IWISDM: Assessing instruction following in multimodal models at scale
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14343v5
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:25:19 GMT
- Title: IWISDM: Assessing instruction following in multimodal models at scale
- Authors: Xiaoxuan Lei, Lucas Gomez, Hao Yuan Bai, Pouya Bashivan,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the instructed-Virtual VISual Decision Making (iWISDM) environment engineered to generate a limitless array of vision-language tasks.
Using iWISDM, we compiled three distinct benchmarks of instruction following visual tasks across varying complexity levels.
Our findings establish iWISDM as a robust benchmark for assessing the instructional adherence of both existing and emergent multimodal models.
- Score: 1.2320972303448239
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The ability to perform complex tasks from detailed instructions is a key to many remarkable achievements of our species. As humans, we are not only capable of performing a wide variety of tasks but also very complex ones that may entail hundreds or thousands of steps to complete. Large language models and their more recent multimodal counterparts that integrate textual and visual inputs have achieved unprecedented success in performing complex tasks. Yet, most existing benchmarks are largely confined to single-modality inputs (either text or vision), narrowing the scope of multimodal assessments, particularly for instruction-following in multimodal contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce the instructed-Virtual VISual Decision Making (iWISDM) environment engineered to generate a limitless array of vision-language tasks of varying complexity. Using iWISDM, we compiled three distinct benchmarks of instruction following visual tasks across varying complexity levels and evaluated several newly developed multimodal models on these benchmarks. Our findings establish iWISDM as a robust benchmark for assessing the instructional adherence of both existing and emergent multimodal models and highlight a large gap between these models' ability to precisely follow instructions with that of humans.The code of iWISDM is available on GitHub at https://github.com/BashivanLab/iWISDM.
Related papers
- Needle In A Multimodal Haystack [79.81804334634408]
We present the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents.
Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning.
We observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T13:09:16Z) - Uni-MoE: Scaling Unified Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Experts [54.529880848937104]
We develop a unified MLLM with the MoE architecture, named Uni-MoE, that can handle a wide array of modalities.
Specifically, it features modality-specific encoders with connectors for a unified multimodal representation.
We evaluate the instruction-tuned Uni-MoE on a comprehensive set of multimodal datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-18T12:16:01Z) - Multi-modal Semantic Understanding with Contrastive Cross-modal Feature
Alignment [11.897888221717245]
This paper proposes a novel CLIP-guided contrastive-learning-based architecture to perform multi-modal feature alignment.
Our model is simple to implement without using task-specific external knowledge, and thus can easily migrate to other multi-modal tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T01:07:36Z) - Generative Multimodal Models are In-Context Learners [60.50927925426832]
We introduce Emu2, a generative multimodal model with 37 billion parameters, trained on large-scale multimodal sequences.
Emu2 exhibits strong multimodal in-context learning abilities, even emerging to solve tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T18:59:58Z) - MM-BigBench: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Multimodal Content
Comprehension Tasks [56.60050181186531]
We introduce MM-BigBench, which incorporates a diverse range of metrics to offer an extensive evaluation of the performance of various models and instructions.
Our paper evaluates a total of 20 language models (14 MLLMs) on 14 multimodal datasets spanning 6 tasks, with 10 instructions for each task, and derives novel insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T11:57:04Z) - On the Performance of Multimodal Language Models [4.677125897916577]
This study conducts a comparative analysis of different multimodal instruction tuning approaches.
We reveal key insights for guiding architectural choices when incorporating multimodal capabilities into large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T23:33:36Z) - D$^2$TV: Dual Knowledge Distillation and Target-oriented Vision Modeling
for Many-to-Many Multimodal Summarization [113.72253589338472]
Many-to-many multimodal summarization (M$3$S) task aims to generate summaries in any language with document inputs in any language and the corresponding image sequence.
We propose a dual knowledge distillation and target-oriented vision modeling framework for the M$3$S task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T06:47:35Z) - OFASys: A Multi-Modal Multi-Task Learning System for Building Generalist
Models [72.8156832931841]
Generalist models are capable of performing diverse multi-modal tasks in a task-agnostic way within a single model.
We release a generalist model learning system, OFASys, built on top of a declarative task interface named multi-modal instruction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T17:07:09Z) - Learning Modality-Specific Representations with Self-Supervised
Multi-Task Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis [11.368438990334397]
We develop a self-supervised learning strategy to acquire independent unimodal supervisions.
We conduct extensive experiments on three public multimodal baseline datasets.
Our method achieves comparable performance than human-annotated unimodal labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T14:05:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.