Integration of Policy and Reputation based Trust Mechanisms in e-Commerce Industry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13303v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 07:47:48 GMT
• Title: Integration of Policy and Reputation based Trust Mechanisms in e-Commerce Industry
• Abstract summary: The e-commerce industry is currently handling two different trust approaches. The difference between reputation and policy based trust mechanism will be analyzed. recommendations would be proposed to increase trust between buyer and seller in e-commerce industry.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The e-commerce systems are being tackled from commerce behavior and internet technologies. Therefore, trust aspect between buyer-seller transactions is a potential element which needs to be addressed in competitive e-commerce industry. The e-commerce industry is currently handling two different trust approaches. First approach consists on centralized mechanism where digital credentials/set of rules assembled, called Policy based trust mechanisms . Second approach consists on decentralized trust mechanisms where reputation, points assembled and shared, called Reputation based trust mechanisms. The difference between reputation and policy based trust mechanism will be analyzed and recommendations would be proposed to increase trust between buyer and seller in e-commerce industry. The integration of trust mechanism is proposed through mapping process, strength of one mechanism with the weakness of other. The proposed model for integrated mechanism will be presented and illustrated how the proposed model will be used in real world e-commerce industry.

Related papers

• Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions [47.65093774088672]
  This survey and tutorial article reviews the literature over the period 1980--2026 on the evolution from classical multi-agent systems to open agent networks.<n>We first review this evolution and show how the trust boundary expands from individual execution to cross-agent, cross-platform, and cross-organizational interaction.<n>We develop a five-dimensional taxonomy covering entity and capability trust, authorization and delegation trust, information and trust, coordination and group-robustness trust, and accountability and settlement trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T09:32:35Z)
• A game theory for foundation models shows new paths to rational cooperation through similarity inference [56.53805518668248]
  We show that foundation model agents engaging in optimal planning consistently converge to stable cooperation.<n>By shifting from decoupled to embedded agency, these agents model themselves as part of the universe they inhabit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:24:33Z)
• Bit-politeia: An AI Agent Community in Blockchain [6.579039107070663]
  "Bit-politeia" is an AI agent community on blockchain designed to construct a fair, efficient, and sustainable resource allocation system.<n>By leveraging AI for objective assessment and decentralized verification, Bit-politeia minimizes human bias and mitigates resource centralization issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-01T17:26:54Z)
• From Competition to Coordination: Market Making as a Scalable Framework for Safe and Aligned Multi-Agent LLM Systems [5.165179548592513]
  We introduce a market-making framework for multi-agent large language model (LLM) coordination.<n>In this setup, each agent acts as a market participant, updating and trading probabilistic beliefs, to converge toward shared, truthful outcomes.<n> Empirically, we evaluate this approach across factual reasoning, ethical judgment, and commonsense inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T16:47:15Z)
• Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading [57.28635022507172]
  TiMi is a rationality-driven multi-agent system that architecturally decouples strategy development from minute-level deployment.<n>We propose a two-tier analytical paradigm from macro patterns to micro customization, layered programming design for trading bot implementation, and closed-loop optimization driven by mathematical reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T13:08:55Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems. Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Causality Is Key to Understand and Balance Multiple Goals in Trustworthy ML and Foundation Models [91.24296813969003]
  This paper advocates integrating causal methods into machine learning to navigate the trade-offs among key principles of trustworthy ML. We argue that a causal approach is essential for balancing multiple competing objectives in both trustworthy ML and foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:57:33Z)
• On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective [333.9220561243189]
  Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. Their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions. This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:20:36Z)
• An Integration of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms [0.0]
  The purpose of this thesis is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. The proposed integrated trust mechanism was validated by conducting experiment with buyer/seller scenario in auction system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T08:57:05Z)
• Empirical Evaluation of Integrated Trust Mechanism to Improve Trust in E-commerce Services [0.0]
  We analyze the impact of integrated trust mechanism in three different e-commerce services. The model selected for the experiment is a composite of policy and reputation based trust mechanisms. experiment has been supervised to validate the effectiveness of implementation by segregating both integrated and traditional trust mechanisms in learning system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T07:38:51Z)
• Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges [1.9624273277521183]
  The transition from centralized to decentralized trust mechanisms plays a critical role in shaping the cryptocurrency ecosystem. This study contributes significantly to interdisciplinary research, bridging distributed systems, behavioral finance, and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) It offers valuable insights for the distributed computing community, particularly in understanding and applying distributed trust mechanisms in digital economies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T07:58:05Z)
• Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
  We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible. Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z)
• Zero Trust for Cyber Resilience [13.343937277604892]
  This chapter draws attention to the cyber resilience within the zero-trust model. We introduce the evolution from traditional perimeter-based security to zero trust and discuss their difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T16:53:20Z)
• Distributed Trust Through the Lens of Software Architecture [13.732161898452377]
  This paper will survey the concept of distributed trust in multiple disciplines. It will take a system/software architecture point of view to look at trust redistribution/shift and the associated tradeoffs in systems and applications enabled by distributed trust technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T06:53:18Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)
• Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless - justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
  Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks. We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities. We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.