Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09007v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:55:22 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation
• Authors: Yining Lu, Dixuan Wang, Tianjian Li, Dongwei Jiang, Daniel Khashabi,
• Abstract summary: creativity consists of at least two key characteristics: emphconvergent thinking (purposefulness to achieve a given goal) and emphdivergent thinking (adaptability to new environments or constraints) citeprunco 2003critical We introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity that incorporates the two characteristics. This is achieved by (1) Denial Prompting pushes LLMs to come up with more creative solutions to a given problem by incrementally imposing new constraints on the previous solution, and (2) defining and computing the NeoGauge metric which examines both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative
• Score: 17.56712029335294
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As LLMs become increasingly prevalent, it is interesting to consider how ``creative'' these models can be. From cognitive science, creativity consists of at least two key characteristics: \emph{convergent} thinking (purposefulness to achieve a given goal) and \emph{divergent} thinking (adaptability to new environments or constraints) \citep{runco2003critical}. In this work, we introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity that incorporates the two characteristics. This is achieved by (1) Denial Prompting pushes LLMs to come up with more creative solutions to a given problem by incrementally imposing new constraints on the previous solution, compelling LLMs to adopt new strategies, and (2) defining and computing the NeoGauge metric which examines both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative responses by LLMs. We apply the proposed framework on Codeforces problems, a natural data source for collecting human coding solutions. We quantify NeoGauge for various proprietary and open-source models and find that even the most creative model, GPT-4, still falls short of demonstrating human-like creativity. We also experiment with advanced reasoning strategies (MCTS, self-correction, etc.) and observe no significant improvement in creativity. As a by-product of our analysis, we release NeoCoder dataset for reproducing our results on future models.

Related papers

• Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoning [42.079040543428036]
  We explore the potential of merging multiple expert models into a single large language model. We propose an unconstrained model merging framework that accommodates both homogeneous and heterogeneous model architectures. Across 7 benchmarks and 9 reasoning-optimized LLMs, we reveal key findings that reasoning emerges from merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:04:07Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Language Models [1.223779595809275]
  We investigate the unintended consequences of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback on the creativity of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our findings have significant implications for marketers who rely on LLMs for creative tasks such as copywriting, ad creation, and customer persona generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T22:14:51Z)
• Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models [37.67363469600804]
  The recent surge in the capabilities of Large Language Models has led to claims that they are approaching a level of creativity akin to human capabilities. We leverage recent advances in creativity science to build a framework for in-depth analysis of divergent creativity in both state-of-the-art LLMs and a substantial dataset of 100,000 humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T22:37:52Z)
• Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Models [33.37237667182931]
  This paper aims to establish an efficient framework for assessing the level of creativity in large language models (LLMs) By adapting the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, the research evaluates the creative performance of various LLMs across 7 tasks. We found that the creativity of LLMs primarily falls short in originality, while excelling in elaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T05:19:47Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
  We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark. In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship. We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z)
• MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers? [87.70522322728581]
  We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a novel constrained setting. We create MACGYVER, an automatically generated dataset consisting of over 1,600 real-world problems. We present our collection to both LLMs and humans to compare and contrast their problem-solving abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:52:27Z)
• The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and Trust [85.75059530612882]
  We propose a reasoning with refinement objective called ART: Ask, Refine, and Trust. It asks necessary questions to decide when an LLM should refine its output. It achieves a performance gain of +5 points over self-refinement baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T07:26:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.