Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02623v3
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:22:29 GMT
• Title: Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions
• Authors: Peijie Yu, Yifan Yang, Jinjian Li, Zelong Zhang, Haorui Wang, Xiao Feng, Feng Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong potential as agents for tool invocation due to their advanced comprehension and planning capabilities.<n>We propose the Multi-Mission Tool Bench. In the benchmark, each test case comprises multiple interrelated missions.<n>We also propose a novel method to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of agent decisions with dynamic decision trees.
• Score: 12.218102495632937
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong potential as agents for tool invocation due to their advanced comprehension and planning capabilities. Users increasingly rely on LLM-based agents to solve complex missions through iterative interactions. However, existing benchmarks predominantly access agents in single-mission scenarios, failing to capture real-world complexity. To bridge this gap, we propose the Multi-Mission Tool Bench. In the benchmark, each test case comprises multiple interrelated missions. This design requires agents to dynamically adapt to evolving demands. Moreover, the proposed benchmark explores all possible mission-switching patterns within a fixed mission number. Specifically, we propose a multi-agent data generation framework to construct the benchmark. We also propose a novel method to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of agent decisions with dynamic decision trees. Experiments on diverse open-source and closed-source LLMs reveal critical factors influencing agent robustness and provide actionable insights to the tool invocation society.

Related papers

• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.787341008881036]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors. ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions. Experimental results demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs) We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
  This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks. We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z)
• Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
  Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities. When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z)
• Agent-Pro: Learning to Evolve via Policy-Level Reflection and Optimization [53.510942601223626]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit robust problem-solving capabilities for diverse tasks. These task solvers necessitate manually crafted prompts to inform task rules and regulate behaviors. We propose Agent-Pro: an LLM-based Agent with Policy-level Reflection and Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T15:09:20Z)
• LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environments [35.926581910260076]
  We introduce LLMArena, a framework for evaluating the capabilities of large language models in multi-agent dynamic environments. LLArena employs Trueskill scoring to assess crucial abilities in LLM agents, including spatial reasoning, strategic planning, numerical reasoning, risk assessment, communication, opponent modeling, and team collaboration. We conduct an extensive experiment and human evaluation among different sizes and types of LLMs, showing that LLMs still have a significant journey ahead in their development towards becoming fully autonomous agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T11:31:48Z)
• MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [98.18244218156492]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing.<n>As their applications expand into multi-agent environments, there arises a need for a comprehensive evaluation framework.<n>This work introduces a novel competition-based benchmark framework to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z)
• Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
  LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving. We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time. Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks. We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.