Influencer Self-Disclosure Practices on Instagram: A Multi-Country Longitudinal Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09202v1
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:02:18 GMT
- Title: Influencer Self-Disclosure Practices on Instagram: A Multi-Country Longitudinal Study
- Abstract summary: The study consists of over a million posts by 400 content creators from four countries: the US, Brazil, Netherlands and Germany.
Our study shows differences in the professionalisation of content monetisation between countries, yet consistent patterns.
Significant differences in the disclosure of sponsored content in some countries, with a direct connection with national legislation.
- Score: 6.512258839228367
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a longitudinal study of more than ten years of activity on Instagram consisting of over a million posts by 400 content creators from four countries: the US, Brazil, Netherlands and Germany. Our study shows differences in the professionalisation of content monetisation between countries, yet consistent patterns; significant differences in the frequency of posts yet similar user engagement trends; and significant differences in the disclosure of sponsored content in some countries, with a direct connection with national legislation. We analyse shifts in marketing strategies due to legislative and platform feature changes, focusing on how content creators adapt disclosure methods to different legal environments. We also analyse the impact of disclosures and sponsored posts on engagement and conclude that, although sponsored posts have lower engagement on average, properly disclosing ads does not reduce engagement further. Our observations stress the importance of disclosure compliance and can guide authorities in developing and monitoring them more effectively.
Related papers
- "Talking past each other": Issue ownership and microtargeting in Swiss online political ads [0.3384279376065155]
This paper presents a large-scale, data-driven analysis of 40k political ads published on Facebook and Instagram in Switzerland between 2021 and 2025.<n>It shows that political ads are used not only for federal elections, but also to influence referenda, where greater exposure to pro-Yes'' advertising correlates significantly with approval outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T16:35:02Z) - The Influence of Text Variation on User Engagement in Cross-Platform Content Sharing [24.49226067258647]
This study investigates how rewriting Reddit post titles adapted from YouTube video titles affects user engagement.<n>We build and analyze a large dataset of Reddit posts sharing YouTube videos, revealing that 21% of post titles are minimally modified.<n> Comprehensive statistical tests reveal that effective title rewrites tend to feature emotional resonance, lexical richness, and alignment with community-specific norms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-26T20:38:28Z) - On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - Across Platforms and Languages: Dutch Influencers and Legal Disclosures on Instagram, YouTube and TikTok [6.070078201123852]
This paper proposes a transparent methodology for measuring whether and how influencers comply with disclosures based on legal standards.
We apply this methodology to an original dataset reflecting the content of 150 Dutch influencers publicly registered with the Dutch Media Authority.
We find that influencer marketing remains generally underdisclosed on social media, and that bigger influencers are not necessarily more compliant with disclosure standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T09:59:52Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models to Detect Influence Campaigns in Social
Media [9.58546889761175]
Social media influence campaigns pose significant challenges to public discourse and democracy.
Traditional detection methods fall short due to the complexity and dynamic nature of social media.
We propose a novel detection method using Large Language Models (LLMs) that incorporates both user metadata and network structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T00:25:09Z) - News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal
Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
This study investigated information consumption in four European countries.
It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK.
Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z) - A Multimodal Analysis of Influencer Content on Twitter [40.41635575764701]
Line between personal opinions and commercial content promotion is frequently blurred.
This makes automatic detection of regulatory compliance breaches related to influencer advertising difficult.
We introduce a new Twitter (now X) dataset consisting of 15,998 influencer posts mapped into commercial and non-commercial categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T15:07:23Z) - Personality-Driven Social Multimedia Content Recommendation [68.46899477180837]
We investigate the impact of human personality traits on the content recommendation model by applying a novel personality-driven multi-view content recommender system.
Our experimental results and real-world case study demonstrate not just PersiC's ability to perform efficient human personality-driven multi-view content recommendation, but also allow for actionable digital ad strategy recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-25T14:37:18Z) - Ranking Micro-Influencers: a Novel Multi-Task Learning and Interpretable
Framework [69.5850969606885]
We propose a novel multi-task learning framework to improve the state of the art in micro-influencer ranking based on multimedia content.
We show significant improvement both in terms of accuracy and model complexity.
The techniques for ranking and interpretation presented in this work can be generalised to arbitrary multimedia ranking tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T13:04:25Z) - The Kaleidoscope of Privacy: Differences across French, German, UK, and
US GDPR Media Discourse [0.0]
The European Union passed the General Data Protection Regulation on 25 May 2018.
The research presented here draws on two years of media reporting on topics from French, German UK and US sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-31T12:46:23Z) - Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic.
Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z) - How-to Present News on Social Media: A Causal Analysis of Editing News
Headlines for Boosting User Engagement [14.829079057399838]
We analyze media outlets' current practices using a data-driven approach.
We build a parallel corpus of original news articles and their corresponding tweets that eight media outlets shared.
Then, we explore how those media edited tweets against original headlines and the effects of such changes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-17T06:39:49Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.