Free-text Rationale Generation under Readability Level Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01384v2
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:52:12 GMT
• Title: Free-text Rationale Generation under Readability Level Control
• Authors: Yi-Sheng Hsu, Nils Feldhus, Sherzod Hakimov,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how large language models (LLMs) perform rationale generation under the effects of readability level control. We find that explanations are adaptable to such instruction, though the requested readability is often misaligned with the measured text complexity. Our human annotators confirm a generally satisfactory impression on rationales at all readability levels.
• Score: 6.338124510580766
• License:
• Abstract: Free-text rationales justify model decisions in natural language and thus become likable and accessible among approaches to explanation across many tasks. However, their effectiveness can be hindered by misinterpretation and hallucination. As a perturbation test, we investigate how large language models (LLMs) perform rationale generation under the effects of readability level control, i.e., being prompted for an explanation targeting a specific expertise level, such as sixth grade or college. We find that explanations are adaptable to such instruction, though the requested readability is often misaligned with the measured text complexity according to traditional readability metrics. Furthermore, the generated rationales tend to feature medium level complexity, which correlates with the measured quality using automatic metrics. Finally, our human annotators confirm a generally satisfactory impression on rationales at all readability levels, with high-school-level readability being most commonly perceived and favored.

Related papers

• Analysing Zero-Shot Readability-Controlled Sentence Simplification [54.09069745799918]
  We investigate how different types of contextual information affect a model's ability to generate sentences with the desired readability. Results show that all tested models struggle to simplify sentences due to models' limitations and characteristics of the source sentences. Our experiments also highlight the need for better automatic evaluation metrics tailored to RCTS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T12:36:25Z)
• Generating Summaries with Controllable Readability Levels [67.34087272813821]
  Several factors affect the readability level, such as the complexity of the text, its subject matter, and the reader's background knowledge. Current text generation approaches lack refined control, resulting in texts that are not customized to readers' proficiency levels. We develop three text generation techniques for controlling readability: instruction-based readability control, reinforcement learning to minimize the gap between requested and observed readability, and a decoding approach that uses look-ahead to estimate the readability of upcoming decoding steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T17:46:26Z)
• More Than Words: Towards Better Quality Interpretations of Text Classifiers [16.66535643383862]
  We show that token-based interpretability, while being a convenient first choice given the input interfaces of the ML models, is not the most effective one in all situations. We show that higher-level feature attributions offer several advantages: 1) they are more robust as measured by the randomization tests, 2) they lead to lower variability when using approximation-based methods like SHAP, and 3) they are more intelligible to humans in situations where the linguistic coherence resides at a higher level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T10:18:50Z)
• Plot-guided Adversarial Example Construction for Evaluating Open-domain Story Generation [23.646133241521614]
  Learnable evaluation metrics have promised more accurate assessments by having higher correlations with human judgments. Previous works relied on textitheuristically manipulated plausible examples to mimic possible system drawbacks. We propose to tackle these issues by generating a more comprehensive set of implausible stories using em plots, which are structured representations of controllable factors used to generate stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T20:19:24Z)
• Lexically-constrained Text Generation through Commonsense Knowledge Extraction and Injection [62.071938098215085]
  We focus on the Commongen benchmark, wherein the aim is to generate a plausible sentence for a given set of input concepts. We propose strategies for enhancing the semantic correctness of the generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T23:23:40Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)
• Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationales [60.58672852655487]
  In interpretable NLP, we require faithful rationales that reflect the model's decision-making process for an explained instance. We demonstrate that pipelines, existing models for faithful extractive rationalization on information-extraction style tasks, do not extend as reliably to "reasoning" tasks requiring free-text rationales. We turn to models that jointly predict and rationalize, a class of widely used high-performance models for free-text rationalization whose faithfulness is not yet established.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T03:40:56Z)
• A Controllable Model of Grounded Response Generation [122.7121624884747]
  Current end-to-end neural conversation models inherently lack the flexibility to impose semantic control in the response generation process. We propose a framework that we call controllable grounded response generation (CGRG) We show that using this framework, a transformer based model with a novel inductive attention mechanism, trained on a conversation-like Reddit dataset, outperforms strong generation baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:22:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.