Missed Causes and Ambiguous Effects: Counterfactuals Pose Challenges for Interpreting Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04690v1
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:53:03 GMT
- Title: Missed Causes and Ambiguous Effects: Counterfactuals Pose Challenges for Interpreting Neural Networks
- Authors: Aaron Mueller,
- Abstract summary: Interpretability research takes counterfactual theories of causality for granted.
Counterfactual theories have problems that bias our findings in specific and predictable ways.
We discuss the implications of these challenges for interpretability researchers.
- Score: 14.407025310553225
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Interpretability research takes counterfactual theories of causality for granted. Most causal methods rely on counterfactual interventions to inputs or the activations of particular model components, followed by observations of the change in models' output logits or behaviors. While this yields more faithful evidence than correlational methods, counterfactuals nonetheless have key problems that bias our findings in specific and predictable ways. Specifically, (i) counterfactual theories do not effectively capture multiple independently sufficient causes of the same effect, which leads us to miss certain causes entirely; and (ii) counterfactual dependencies in neural networks are generally not transitive, which complicates methods for extracting and interpreting causal graphs from neural networks. We discuss the implications of these challenges for interpretability researchers and propose concrete suggestions for future work.
Related papers
- Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data.
We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations.
We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z) - Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data.
One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z) - Nonlinearity, Feedback and Uniform Consistency in Causal Structural
Learning [0.8158530638728501]
Causal Discovery aims to find automated search methods for learning causal structures from observational data.
This thesis focuses on two questions in causal discovery: (i) providing an alternative definition of k-Triangle Faithfulness that (i) is weaker than strong faithfulness when applied to the Gaussian family of distributions, and (ii) under the assumption that the modified version of Strong Faithfulness holds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T01:23:42Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Causal Analysis for Robust Interpretability of Neural Networks [0.2519906683279152]
We develop a robust interventional-based method to capture cause-effect mechanisms in pre-trained neural networks.
We apply our method to vision models trained on classification tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-15T18:37:24Z) - Identifying Weight-Variant Latent Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
We find that transitivity acts as a key role in impeding the identifiability of latent causal representations.
Under some mild assumptions, we can show that the latent causal representations can be identified up to trivial permutation and scaling.
We propose a novel method, termed Structural caUsAl Variational autoEncoder, which directly learns latent causal representations and causal relationships among them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-30T11:12:59Z) - ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction.
Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario.
We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z) - Verifying the Causes of Adversarial Examples [5.381050729919025]
The robustness of neural networks is challenged by adversarial examples that contain almost imperceptible perturbations to inputs.
We present a collection of potential causes of adversarial examples and verify (or partially verify) them through carefully-designed controlled experiments.
Our experiment results show that geometric factors tend to be more direct causes and statistical factors magnify the phenomenon.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T16:17:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.