ResumeAtlas: Revisiting Resume Classification with Large-Scale Datasets and Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18125v2
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:19:28 GMT
• Title: ResumeAtlas: Revisiting Resume Classification with Large-Scale Datasets and Large Language Models
• Authors: Ahmed Heakl, Youssef Mohamed, Noran Mohamed, Aly Elsharkawy, Ahmed Zaky,
• Abstract summary: We curated a large-scale dataset of 13,389 resumes from diverse sources. We employed Large Language Models (LLMs) such as BERT and Gemma1.1 2B for classification. Our results demonstrate significant improvements over traditional machine learning approaches.
• Score: 0.9237437350215897
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The increasing reliance on online recruitment platforms coupled with the adoption of AI technologies has highlighted the critical need for efficient resume classification methods. However, challenges such as small datasets, lack of standardized resume templates, and privacy concerns hinder the accuracy and effectiveness of existing classification models. In this work, we address these challenges by presenting a comprehensive approach to resume classification. We curated a large-scale dataset of 13,389 resumes from diverse sources and employed Large Language Models (LLMs) such as BERT and Gemma1.1 2B for classification. Our results demonstrate significant improvements over traditional machine learning approaches, with our best model achieving a top-1 accuracy of 92\% and a top-5 accuracy of 97.5\%. These findings underscore the importance of dataset quality and advanced model architectures in enhancing the accuracy and robustness of resume classification systems, thus advancing the field of online recruitment practices.

Related papers

• Training Data for Large Language Model [2.1178416840822027]
  ChatGPT surpassed previous models in terms of parameters and the scale of its pretraining corpus. ChatGPT achieved revolutionary performance improvements through fine-tuning on a vast amount of high-quality, human-annotated data. This paper summarizes the current state of pretraining and fine-tuning data for training large-scale language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T11:09:58Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimation [56.13803674092712]
  We propose an industrial-friendly, expert-aligned and diversity-preserved instruction data selection method: Clustering and Ranking (CaR) CaR employs a two-step process: first, it ranks instruction pairs using a high-accuracy (84.25%) scoring model aligned with expert preferences; second, it preserves dataset diversity through clustering. In our experiment, CaR efficiently selected a mere 1.96% of Alpaca's IT data, yet the resulting AlpaCaR model surpassed Alpaca's performance by an average of 32.1% in GPT-4 evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T09:27:29Z)
• Improving Classification Performance With Human Feedback: Label a few, we label the rest [2.7386128680964408]
  This paper focuses on understanding how a continuous feedback loop can refine models, thereby enhancing their accuracy, recall, and precision. We benchmark this approach on the Financial Phrasebank, Banking, Craigslist, Trec, Amazon Reviews datasets to prove that with just a few labeled examples, we are able to surpass the accuracy of zero shot large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T19:13:05Z)
• MISS: Multiclass Interpretable Scoring Systems [13.902264070785986]
  We present a machine-learning approach for constructing Multiclass Interpretable Scoring Systems (MISS) MISS is a fully data-driven methodology for single, sparse, and user-friendly scoring systems for multiclass classification problems. Results indicate that our approach is competitive with other machine learning models in terms of classification performance metrics and provides well-calibrated class probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T10:57:12Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Contrastive Vision-Text Models [61.783728119255365]
  We propose to equip vision-text models with the ability to refine their embedding with cross-modal retrieved information from a memory at inference time. Remarkably, we show that this can be done with a light-weight, single-layer, fusion transformer on top of a frozen CLIP. Our experiments validate that our retrieval-enhanced contrastive (RECO) training improves CLIP performance substantially on several challenging fine-grained tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T15:52:02Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• ESimCSE Unsupervised Contrastive Learning Jointly with UDA Semi-Supervised Learning for Large Label System Text Classification Mode [4.708633772366381]
  The ESimCSE model efficiently learns text vector representations using unlabeled data to achieve better classification results. UDA is trained using unlabeled data through semi-supervised learning methods to improve the prediction performance of the models and stability. adversarial training techniques FGM and PGD are used in the model training process to improve the robustness and reliability of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T03:44:23Z)
• Teacher Guided Training: An Efficient Framework for Knowledge Transfer [86.6784627427194]
  We propose the teacher-guided training (TGT) framework for training a high-quality compact model. TGT exploits the fact that the teacher has acquired a good representation of the underlying data domain. We find that TGT can improve accuracy on several image classification benchmarks and a range of text classification and retrieval tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-14T10:33:58Z)
• Complementary Ensemble Learning [1.90365714903665]
  We derive a technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models. Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T03:23:05Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Self-training for Text Classification with Few Labels [54.13279574908808]
  We study self-training as one of the earliest semi-supervised learning approaches to reduce the annotation bottleneck. We propose an approach to improve self-training by incorporating uncertainty estimates of the underlying neural network. We show our methods leveraging only 20-30 labeled samples per class for each task for training and for validation can perform within 3% of fully supervised pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T08:13:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.