Empirical Evaluation of Integrated Trust Mechanism to Improve Trust in E-commerce Services

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13299v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 07:38:51 GMT
• Title: Empirical Evaluation of Integrated Trust Mechanism to Improve Trust in E-commerce Services
• Abstract summary: We analyze the impact of integrated trust mechanism in three different e-commerce services. The model selected for the experiment is a composite of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. experiment has been supervised to validate the effectiveness of implementation by segregating both integrated and traditional trust mechanisms in learning system.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There are mostly two approaches to tackle trust management worldwide Strong and crisp and Soft and Social. We analyze the impact of integrated trust mechanism in three different e-commerce services. The trust aspect is a dormant element between potential users and being developed expert or internet systems. We support our integration by preside over an experiment in controlled laboratory environment. The model selected for the experiment is a composite of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms and widely acknowledged in e-commerce industry. The integration between policy and trust mechanism was accomplished through mapping process, weakness of one brought to a close with the strength of other. Furthermore, experiment has been supervised to validate the effectiveness of implementation by segregating both integrated and traditional trust mechanisms in learning system

Related papers

• Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
  Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z)
• Trust-Based Incentive Mechanisms in Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning Systems [0.0]
  In federated learning (FL), decentralized model training allows multi-ple participants to collaboratively improve a shared machine learning model without exchanging raw data.<n>This paper proposes a novel trust-based incentive mechanism designed to evaluate and reward the quality of contributions in FL systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T05:47:51Z)
• Ev-Trust: A Strategy Equilibrium Trust Mechanism for Evolutionary Games in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Services [4.184213789790897]
  Ev-Trust is a strategy-equilibrium trust mechanism grounded in evolutionary game theory.<n>Within a decentralized "Request-Response-Payment-Evaluation" service framework, Ev-Trust enables agents to adaptively adjust strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T04:39:13Z)
• Attention Knows Whom to Trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [52.57826440085856]
  Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving complex tasks but remain vulnerable when agents receive unreliable messages.<n>This vulnerability stems from a fundamental gap: LLM agents treat all incoming messages equally without evaluating their trustworthiness.<n>We propose Attention Trust Score (A-Trust), a lightweight, attention-based method for evaluating message trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:32:57Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective [333.9220561243189]
  Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. Their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions. This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:20:36Z)
• An Integration of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms [0.0]
  The purpose of this thesis is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. The proposed integrated trust mechanism was validated by conducting experiment with buyer/seller scenario in auction system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T08:57:05Z)
• Integration of Policy and Reputation based Trust Mechanisms in e-Commerce Industry [0.0]
  The e-commerce industry is currently handling two different trust approaches. The difference between reputation and policy based trust mechanism will be analyzed. recommendations would be proposed to increase trust between buyer and seller in e-commerce industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T07:47:48Z)
• Enhancing Mutual Trustworthiness in Federated Learning for Data-Rich Smart Cities [29.951569327998133]
  Federated learning is a promising collaborative and privacy-preserving machine learning approach in data-rich smart cities. Traditional approaches, such as the random client selection technique, poses several threats to the system's integrity. We propose a novel framework that addresses the mutual trustworthiness in federated learning by considering the trust needs of both the client and the server.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T08:49:22Z)
• A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty [52.44939679369428]
  Modern NLP systems are often uncalibrated, resulting in confidently incorrect predictions that undermine user trust. We study the evolution of user trust in response to trust-eroding events using a betting game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:41:46Z)
• Did You Mean...? Confidence-based Trade-offs in Semantic Parsing [52.28988386710333]
  We show how a calibrated model can help balance common trade-offs in task-oriented parsing. We then examine how confidence scores can help optimize the trade-off between usability and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:07:26Z)
• Trust, but Verify: Using Self-Supervised Probing to Improve Trustworthiness [29.320691367586004]
  We introduce a new approach of self-supervised probing, which enables us to check and mitigate the overconfidence issue for a trained model. We provide a simple yet effective framework, which can be flexibly applied to existing trustworthiness-related methods in a plug-and-play manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T08:57:20Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• On the Importance of Trust in Next-Generation Networked CPS Systems: An AI Perspective [2.1055643409860734]
  We propose trust as a measure to evaluate the status of network agents and improve the decision-making process. Trust relations are based on evidence created by the interactions of entities within a protocol. We show how utilizing the trust evidence can improve the performance and the security of Federated Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T02:12:13Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Where Does Trust Break Down? A Quantitative Trust Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Trust Matrix and Conditional Trust Densities [94.65749466106664]
  We introduce the concept of trust matrix, a novel trust quantification strategy. A trust matrix defines the expected question-answer trust for a given actor-oracle answer scenario. We further extend the concept of trust densities with the notion of conditional trust densities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T14:33:43Z)
• How Much Can We Really Trust You? Towards Simple, Interpretable Trust Quantification Metrics for Deep Neural Networks [94.65749466106664]
  We conduct a thought experiment and explore two key questions about trust in relation to confidence. We introduce a suite of metrics for assessing the overall trustworthiness of deep neural networks based on their behaviour when answering a set of questions. The proposed metrics are by no means perfect, but the hope is to push the conversation towards better metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T17:37:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.