Consistent Document-Level Relation Extraction via Counterfactuals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06699v2
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:37:35 GMT
• Title: Consistent Document-Level Relation Extraction via Counterfactuals
• Authors: Ali Modarressi, Abdullatif Köksal, Hinrich Schütze,
• Abstract summary: It has been shown that document-level relation extraction models trained on real-world data suffer from factual biases. We present CovEReD, a dataset of document-level counterfactual data for document extraction. We show that by generating document-level counterfactual data with CovEReD models on them, consistency is maintained.
• Score: 47.75615221596254
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many datasets have been developed to train and evaluate document-level relation extraction (RE) models. Most of these are constructed using real-world data. It has been shown that RE models trained on real-world data suffer from factual biases. To evaluate and address this issue, we present CovEReD, a counterfactual data generation approach for document-level relation extraction datasets using entity replacement. We first demonstrate that models trained on factual data exhibit inconsistent behavior: while they accurately extract triples from factual data, they fail to extract the same triples after counterfactual modification. This inconsistency suggests that models trained on factual data rely on spurious signals such as specific entities and external knowledge $\unicode{x2013}$ rather than on the input context $\unicode{x2013}$ to extract triples. We show that by generating document-level counterfactual data with CovEReD and training models on them, consistency is maintained with minimal impact on RE performance. We release our CovEReD pipeline as well as Re-DocRED-CF, a dataset of counterfactual RE documents, to assist in evaluating and addressing inconsistency in document-level RE.

Related papers

• Contrastive Learning to Improve Retrieval for Real-world Fact Checking [84.57583869042791]
  We present Contrastive Fact-Checking Reranker (CFR), an improved retriever for fact-checking complex claims. We leverage the AVeriTeC dataset, which annotates subquestions for claims with human written answers from evidence documents. We find a 6% improvement in veracity classification accuracy on the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T00:09:50Z)
• Fact Checking Beyond Training Set [64.88575826304024]
  We show that the retriever-reader suffers from performance deterioration when it is trained on labeled data from one domain and used in another domain. We propose an adversarial algorithm to make the retriever component robust against distribution shift. We then construct eight fact checking scenarios from these datasets, and compare our model to a set of strong baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T15:15:14Z)
• AutoRE: Document-Level Relation Extraction with Large Language Models [27.426703757501507]
  We introduce AutoRE, an end-to-end DocRE model that adopts a novel RE extraction paradigm named RHF (Relation-Head-Facts) Unlike existing approaches, AutoRE does not rely on the assumption of known relation options, making it more reflective of real-world scenarios. Our experiments on the RE-DocRED dataset showcase AutoRE's best performance, achieving state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T23:48:21Z)
• PRiSM: Enhancing Low-Resource Document-Level Relation Extraction with Relation-Aware Score Calibration [44.074482478955126]
  Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to extract relations of all entity pairs in a document. Key challenge in DocRE is the cost of annotating such data which requires intensive human effort. We propose PRiSM, which learns to adapt logits based on relation semantic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T04:42:39Z)
• Revisiting DocRED -- Addressing the False Negative Problem in Relation Extraction [39.78594332093083]
  We re-annotate 4,053 documents in the DocRED dataset by adding the missed relation triples back to the original DocRED. We conduct extensive experiments with state-of-the-art neural models on both datasets, and the experimental results show that the models trained and evaluated on our Re-DocRED achieve performance improvements of around 13 F1 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T11:54:48Z)
• Falsesum: Generating Document-level NLI Examples for Recognizing Factual Inconsistency in Summarization [63.21819285337555]
  We show that NLI models can be effective for this task when the training data is augmented with high-quality task-oriented examples. We introduce Falsesum, a data generation pipeline leveraging a controllable text generation model to perturb human-annotated summaries. We show that models trained on a Falsesum-augmented NLI dataset improve the state-of-the-art performance across four benchmarks for detecting factual inconsistency in summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T10:43:42Z)
• Document-Level Relation Extraction with Sentences Importance Estimation and Focusing [52.069206266557266]
  Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine the relation between two entities from a document of multiple sentences. We propose a Sentence Estimation and Focusing (SIEF) framework for DocRE, where we design a sentence importance score and a sentence focusing loss. Experimental results on two domains show that our SIEF not only improves overall performance, but also makes DocRE models more robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T03:20:07Z)
• Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED [60.39125850987604]
  We show that a textit-revise scheme results in false negative samples and an obvious bias towards popular entities and relations. The relabeled dataset is released to serve as a more reliable test set of document RE models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T11:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.