Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09519v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:00:21 GMT
• Title: Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency
• Authors: Sakib Shahriar, Brady Lund, Nishith Reddy Mannuru, Muhammad Arbab Arshad, Kadhim Hayawi, Ravi Varma Kumar Bevara, Aashrith Mannuru, Laiba Batool,
• Abstract summary: This research study comprehensively evaluates the language, vision, speech, and multimodal capabilities of GPT-4o. GPT-4o demonstrates high accuracy and efficiency across multiple domains in language and reasoning capabilities. The model shows variability and faces limitations in handling complex and ambiguous inputs.
• Score: 3.161954199291541
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, evaluating their comprehensive capabilities becomes significant for their application in various fields. This research study comprehensively evaluates the language, vision, speech, and multimodal capabilities of GPT-4o. The study employs standardized exam questions, reasoning tasks, and translation assessments to assess the model's language capability. Additionally, GPT-4o's vision and speech capabilities are tested through image classification and object recognition tasks, as well as accent classification. The multimodal evaluation assesses the model's performance in integrating visual and linguistic data. Our findings reveal that GPT-4o demonstrates high accuracy and efficiency across multiple domains in language and reasoning capabilities, excelling in tasks that require few-shot learning. GPT-4o also provides notable improvements in multimodal tasks compared to its predecessors. However, the model shows variability and faces limitations in handling complex and ambiguous inputs, particularly in audio and vision capabilities. This paper highlights the need for more comprehensive benchmarks and robust evaluation frameworks, encompassing qualitative assessments involving human judgment as well as error analysis. Future work should focus on expanding datasets, investigating prompt-based assessment, and enhancing few-shot learning techniques to test the model's practical applicability and performance in real-world scenarios.

Related papers

• Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil's National Undergraduate Computer Science Exam [0.0]
  This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT-4 Vision, OpenAI's most advanced visual model. By presenting the model with the exam's open and multiple-choice questions in their original image format, we were able to evaluate the model's reasoning and self-reflecting capabilities. ChatGPT-4 Vision significantly outperformed the average exam participant, positioning itself within the top 10 best score percentile.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T02:42:30Z)
• Assessing the Aesthetic Evaluation Capabilities of GPT-4 with Vision: Insights from Group and Individual Assessments [2.539875353011627]
  This study investigates the performance of GPT-4 with Vision on the task of aesthetic evaluation of images. We employ two tasks, prediction of the average evaluation values of a group and an individual's evaluation values. Experimental results reveal GPT-4 with Vision's superior performance in predicting aesthetic evaluations and the nature of different responses to beauty and ugliness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T10:27:09Z)
• What Is Missing in Multilingual Visual Reasoning and How to Fix It [64.47951359580556]
  We evaluate NLP models' multilingual, multimodal capabilities by testing on a visual reasoning task. proprietary systems like GPT-4V obtain the best performance on this task now, but open models lag in comparison. Our interventions achieve the best open performance on this task in a zero-shot setting, boosting open model LLaVA by 13.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T05:45:27Z)
• Gemini vs GPT-4V: A Preliminary Comparison and Combination of Vision-Language Models Through Qualitative Cases [98.35348038111508]
  This paper presents an in-depth comparative study of two pioneering models: Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4V(ision) The core of our analysis delves into the distinct visual comprehension abilities of each model. Our findings illuminate the unique strengths and niches of both models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T18:59:58Z)
• Evaluating GPT-4's Vision Capabilities on Brazilian University Admission Exams [14.801853435122908]
  We present a framework to evaluate language models on entrance exams, which incorporates both textual and visual elements. We evaluate the two most recent editions of Exame Nacional do Ensino M'edio (ENEM), the main standardized entrance examination adopted by Brazilian universities. One of the highlights is that text captions transcribing visual content outperform the direct use of images, suggesting that the vision model has room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T19:20:59Z)
• GPT-4V(ision) as a Generalist Evaluator for Vision-Language Tasks [70.98062518872999]
  We validate GPT-4V's capabilities for evaluation purposes, addressing tasks ranging from foundational image-to-text and text-to-image synthesis to high-level image-to-image translations and multi-images to text alignment. Notably, GPT-4V shows promising agreement with humans across various tasks and evaluation methods, demonstrating immense potential for multi-modal LLMs as evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T16:11:09Z)
• Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text. A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond [7.760124498553333]
  We study whether vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently. We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting. We introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:45:11Z)
• The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision) [121.42924593374127]
  We analyze the latest model, GPT-4V, to deepen the understanding of LMMs. GPT-4V's unprecedented ability in processing arbitrarily interleaved multimodal inputs makes it a powerful multimodal generalist system. GPT-4V's unique capability of understanding visual markers drawn on input images can give rise to new human-computer interaction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:34:51Z)
• Exploring the Trade-Offs: Unified Large Language Models vs Local Fine-Tuned Models for Highly-Specific Radiology NLI Task [49.50140712943701]
  We evaluate the performance of ChatGPT/GPT-4 on a radiology NLI task and compare it to other models fine-tuned specifically on task-related data samples. We also conduct a comprehensive investigation on ChatGPT/GPT-4's reasoning ability by introducing varying levels of inference difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T17:21:48Z)
• TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language Processing [73.16475763422446]
  We propose a multilingual robustness evaluation platform for NLP tasks (TextFlint) It incorporates universal text transformation, task-specific transformation, adversarial attack, subpopulation, and their combinations to provide comprehensive robustness analysis. TextFlint generates complete analytical reports as well as targeted augmented data to address the shortcomings of the model's robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T17:20:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.