Large Language Models for Integrating Social Determinant of Health Data: A Case Study on Heart Failure 30-Day Readmission Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09688v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:14:06 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models for Integrating Social Determinant of Health Data: A Case Study on Heart Failure 30-Day Readmission Prediction
• Authors: Chase Fensore, Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco, Shivani A. Patel, Alanna A. Morris, Joyce C. Ho,
• Abstract summary: Social determinants of health (SDOH) play an important role in health outcomes. Recent open data initiatives present an opportunity to construct a more comprehensive view of SDOH. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise at automatically annotating structured data.
• Score: 4.042918413611158
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social determinants of health (SDOH) $-$ the myriad of circumstances in which people live, grow, and age $-$ play an important role in health outcomes. However, existing outcome prediction models often only use proxies of SDOH as features. Recent open data initiatives present an opportunity to construct a more comprehensive view of SDOH, but manually integrating the most relevant data for individual patients becomes increasingly challenging as the volume and diversity of public SDOH data grows. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise at automatically annotating structured data. Here, we conduct an end-to-end case study evaluating the feasibility of using LLMs to integrate SDOH data, and the utility of these SDOH features for clinical prediction. We first manually label 700+ variables from two publicly-accessible SDOH data sources to one of five semantic SDOH categories. Then, we benchmark performance of 9 open-source LLMs on this classification task. Finally, we train ML models to predict 30-day hospital readmission among 39k heart failure (HF) patients, and we compare the prediction performance of the categorized SDOH variables with standard clinical variables. Additionally, we investigate the impact of few-shot LLM prompting on LLM annotation performance, and perform a metadata ablation study on prompts to evaluate which information helps LLMs accurately annotate these variables. We find that some open-source LLMs can effectively, accurately annotate SDOH variables with zero-shot prompting without the need for fine-tuning. Crucially, when combined with standard clinical features, the LLM-annotated Neighborhood and Built Environment subset of the SDOH variables shows the best performance predicting 30-day readmission of HF patients.

Related papers

• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science. Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• Developing Healthcare Language Model Embedding Spaces [0.20971479389679337]
  Pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle on out-of-domain datasets like healthcare focused text. Three methods are assessed: traditional masked language modeling, Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representations (DeCLUTR) and a novel pre-training objective utilizing metadata categories from the healthcare settings. Contrastively trained models outperform other approaches on the classification tasks, delivering strong performance from limited labeled data and with fewer model parameter updates required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:31:32Z)
• Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [61.89754499292561]
  We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs. To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Clinical Prediction with Structured Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Data [7.815738943706123]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally tailored for natural language processing. This research investigates the adaptability of LLMs, like GPT-4, to EHR data. In response to the longitudinal, sparse, and knowledge-infused nature of EHR data, our prompting approach involves taking into account specific characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T20:14:50Z)
• SDOH-NLI: a Dataset for Inferring Social Determinants of Health from Clinical Notes [13.991819517682574]
  Social and behavioral determinants of health (SDOH) play a significant role in shaping health outcomes. Progress on using NLP methods for this task has been hindered by the lack of high-quality publicly available labeled data. This paper introduces a new dataset, SDOH-NLI, that is based on publicly available notes and which we release publicly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T19:09:30Z)
• Retrieving Evidence from EHRs with LLMs: Possibilities and Challenges [18.56314471146199]
  Large volume of notes often associated with patients together with time constraints renders manually identifying relevant evidence practically infeasible. We propose and evaluate a zero-shot strategy for using LLMs as a mechanism to efficiently retrieve and summarize unstructured evidence in patient EHR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T18:44:47Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• DCID: Deep Canonical Information Decomposition [84.59396326810085]
  We consider the problem of identifying the signal shared between two one-dimensional target variables. We propose ICM, an evaluation metric which can be used in the presence of ground-truth labels. We also propose Deep Canonical Information Decomposition (DCID) - a simple, yet effective approach for learning the shared variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T16:59:06Z)
• Evaluating the Impact of Social Determinants on Health Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit [10.764842579064636]
  Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a crucial role in a person's health and well-being. Most risk prediction models based on electronic health records do not incorporate a comprehensive set of SDOH features. Our work links a publicly available EHR database, MIMIC-IV, to well-documented SDOH features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T01:27:51Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.