African Democracy in the Era of Generative Disinformation: Challenges and Countermeasures against AI-Generated Propaganda
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07695v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:24:53 GMT
- Title: African Democracy in the Era of Generative Disinformation: Challenges and Countermeasures against AI-Generated Propaganda
- Authors: Chinasa T. Okolo,
- Abstract summary: This paper aims to highlight the risks associated with the spread of generative AI-driven disinformation within Africa.
To understand how African governments might effectively counteract the impact of AI-generated propaganda, this paper presents case studies illustrating the current usage of generative AI for election-related propaganda in Africa.
- Score: 1.0878040851638
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In light of prominent discourse around the negative implications of generative AI, an emerging area of research is investigating the current and estimated impacts of AI-generated propaganda on African citizens participating in elections. Throughout Africa, there have already been suspected cases of AI-generated propaganda influencing electoral outcomes or precipitating coups in countries like Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and Gabon, underscoring the need for comprehensive research in this domain. This paper aims to highlight the risks associated with the spread of generative AI-driven disinformation within Africa while concurrently examining the roles of government, civil society, academia, and the general public in the responsible development, practical use, and robust governance of AI. To understand how African governments might effectively counteract the impact of AI-generated propaganda, this paper presents case studies illustrating the current usage of generative AI for election-related propaganda in Africa. Subsequently, this paper discusses efforts by fact-checking organisations to mitigate the negative impacts of disinformation, explores the potential for new initiatives to actively engage citizens in literacy efforts to combat disinformation spread, and advocates for increased governmental regulatory measures. Overall, this research seeks to increase comprehension of the potential ramifications of AI-generated propaganda on democratic processes within Africa and propose actionable strategies for stakeholders to address these multifaceted challenges.
Related papers
- Biased AI can Influence Political Decision-Making [64.9461133083473]
This paper presents two experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in AI language models on political decision-making.
We found that participants exposed to politically biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions aligning with the AI's bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T22:56:00Z) - Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems.
We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts.
We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z) - Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference [11.323961700172175]
This paper explores the nefarious applications of GenAI, highlighting their potential to disrupt democratic processes.
Malicious actors exploit these technologies to try influencing voter behavior, spread disinformation, and undermine public trust in electoral systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T00:26:12Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Case Studies of AI Policy Development in Africa [1.3194391758295114]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) requires new ways of evaluating national technology use and strategy for African nations.
We conclude that existing global readiness assessments do not fully capture African states' progress in AI readiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T19:17:11Z) - Empowering Africa: An In-depth Exploration of the Adoption of Artificial
Intelligence Across the Continent [0.0]
The study considers regional nuances, cultural factors, and infrastructural constraints shaping the deployment of AI solutions in Africa.
Case studies in healthcare, agriculture, finance, and education highlight AI's transformative potential for efficiency, accessibility, and inclusivity.
Ethical considerations, including data privacy and algorithmic bias, are addressed alongside policy frameworks supporting responsible AI implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T12:07:13Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility [0.0]
To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented.
This study examines FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI.
To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-03T15:08:10Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective.
Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research.
This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.