Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06089v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 16:29:08 GMT
- Title: Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Models
- Authors: Jinliang Lu, Ziliang Pang, Min Xiao, Yaochen Zhu, Rui Xia, Jiajun Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Despite their diverse capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit varying strengths and weaknesses.
To address these challenges, recent studies have explored collaborative strategies for LLMs.
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of this emerging research area, highlighting the motivation behind such collaborations.
- Score: 32.336273322481276
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The remarkable success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered natural language processing (NLP) research into a new era. Despite their diverse capabilities, LLMs trained on different corpora exhibit varying strengths and weaknesses, leading to challenges in maximizing their overall efficiency and versatility. To address these challenges, recent studies have explored collaborative strategies for LLMs. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of this emerging research area, highlighting the motivation behind such collaborations. Specifically, we categorize collaborative strategies into three primary approaches: Merging, Ensemble, and Cooperation. Merging involves integrating multiple LLMs in the parameter space. Ensemble combines the outputs of various LLMs. Cooperation} leverages different LLMs to allow full play to their diverse capabilities for specific tasks. We provide in-depth introductions to these methods from different perspectives and discuss their potential applications. Additionally, we outline future research directions, hoping this work will catalyze further studies on LLM collaborations and paving the way for advanced NLP applications.
Related papers
- Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey [88.66719962576005]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkably powerful capabilities.
One of the crucial factors to achieve success is aligning the LLM's output with human preferences.
We decompose all the strategies in preference learning into four components: model, data, feedback, and algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T15:11:55Z) - Can LLMs Solve longer Math Word Problems Better? [47.227621867242]
Math Word Problems (MWPs) are crucial for evaluating the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs)
This study pioneers the exploration of Context Length Generalizability (CoLeG)
Two novel metrics are proposed to assess the efficacy and resilience of LLMs in solving these problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T17:13:50Z) - Evolutionary Computation in the Era of Large Language Model: Survey and Roadmap [26.959633651475016]
The interplay between large language models (LLMs) and evolutionary algorithms (EAs) share a common pursuit of applicability in complex problems.
The abundant domain knowledge inherent in LLMs could enable EA to conduct more intelligent searches.
This paper provides a thorough review and a forward-looking roadmap, categorizing the reciprocal inspiration into two main avenues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T14:58:17Z) - Towards Vision Enhancing LLMs: Empowering Multimodal Knowledge Storage
and Sharing in LLMs [72.49064988035126]
We propose an approach called MKS2, aimed at enhancing multimodal large language models (MLLMs)
Specifically, we introduce the Modular Visual Memory, a component integrated into the internal blocks of LLMs, designed to store open-world visual information efficiently.
Our experiments demonstrate that MKS2 substantially augments the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in contexts necessitating physical or commonsense knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T12:29:20Z) - Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View [60.80731090755224]
This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by practical experiments with theoretical insights.
We fabricate four unique societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct thinking pattern' (debate or reflection)
Our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring social psychology theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T15:05:52Z) - Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration [83.4031923134958]
Corex is a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform Large Language Models into autonomous agents.
Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes.
We demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T07:11:39Z) - A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models [68.22178313875618]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks.
This article provides an overview of the existing literature on a broad range of LLM-related concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-12T20:01:52Z) - Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An
In-depth Analysis via Debate [41.949869545423375]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in various applications, but they still face various inconsistency issues.
To examine whether LLMs can collaborate effectively to achieve a consensus for a shared goal, we focus on commonsense reasoning.
Our work contributes to understanding the inter-consistency among LLMs and lays the foundation for developing future collaboration methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T11:15:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.