Weak Reward Model Transforms Generative Models into Robust Causal Event Extraction Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18245v2
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:19:55 GMT
- Title: Weak Reward Model Transforms Generative Models into Robust Causal Event Extraction Systems
- Authors: Italo Luis da Silva, Hanqi Yan, Lin Gui, Yulan He,
- Abstract summary: We train evaluation models to approximate human evaluation, achieving high agreement.
We propose a weak-to-strong supervision method that uses a fraction of the annotated data to train an evaluation model.
- Score: 17.10762463903638
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The inherent ambiguity of cause and effect boundaries poses a challenge in evaluating causal event extraction tasks. Traditional metrics like Exact Match and BertScore poorly reflect model performance, so we trained evaluation models to approximate human evaluation, achieving high agreement. We used them to perform Reinforcement Learning with extraction models to align them with human preference, prioritising semantic understanding. We successfully explored our approach through multiple datasets, including transferring an evaluator trained on one dataset to another as a way to decrease the reliance on human-annotated data. In that vein, we also propose a weak-to-strong supervision method that uses a fraction of the annotated data to train an evaluation model while still achieving high performance in training an RL model. Our code is available at https://github.com/oyarsa/event_extraction/tree/causal-event-extraction.
Related papers
- Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages.
Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z) - An Information Theoretic Approach to Machine Unlearning [45.600917449314444]
Key challenge in unlearning is forgetting the necessary data in a timely manner, while preserving model performance.
In this work, we address the zero-shot unlearning scenario, whereby an unlearning algorithm must be able to remove data given only a trained model and the data to be forgotten.
We derive a simple but principled zero-shot unlearning method based on the geometry of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T13:33:30Z) - Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and
Overoptimization in RLHF [79.98542868281471]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a technique that aligns language models closely with human-centric values.
It is observed that the performance of the reward model degrades after one epoch of training, and optimizing too much against the learned reward model eventually hinders the true objective.
This paper delves into these issues, leveraging the theoretical insights to design improved reward learning algorithm termed 'Iterative Data Smoothing' (IDS)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:43:42Z) - Noisy Self-Training with Synthetic Queries for Dense Retrieval [49.49928764695172]
We introduce a novel noisy self-training framework combined with synthetic queries.
Experimental results show that our method improves consistently over existing methods.
Our method is data efficient and outperforms competitive baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T06:19:50Z) - Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of
General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other.
We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z) - WSLRec: Weakly Supervised Learning for Neural Sequential Recommendation
Models [24.455665093145818]
We propose a novel model-agnostic training approach called WSLRec, which adopts a three-stage framework: pre-training, top-$k$ mining, intrinsic and fine-tuning.
WSLRec resolves the incompleteness problem by pre-training models on extra weak supervisions from model-free methods like BR and ItemCF, while resolving the inaccuracy problem by leveraging the top-$k$ mining to screen out reliable user-item relevance from weak supervisions for fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-28T08:55:12Z) - Exposing Shallow Heuristics of Relation Extraction Models with Challenge
Data [49.378860065474875]
We identify failure modes of SOTA relation extraction (RE) models trained on TACRED.
By adding some of the challenge data as training examples, the performance of the model improves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T21:17:25Z) - Learning to summarize from human feedback [18.964548137315333]
We show that it is possible to significantly improve summary quality by training a model to optimize for human preferences.
We apply our method to a version of the TL;DR dataset of Reddit posts and find that our models significantly outperform both human reference summaries and much larger models fine-tuned with supervised learning alone.
Our models also transfer to CNN/DM news articles, producing summaries nearly as good as the human reference without any news-specific fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-02T19:54:41Z) - S^3-Rec: Self-Supervised Learning for Sequential Recommendation with
Mutual Information Maximization [104.87483578308526]
We propose the model S3-Rec, which stands for Self-Supervised learning for Sequential Recommendation.
For our task, we devise four auxiliary self-supervised objectives to learn the correlations among attribute, item, subsequence, and sequence.
Extensive experiments conducted on six real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method over existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-18T11:44:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.