Enhancing reliability in prediction intervals using point forecasters: Heteroscedastic Quantile Regression and Width-Adaptive Conformal Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14904v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 06:51:13 GMT
• Title: Enhancing reliability in prediction intervals using point forecasters: Heteroscedastic Quantile Regression and Width-Adaptive Conformal Inference
• Authors: Carlos Sebastián, Carlos E. González-Guillén, Jesús Juan,
• Abstract summary: We argue that, when evaluating a set of intervals, traditional measures alone are insufficient. The intervals must vary in length, with this variation directly linked to the difficulty of the prediction. We propose the Heteroscedastic Quantile Regression (HQR) model and the Width-Adaptive Conformal Inference ( WACI) method.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Building prediction intervals for time series forecasting problems presents a complex challenge, particularly when relying solely on point predictors, a common scenario for practitioners in the industry. While research has primarily focused on achieving increasingly efficient valid intervals, we argue that, when evaluating a set of intervals, traditional measures alone are insufficient. There are additional crucial characteristics: the intervals must vary in length, with this variation directly linked to the difficulty of the prediction, and the coverage of the interval must remain independent of the difficulty of the prediction for practical utility. We propose the Heteroscedastic Quantile Regression (HQR) model and the Width-Adaptive Conformal Inference (WACI) method, providing theoretical coverage guarantees, to overcome those issues, respectively. The methodologies are evaluated in the context of Electricity Price Forecasting and Wind Power Forecasting, representing complex scenarios in time series forecasting. The results demonstrate that HQR and WACI not only improve or achieve typical measures of validity and efficiency but also successfully fulfil the commonly ignored mentioned characteristics.

Related papers

• Deconfounding Time Series Forecasting [1.5967186772129907]
  Time series forecasting is a critical task in various domains, where accurate predictions can drive informed decision-making. Traditional forecasting methods often rely on current observations of variables to predict future outcomes. We propose an enhanced forecasting approach that incorporates representations of latent confounders derived from historical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T12:45:42Z)
• JANET: Joint Adaptive predictioN-region Estimation for Time-series [28.19630729432862]
  We propose JANET (Joint Adaptive predictioN-region Estimation for Time-series), a novel framework for constructing conformal prediction regions. JANET generalises the inductive conformal framework and efficiently produces joint prediction regions with controlled K-familywise error rates. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates JANET's superior performance in multi-step prediction tasks across diverse time series datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T21:03:15Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs. We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint. We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Performative Time-Series Forecasting [71.18553214204978]
  We formalize performative time-series forecasting (PeTS) from a machine-learning perspective. We propose a novel approach, Feature Performative-Shifting (FPS), which leverages the concept of delayed response to anticipate distribution shifts. We conduct comprehensive experiments using multiple time-series models on COVID-19 and traffic forecasting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T18:34:29Z)
• Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasts [73.33395097728128]
  We provide the first systematic finite-sample study of proper scoring rules for time-series forecasting evaluation. We carry out our analysis on a comprehensive synthetic benchmark, specifically designed to test several key discrepancies between ground-truth and forecast distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T17:38:42Z)
• Improving Adaptive Conformal Prediction Using Self-Supervised Learning [72.2614468437919]
  We train an auxiliary model with a self-supervised pretext task on top of an existing predictive model and use the self-supervised error as an additional feature to estimate nonconformity scores. We empirically demonstrate the benefit of the additional information using both synthetic and real data on the efficiency (width), deficit, and excess of conformal prediction intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:57:14Z)
• Conformal prediction set for time-series [16.38369532102931]
  Uncertainty quantification is essential to studying complex machine learning methods. We develop Ensemble Regularized Adaptive Prediction Set (ERAPS) to construct prediction sets for time-series. We show valid marginal and conditional coverage by ERAPS, which also tends to yield smaller prediction sets than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T23:48:53Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
  We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based. We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory. Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.