Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02477v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:55:03 GMT
• Title: Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study
• Authors: Elmira Amirloo, Jean-Philippe Fauconnier, Christoph Roesmann, Christian Kerl, Rinu Boney, Yusu Qian, Zirui Wang, Afshin Dehghan, Yinfei Yang, Zhe Gan, Peter Grasch,
• Abstract summary: We analyze each aspect of preference alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We show that combining offline and online methods can improve the performance of the model in certain scenarios. We introduce a novel way of creating multimodal preference data called Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS)
• Score: 46.33812471516309
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Preference alignment has become a crucial component in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its impact in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains comparatively underexplored. Similar to language models, MLLMs for image understanding tasks encounter challenges like hallucination. In MLLMs, hallucination can occur not only by stating incorrect facts but also by producing responses that are inconsistent with the image content. A primary objective of alignment for MLLMs is to encourage these models to align responses more closely with image information. Recently, multiple works have introduced preference datasets for MLLMs and examined different alignment methods, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, due to variations in datasets, base model types, and alignment methods, it remains unclear which specific elements contribute most significantly to the reported improvements in these works. In this paper, we independently analyze each aspect of preference alignment in MLLMs. We start by categorizing the alignment algorithms into two groups, offline (such as DPO), and online (such as online-DPO), and show that combining offline and online methods can improve the performance of the model in certain scenarios. We review a variety of published multimodal preference datasets and discuss how the details of their construction impact model performance. Based on these insights, we introduce a novel way of creating multimodal preference data called Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS) that needs neither additional annotation nor external models, and show that it can achieve competitive performance to previously published alignment work for multimodal models across a range of benchmarks.

Related papers

• Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization [65.64108848398696]
  We introduce a preference optimization process to enhance the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We develop a simple yet effective method, termed Mixed Preference Optimization (MPO), which boosts multimodal CoT performance. Our model, InternVL2-8B-MPO, achieves an accuracy of 67.0 on MathVista, outperforming InternVL2-8B by 8.7 points and achieving performance comparable to the 10x larger InternVL2-76B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T18:59:27Z)
• MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time [50.41806216615488]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge and remarkable abilities from extensive text corpora. To make LLMs more usable, aligning them with human preferences is essential. We propose an effective method, textbf MetaAlign, which aims to help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:31:13Z)
• Align$^2$LLaVA: Cascaded Human and Large Language Model Preference Alignment for Multi-modal Instruction Curation [56.75665429851673]
  This paper introduces a novel instruction curation algorithm, derived from two unique perspectives, human and LLM preference alignment. Experiments demonstrate that we can maintain or even improve model performance by compressing synthetic multimodal instructions by up to 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T08:20:59Z)
• Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Entity Matching [3.7277730514654555]
  Generative large language models (LLMs) are a promising alternative to pre-trained language models for entity matching. This paper explores the potential of fine-tuning LLMs for entity matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T16:20:57Z)
• The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunities [0.35998666903987897]
  This report examines the fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) It outlines the historical evolution of LLMs from traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) models to their pivotal role in AI. The report introduces a structured seven-stage pipeline for fine-tuning LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T14:48:02Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• Model Composition for Multimodal Large Language Models [71.5729418523411]
  We propose a new paradigm through the model composition of existing MLLMs to create a new model that retains the modal understanding capabilities of each original model. Our basic implementation, NaiveMC, demonstrates the effectiveness of this paradigm by reusing modality encoders and merging LLM parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T06:38:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.