SOWA: Adapting Hierarchical Frozen Window Self-Attention to Visual-Language Models for Better Anomaly Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03634v4
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 02:01:50 GMT
- Title: SOWA: Adapting Hierarchical Frozen Window Self-Attention to Visual-Language Models for Better Anomaly Detection
- Authors: Zongxiang Hu, Zhaosheng Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel window self-attention mechanism based on the CLIP model, augmented with learnable prompts to process multi-level features.
Our method has been rigorously evaluated on five benchmark datasets, achieving superior performance by leading in 18 out of 20 metrics.
- Score: 0.6906005491572401
- License:
- Abstract: Visual anomaly detection is essential in industrial manufacturing, yet traditional methods often rely heavily on extensive normal datasets and task-specific models, limiting their scalability. Recent advancements in large-scale vision-language models have significantly enhanced zero- and few-shot anomaly detection. However, these approaches may not fully leverage hierarchical features, potentially overlooking nuanced details crucial for accurate detection. To address this, we introduce a novel window self-attention mechanism based on the CLIP model, augmented with learnable prompts to process multi-level features within a Soldier-Officer Window Self-Attention (SOWA) framework. Our method has been rigorously evaluated on five benchmark datasets, achieving superior performance by leading in 18 out of 20 metrics, setting a new standard against existing state-of-the-art techniques.
Related papers
- LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.
LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.
We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z) - Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance.
Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z) - Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Recognition in the Low-Data Regime Through Feature Magnitude Regularization [23.78498670529746]
We introduce a regularization technique to ensure that the magnitudes of the extracted features are evenly distributed.
Despite its apparent simplicity, our approach has demonstrated significant performance improvements across various fine-grained visual recognition datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T07:32:46Z) - GM-DF: Generalized Multi-Scenario Deepfake Detection [49.072106087564144]
Existing face forgery detection usually follows the paradigm of training models in a single domain.
In this paper, we elaborately investigate the generalization capacity of deepfake detection models when jointly trained on multiple face forgery detection datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T17:42:08Z) - AIDE: An Automatic Data Engine for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving [68.73885845181242]
We propose an Automatic Data Engine (AIDE) that automatically identifies issues, efficiently curates data, improves the model through auto-labeling, and verifies the model through generation of diverse scenarios.
We further establish a benchmark for open-world detection on AV datasets to comprehensively evaluate various learning paradigms, demonstrating our method's superior performance at a reduced cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T04:27:56Z) - Data-efficient Large Vision Models through Sequential Autoregression [58.26179273091461]
We develop an efficient, autoregression-based vision model on a limited dataset.
We demonstrate how this model achieves proficiency in a spectrum of visual tasks spanning both high-level and low-level semantic understanding.
Our empirical evaluations underscore the model's agility in adapting to various tasks, heralding a significant reduction in the parameter footprint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T13:41:53Z) - Open-Vocabulary Video Anomaly Detection [57.552523669351636]
Video anomaly detection (VAD) with weak supervision has achieved remarkable performance in utilizing video-level labels to discriminate whether a video frame is normal or abnormal.
Recent studies attempt to tackle a more realistic setting, open-set VAD, which aims to detect unseen anomalies given seen anomalies and normal videos.
This paper takes a step further and explores open-vocabulary video anomaly detection (OVVAD), in which we aim to leverage pre-trained large models to detect and categorize seen and unseen anomalies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T02:54:17Z) - Who Explains the Explanation? Quantitatively Assessing Feature
Attribution Methods [0.0]
We propose a novel evaluation metric -- the Focus -- designed to quantify the faithfulness of explanations.
We show the robustness of the metric through randomization experiments, and then use Focus to evaluate and compare three popular explainability techniques.
Our results find LRP and GradCAM to be consistent and reliable, while the latter remains most competitive even when applied to poorly performing models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T07:10:24Z) - Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and
Downstream Implications [8.15254368157658]
We analyze CLIP and highlight some of the challenges such models pose.
We find that CLIP can inherit biases found in prior computer vision systems.
These results add evidence to the growing body of work calling for a change in the notion of a 'better' model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-05T19:05:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.