Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00993v1
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 06:10:01 GMT
- Title: Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents
- Authors: Shihan Deng, Weikai Xu, Hongda Sun, Wei Liu, Tao Tan, Jianfeng Liu, Ang Li, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Rui Yan, Shuo Shang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have become a research hotspot in human-computer interaction.
Mobile-Bench is a novel benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of LLM-based mobile agents.
- Score: 46.81304373693033
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: With the remarkable advancements of large language models (LLMs), LLM-based agents have become a research hotspot in human-computer interaction. However, there is a scarcity of benchmarks available for LLM-based mobile agents. Benchmarking these agents generally faces three main challenges: (1) The inefficiency of UI-only operations imposes limitations to task evaluation. (2) Specific instructions within a singular application lack adequacy for assessing the multi-dimensional reasoning and decision-making capacities of LLM mobile agents. (3) Current evaluation metrics are insufficient to accurately assess the process of sequential actions. To this end, we propose Mobile-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of LLM-based mobile agents. First, we expand conventional UI operations by incorporating 103 collected APIs to accelerate the efficiency of task completion. Subsequently, we collect evaluation data by combining real user queries with augmentation from LLMs. To better evaluate different levels of planning capabilities for mobile agents, our data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT, reflecting varying levels of task complexity. Mobile-Bench comprises 832 data entries, with more than 200 tasks specifically designed to evaluate multi-APP collaboration scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce a more accurate evaluation metric, named CheckPoint, to assess whether LLM-based mobile agents reach essential points during their planning and reasoning steps.
Related papers
- MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agents [7.4568642040547894]
Large language model (LLM)-based mobile agents are increasingly popular due to their capability to interact directly with mobile phone Graphic User Interfaces (GUIs)
Despite their promising prospects in both academic and industrial sectors, little research has focused on benchmarking the performance of existing mobile agents.
We propose an efficient and user-friendly benchmark, MobileAgentBench, designed to alleviate the burden of extensive manual testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T13:14:50Z) - DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents [9.60250892491588]
We propose a dataset curation agent benchmark, DCA-Bench, to measure large language models' capability of detecting hidden dataset quality issues.
Specifically, we collect diverse real-world dataset quality issues from eight open dataset platforms as a testbed.
The proposed benchmark can also serve as a testbed for measuring the capability of LLMs in problem discovery rather than just problem-solving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T14:02:23Z) - RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [54.07909112633993]
We introduce RepEval, the first metric leveraging the projection of LLM representations for evaluation.
RepEval requires minimal sample pairs for training, and through simple prompt modifications, it can easily transition to various tasks.
Results on ten datasets from three tasks demonstrate the high effectiveness of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z) - Using Large Language Models to Understand Telecom Standards [35.343893798039765]
Large Language Models (LLMs) may provide faster access to relevant information.
We evaluate the capability of state-of-art LLMs to be used as Question Answering (QA) assistants.
Results show that LLMs can be used as a credible reference tool on telecom technical documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T09:54:51Z) - Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs.
We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer.
This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z) - TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [85.3879908356586]
We introduce TaskBench to evaluate the capability of large language models in task automation.
To generate high-quality evaluation datasets, we introduce the concept of Tool Graph.
We also propose TaskEval to evaluate the capability of LLMs from different aspects, including task decomposition, tool invocation, and parameter prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z) - InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal
Large Language Models [50.03163753638256]
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence.
Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning.
We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T07:06:31Z) - AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks.
We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z) - Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating
Prediction [15.793007223588672]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generalizing to new tasks in a zero-shot or few-shot manner.
We investigate various LLMs in different sizes, ranging from 250M to 540B parameters and evaluate their performance in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T21:43:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.