Assessing "Implicit" Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18134v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:38:24 GMT
• Title: Assessing "Implicit" Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models
• Authors: Xiaoyu Shen, Rexhina Blloshmi, Dawei Zhu, Jiahuan Pei, Wei Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the "implicit" retrieval robustness of various large language models. Fine-tuning on a mix of gold and distracting context significantly enhances the model's robustness to retrieval inaccuracies. This suggests that large language models can implicitly handle relevant or irrelevant retrieved context by learning solely from the supervision of the final answer.
• Score: 17.006566708461346
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation has gained popularity as a framework to enhance large language models with external knowledge. However, its effectiveness hinges on the retrieval robustness of the model. If the model lacks retrieval robustness, its performance is constrained by the accuracy of the retriever, resulting in significant compromises when the retrieved context is irrelevant. In this paper, we evaluate the "implicit" retrieval robustness of various large language models, instructing them to directly output the final answer without explicitly judging the relevance of the retrieved context. Our findings reveal that fine-tuning on a mix of gold and distracting context significantly enhances the model's robustness to retrieval inaccuracies, while still maintaining its ability to extract correct answers when retrieval is accurate. This suggests that large language models can implicitly handle relevant or irrelevant retrieved context by learning solely from the supervision of the final answer in an end-to-end manner. Introducing an additional process for explicit relevance judgment can be unnecessary and disrupts the end-to-end approach.

Related papers

• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Trustworthy Alignment of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning [84.94709351266557]
  We focus on the trustworthiness of language models with respect to retrieval augmentation. We deem that retrieval-augmented language models have the inherent capabilities of supplying response according to both contextual and parametric knowledge. Inspired by aligning language models with human preference, we take the first step towards aligning retrieval-augmented language models to a status where it responds relying merely on the external evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:25:21Z)
• Think-then-Act: A Dual-Angle Evaluated Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.2134014920850364]
  Large language models (LLMs) often face challenges such as temporal misalignment and generating hallucinatory content. We propose a dual-angle evaluated retrieval-augmented generation framework textitThink-then-Act'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T20:51:34Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented LMs with a Two-stage Consistency Learning Compressor [4.35807211471107]
  This work proposes a novel two-stage consistency learning approach for retrieved information compression in retrieval-augmented language models. The proposed method is empirically validated across multiple datasets, demonstrating notable enhancements in precision and efficiency for question-answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T12:43:23Z)
• Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context [55.564789967211844]
  An important desideratum of RALMs, is that retrieved information helps model performance when it is relevant. Recent work has shown that retrieval augmentation can sometimes have a negative effect on performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T18:52:35Z)
• Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts [88.78803442320246]
  We analyze the performance of language models on two tasks that require identifying relevant information in their input contexts. We find that performance can degrade significantly when changing the position of relevant information. Our analysis provides a better understanding of how language models use their input context and provides new evaluation protocols for future long-context language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T17:54:11Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy [164.83371924650294]
  We show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call Iter-RetGen, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner. A model output shows what might be needed to finish a task, and thus provides an informative context for retrieving more relevant knowledge. Iter-RetGen processes all retrieved knowledge as a whole and largely preserves the flexibility in generation without structural constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:17:36Z)
• Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context [29.315230178997002]
  We investigate how the model problem-solving accuracy can be influenced by irrelevant context. We use benchmark to measure the distractibility of cutting-edge prompting techniques for large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:48:57Z)
• How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions [134.29166998377187]
  We integrate information from a retrieval system with a pre-trained language model in a purely unsupervised way. We report that augmenting pre-trained language models in this way dramatically improves performance and that the resulting system, despite being unsupervised, is competitive with a supervised machine reading baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T09:28:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.