Beyond One-Size-Fits-All Summarization: Customizing Summaries for Diverse Users
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10675v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:08:36 GMT
- Title: Beyond One-Size-Fits-All Summarization: Customizing Summaries for Diverse Users
- Authors: Mehmet Samet Duran, Tevfik Aytekin,
- Abstract summary: Controlling readability of textual data is an important element for creating summaries for different audiences.<n>We create our own custom dataset and train a model with our custom architecture.<n>Our method ensures that readability levels are effectively controlled while maintaining accuracy and coherence.
- Score: 1.3812010983144802
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In recent years, automatic text summarization has witnessed significant advancement, particularly with the development of transformer-based models. However, the challenge of controlling the readability level of generated summaries remains an under-explored area, especially for languages with complex linguistic features like Turkish. This gap has the effect of impeding effective communication and also limits the accessibility of information. Controlling readability of textual data is an important element for creating summaries for different audiences with varying literacy and education levels, such as students ranging from primary school to graduate level, as well as individuals with diverse educational backgrounds. Summaries that align with the needs of specific reader groups can improve comprehension and engagement, ensuring that the intended message is effectively communicated. Furthermore, readability adjustment is essential to expand the usability of summarization models in educational and professional domains. Current summarization models often don't have the mechanisms to adjust the complexity of their outputs, resulting in summaries that may be too simplistic or overly complex for certain types of reader groups. Developing adaptive models that can tailor content to specific readability levels is therefore crucial. To address this problem, we create our own custom dataset and train a model with our custom architecture. Our method ensures that readability levels are effectively controlled while maintaining accuracy and coherence. We rigorously compare our model to a supervised fine-tuned baseline, demonstrating its superiority in generating readability-aware summaries.
Related papers
- KnowsLM: A framework for evaluation of small language models for knowledge augmentation and humanised conversations [0.0]
This study investigates the influence of LoRA rank, dataset scale, and prompt prefix design on knowledge retention and stylistic alignment.
Evaluations by LLM-based judges across knowledge accuracy, conversational quality, and conciseness suggest that fine-tuning is best suited for tone adaptation, whereas RAG excels at real-time knowledge augmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-06T17:58:08Z) - Analysing Zero-Shot Readability-Controlled Sentence Simplification [54.09069745799918]
We investigate how different types of contextual information affect a model's ability to generate sentences with the desired readability.<n>Results show that all tested models struggle to simplify sentences due to models' limitations and characteristics of the source sentences.<n>Our experiments also highlight the need for better automatic evaluation metrics tailored to RCTS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T12:36:25Z) - Harnessing the Intrinsic Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models for Challenging Text Classification Settings [5.257719744958367]
This thesis explores three challenging settings in text classification by leveraging the intrinsic knowledge of pretrained language models (PLMs)
We develop models that utilize features based on contextualized word representations from PLMs, achieving performance that rivals or surpasses human accuracy.
Lastly, we tackle the sensitivity of large language models to in-context learning prompts by selecting effective demonstrations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T09:07:30Z) - Personalized Video Summarization using Text-Based Queries and Conditional Modeling [3.4447129363520337]
This thesis explores enhancing video summarization by integrating text-based queries and conditional modeling.
Evaluation metrics such as accuracy and F1-score assess the quality of the generated summaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-27T02:43:40Z) - Factual Dialogue Summarization via Learning from Large Language Models [35.63037083806503]
Large language model (LLM)-based automatic text summarization models generate more factually consistent summaries.
We employ zero-shot learning to extract symbolic knowledge from LLMs, generating factually consistent (positive) and inconsistent (negative) summaries.
Our approach achieves better factual consistency while maintaining coherence, fluency, and relevance, as confirmed by various automatic evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T20:03:37Z) - CELA: Cost-Efficient Language Model Alignment for CTR Prediction [70.65910069412944]
Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction holds a paramount position in recommender systems.
Recent efforts have sought to mitigate these challenges by integrating Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs)
We propose textbfCost-textbfEfficient textbfLanguage Model textbfAlignment (textbfCELA) for CTR prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T07:43:25Z) - We're Calling an Intervention: Exploring Fundamental Hurdles in Adapting Language Models to Nonstandard Text [8.956635443376527]
We present a suite of experiments that allow us to understand the underlying challenges of language model adaptation to nonstandard text.
We do so by designing interventions that approximate core features of user-generated text and their interactions with existing biases of language models.
Applying our interventions during language model adaptation to nonstandard text variations, we gain important insights into when such adaptation is successful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T18:56:53Z) - Text2Data: Low-Resource Data Generation with Textual Control [100.5970757736845]
Text2Data is a novel approach that utilizes unlabeled data to understand the underlying data distribution.<n>It undergoes finetuning via a novel constraint optimization-based learning objective that ensures controllability and effectively counteracts catastrophic forgetting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T03:41:39Z) - Generating Summaries with Controllable Readability Levels [67.34087272813821]
Several factors affect the readability level, such as the complexity of the text, its subject matter, and the reader's background knowledge.
Current text generation approaches lack refined control, resulting in texts that are not customized to readers' proficiency levels.
We develop three text generation techniques for controlling readability: instruction-based readability control, reinforcement learning to minimize the gap between requested and observed readability, and a decoding approach that uses look-ahead to estimate the readability of upcoming decoding steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T17:46:26Z) - Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory [64.71038763708161]
Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP)
What further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining.
How the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T18:58:29Z) - SDA: Improving Text Generation with Self Data Augmentation [88.24594090105899]
We propose to improve the standard maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) paradigm by incorporating a self-imitation-learning phase for automatic data augmentation.
Unlike most existing sentence-level augmentation strategies, our method is more general and could be easily adapted to any MLE-based training procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-02T01:15:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.