT attempt to target a small set of discourse phenomena during evaluation. We develop the Multilingual Discourse-Aware benchmark, a series of taggers that identify and evaluate model performance on discourse phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T17:29:30Z)
• Specializing Multilingual Language Models: An Empirical Study [50.7526245872855]
  Contextualized word representations from pretrained multilingual language models have become the de facto standard for addressing natural language tasks. For languages rarely or never seen by these models, directly using such models often results in suboptimal representation or use of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T18:13:55Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.