HAMIL-QA: Hierarchical Approach to Multiple Instance Learning for Atrial LGE MRI Quality Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07254v1
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:19:21 GMT
- Title: HAMIL-QA: Hierarchical Approach to Multiple Instance Learning for Atrial LGE MRI Quality Assessment
- Authors: K M Arefeen Sultan, Md Hasibul Husain Hisham, Benjamin Orkild, Alan Morris, Eugene Kholmovski, Erik Bieging, Eugene Kwan, Ravi Ranjan, Ed DiBella, Shireen Elhabian,
- Abstract summary: This study introduces HAMIL-QA, a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework, designed to overcome these obstacles.
Hamil-QA employs a hierarchical bag and sub-bag structure that allows for targeted analysis within sub-bags and aggregates insights at the volume level.
Our experiments show that HAMIL-QA surpasses existing MIL methods and traditional supervised approaches in accuracy, AUROC, and F1-Score on an LGE MRI scan dataset.
- Score: 0.21065896965719066
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The accurate evaluation of left atrial fibrosis via high-quality 3D Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) MRI is crucial for atrial fibrillation management but is hindered by factors like patient movement and imaging variability. The pursuit of automated LGE MRI quality assessment is critical for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, standardizing evaluations, and improving patient outcomes. The deep learning models aimed at automating this process face significant challenges due to the scarcity of expert annotations, high computational costs, and the need to capture subtle diagnostic details in highly variable images. This study introduces HAMIL-QA, a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework, designed to overcome these obstacles. HAMIL-QA employs a hierarchical bag and sub-bag structure that allows for targeted analysis within sub-bags and aggregates insights at the volume level. This hierarchical MIL approach reduces reliance on extensive annotations, lessens computational load, and ensures clinically relevant quality predictions by focusing on diagnostically critical image features. Our experiments show that HAMIL-QA surpasses existing MIL methods and traditional supervised approaches in accuracy, AUROC, and F1-Score on an LGE MRI scan dataset, demonstrating its potential as a scalable solution for LGE MRI quality assessment automation. The code is available at: $\href{https://github.com/arf111/HAMIL-QA}{\text{this https URL}}$
Related papers
- Rethinking Medical Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI: An Image Quality Assessment Perspective [14.39502951611029]
We propose a fusion quality loss function that combines Structural Similarity Index Measure loss with l1 loss, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of reconstruction quality.
We also introduce a data pre-processing strategy that enhances the average intensity ratio (AIR) between normal and abnormal regions, further improving the distinction of anomalies.
The proposed IQA approach achieves significant improvements (>10%) in terms of Dice coefficient (DICE) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) on the BraTS21 (T2, FLAIR) and MSULB datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T15:55:07Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.
We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.
Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - Decoding Cognitive Health Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation for Diagnosis of Significant Memory Concern [3.5574575466006895]
The timely identification of significant memory concern (SMC) is crucial for proactive cognitive health management.
This study presents a state-of-the-art review followed by a comprehensive evaluation of machine learning models.
In RNNs, deep random vector functional link (dRVFL) and ensemble dRVFL (edRVFL) emerge as the best classifiers in terms of performance metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-11T18:48:59Z) - Empowering Healthcare through Privacy-Preserving MRI Analysis [3.6394715554048234]
We introduce the Ensemble-Based Federated Learning (EBFL) Framework.
EBFL framework deviates from the conventional approach by emphasizing model features over sharing sensitive patient data.
We have achieved remarkable precision in the classification of brain tumors, including glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and non-tumor instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T19:51:18Z) - Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning Based Segmentation: A
Post-Hoc Approach for Left Ventricle Volume Estimation in MRI [0.0]
Left ventricular (LV) volume estimation is critical for valid diagnosis and management of various cardiovascular conditions.
Recent machine learning advancements, particularly U-Net-like convolutional networks, have facilitated automated segmentation for medical images.
This study proposes a novel methodology for post-hoc uncertainty estimation in LV volume prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T13:44:55Z) - Two-Stage Deep Learning Framework for Quality Assessment of Left Atrial
Late Gadolinium Enhanced MRI Images [0.22585387137796725]
We propose a two-stage deep-learning approach for automated LGE-MRI image diagnostic quality assessment.
The method includes a left atrium detector to focus on relevant regions and a deep network to evaluate diagnostic quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T01:27:36Z) - Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities.
One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data.
Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z) - Unsupervised deep learning techniques for powdery mildew recognition
based on multispectral imaging [63.62764375279861]
This paper presents a deep learning approach to automatically recognize powdery mildew on cucumber leaves.
We focus on unsupervised deep learning techniques applied to multispectral imaging data.
We propose the use of autoencoder architectures to investigate two strategies for disease detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T13:29:13Z) - Deep AUC Maximization for Medical Image Classification: Challenges and
Opportunities [60.079782224958414]
We will present and discuss opportunities and challenges brought by a new deep learning method by AUC (aka underlinebf Deep underlinebf AUC classification)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T15:31:32Z) - Lung Cancer Lesion Detection in Histopathology Images Using Graph-Based
Sparse PCA Network [93.22587316229954]
We propose a graph-based sparse principal component analysis (GS-PCA) network, for automated detection of cancerous lesions on histological lung slides stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
We evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm on H&E slides obtained from an SVM K-rasG12D lung cancer mouse model using precision/recall rates, F-score, Tanimoto coefficient, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T19:28:36Z) - Robust Deep AUC Maximization: A New Surrogate Loss and Empirical Studies
on Medical Image Classification [63.44396343014749]
We propose a new margin-based surrogate loss function for the AUC score.
It is more robust than the commonly used.
square loss while enjoying the same advantage in terms of large-scale optimization.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that makes DAM succeed on large-scale medical image datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-06T03:41:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.