Can Large Language Models Understand DL-Lite Ontologies? An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17532v2
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:03:07 GMT
• Title: Can Large Language Models Understand DL-Lite Ontologies? An Empirical Study
• Authors: Keyu Wang, Guilin Qi, Jiaqi Li, Songlin Zhai,
• Abstract summary: Large models (LLMs) have shown significant achievements in solving a wide range of tasks. We empirically analyze the LLMs' capability of understanding Description Logic (DL-Lite) We find that LLMs understand formal syntax and model-theoretic semantics of concepts and roles.
• Score: 10.051572826948762
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant achievements in solving a wide range of tasks. Recently, LLMs' capability to store, retrieve and infer with symbolic knowledge has drawn a great deal of attention, showing their potential to understand structured information. However, it is not yet known whether LLMs can understand Description Logic (DL) ontologies. In this work, we empirically analyze the LLMs' capability of understanding DL-Lite ontologies covering 6 representative tasks from syntactic and semantic aspects. With extensive experiments, we demonstrate both the effectiveness and limitations of LLMs in understanding DL-Lite ontologies. We find that LLMs can understand formal syntax and model-theoretic semantics of concepts and roles. However, LLMs struggle with understanding TBox NI transitivity and handling ontologies with large ABoxes. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide more insights into LLMs and inspire to build more faithful knowledge engineering solutions.

Related papers

• LUK: Empowering Log Understanding with Expert Knowledge from Large Language Models [32.938862271579424]
  This paper introduces a novel knowledge enhancement framework, called LUK, which acquires expert knowledge from LLMs to empower log understanding on a smaller PLM. LUK achieves state-of-the-art results on different log analysis tasks and extensive experiments demonstrate expert knowledge from LLMs can be utilized more effectively to understand logs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T13:58:34Z)
• LLMs' Understanding of Natural Language Revealed [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are the result of a massive experiment in bottom-up, data-driven reverse engineering of language at scale. We will focus on testing LLMs for their language understanding capabilities, their supposed forte.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T01:21:11Z)
• Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRL [78.80673954827773]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play a crucial role in capturing structured semantics to enhance language understanding, improve interpretability, and reduce bias. We propose using Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) as a fundamental task to explore LLMs' ability to extract structured semantics. We find interesting potential: LLMs can indeed capture semantic structures, and scaling-up doesn't always mirror potential. We are surprised to discover that significant overlap in the errors is made by both LLMs and untrained humans, accounting for almost 30% of all errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T11:44:05Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• When LLMs Meet Cunning Texts: A Fallacy Understanding Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.84769254832941]
  We propose a FaLlacy Understanding Benchmark (FLUB) containing cunning texts that are easy for humans to understand but difficult for models to grasp. Specifically, the cunning texts that FLUB focuses on mainly consist of the tricky, humorous, and misleading texts collected from the real internet environment. Based on FLUB, we investigate the performance of multiple representative and advanced LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T22:12:53Z)
• Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective [38.07611356855978]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to breakthroughs in language tasks, yet the internal mechanisms that enable their remarkable generalization and reasoning abilities remain opaque. This paper aims to uncover the mechanisms underlying LLM functionality through the lens of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:46:06Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• Towards Vision Enhancing LLMs: Empowering Multimodal Knowledge Storage and Sharing in LLMs [72.49064988035126]
  We propose an approach called MKS2, aimed at enhancing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) Specifically, we introduce the Modular Visual Memory, a component integrated into the internal blocks of LLMs, designed to store open-world visual information efficiently. Our experiments demonstrate that MKS2 substantially augments the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in contexts necessitating physical or commonsense knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T12:29:20Z)
• Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well. Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries. We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z)
• Limits for Learning with Language Models [4.20859414811553]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) are unable to learn concepts beyond the first level of the Borel Hierarchy. LLMs will continue to operate without formal guarantees on tasks that require entailments and deep linguistic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T12:11:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.