An Integration of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15498v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:57:05 GMT
• Title: An Integration of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms
• Abstract summary: The purpose of this thesis is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. The proposed integrated trust mechanism was validated by conducting experiment with buyer/seller scenario in auction system.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Due to popularization of internet and e-commerce, more and more people getting involved in online shopping market. A large number of companies have been transferred to the internet where online customers have been increased due to easy access. The online business facilitates people to communicate without knowing each other. The e-commerce systems are the combination of commerce behavior and internet technologies. Therefore, trust aspects are positive elements in buyer-seller transactions and a potential source of competitive e-commerce industry. There are two different approaches to handle the trust. The first approach has a solid authentication set of rules where decisions are made on some digital or logical rules called policy based trust mechanism. The second approach is a decentralized trust approach where reputation assembled and shared in distributed environment called reputation based trust mechanism. Objectives: In this thesis, the strengths and weaknesses of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms have been identified through systematic literature review and industrial interviews. Furthermore, the process of integrated trust mechanism has been proposed. The integrated trust mechanism is proposed through mapping process, weakness of one mechanism with the strength of other. The proposed integrated trust mechanism was validated by conducting experiment with buyer/seller scenario in auction system. The analysis of collected results indicated that proposed integrated trust mechanism improved the trust of buyer against eBay and Tradera. At the end, we have discussed some key points that may affect trust relationship between seller and buyer. Furthermore, there is a need for further validation of proposed trust mechanism in auction system/e-commerce industry.

Related papers

• Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions [47.65093774088672]
  This survey and tutorial article reviews the literature over the period 1980--2026 on the evolution from classical multi-agent systems to open agent networks.<n>We first review this evolution and show how the trust boundary expands from individual execution to cross-agent, cross-platform, and cross-organizational interaction.<n>We develop a five-dimensional taxonomy covering entity and capability trust, authorization and delegation trust, information and trust, coordination and group-robustness trust, and accountability and settlement trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T09:32:35Z)
• Ties of Trust: a bowtie model to uncover trustor-trustee relationships in LLMs [1.1149261035759372]
  We introduce a bowtie model for conceptualizing and formulating trust in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>A core component comprehensively explores trust by tying its two sides, namely the trustor and the trustee, as well as their intricate relationships.<n>We uncover these relationships within the proposed bowtie model and beyond to its sociotechnical ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T11:42:52Z)
• Rethinking Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review [16.774993642353724]
  Trust is a fundamental concept in human decision-making and collaboration. Software engineering articles often use the term 'trust' informally. Without a common definition, true secondary research on trust is impossible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T19:52:21Z)
• Fostering Trust and Quantifying Value of AI and ML [0.0]
  Much has been discussed about trusting AI and ML inferences, but little has been done to define what that means. producing ever more trustworthy machine learning inferences is a path to increase the value of products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T13:25:28Z)
• Integration of Policy and Reputation based Trust Mechanisms in e-Commerce Industry [0.0]
  The e-commerce industry is currently handling two different trust approaches. The difference between reputation and policy based trust mechanism will be analyzed. recommendations would be proposed to increase trust between buyer and seller in e-commerce industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T07:47:48Z)
• Empirical Evaluation of Integrated Trust Mechanism to Improve Trust in E-commerce Services [0.0]
  We analyze the impact of integrated trust mechanism in three different e-commerce services. The model selected for the experiment is a composite of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. experiment has been supervised to validate the effectiveness of implementation by segregating both integrated and traditional trust mechanisms in learning system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T07:38:51Z)
• Towards Trust and Reputation as a Service in a Blockchain-based Decentralized Marketplace [0.9217021281095907]
  We propose a novel trust and reputation service for a decentralized marketplace. Our service was inspired by Laplace Law of Succession, where trust in a seller is defined as the probability that she will fulfill her obligations. We show how to predict trust and reputation far in the future, based on incomplete information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T04:44:56Z)
• A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty [52.44939679369428]
  Modern NLP systems are often uncalibrated, resulting in confidently incorrect predictions that undermine user trust. We study the evolution of user trust in response to trust-eroding events using a betting game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:41:46Z)
• Distributed Trust Through the Lens of Software Architecture [13.732161898452377]
  This paper will survey the concept of distributed trust in multiple disciplines. It will take a system/software architecture point of view to look at trust redistribution/shift and the associated tradeoffs in systems and applications enabled by distributed trust technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T06:53:18Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Where Does Trust Break Down? A Quantitative Trust Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Trust Matrix and Conditional Trust Densities [94.65749466106664]
  We introduce the concept of trust matrix, a novel trust quantification strategy. A trust matrix defines the expected question-answer trust for a given actor-oracle answer scenario. We further extend the concept of trust densities with the notion of conditional trust densities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T14:33:43Z)
• How Much Can We Really Trust You? Towards Simple, Interpretable Trust Quantification Metrics for Deep Neural Networks [94.65749466106664]
  We conduct a thought experiment and explore two key questions about trust in relation to confidence. We introduce a suite of metrics for assessing the overall trustworthiness of deep neural networks based on their behaviour when answering a set of questions. The proposed metrics are by no means perfect, but the hope is to push the conversation towards better metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T17:37:36Z)
• Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless - justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
  Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks. We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities. We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.