Popular News Always Compete for the User's Attention! POPK: Mitigating Popularity Bias via a Temporal-Counterfactual

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09939v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 16:32:16 GMT
• Title: Popular News Always Compete for the User's Attention! POPK: Mitigating Popularity Bias via a Temporal-Counterfactual
• Authors: Igor L. R. Azevedo, Toyotaro Suzumura, Yuichiro Yasui,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents POPK, a new method that uses temporal-counterfactual analysis to mitigate the influence of popular news articles. We tested POPK on three different language datasets (Japanese, English, and Norwegian) and found that it successfully enhances traditional methods.
• Score: 1.6488226958404897
• License:
• Abstract: In news recommendation systems, reducing popularity bias is essential for delivering accurate and diverse recommendations. This paper presents POPK, a new method that uses temporal-counterfactual analysis to mitigate the influence of popular news articles. By asking, "What if, at a given time $t$, a set of popular news articles were competing for the user's attention to be clicked?", POPK aims to improve recommendation accuracy and diversity. We tested POPK on three different language datasets (Japanese, English, and Norwegian) and found that it successfully enhances traditional methods. POPK offers flexibility for customization to enhance either accuracy or diversity, alongside providing distinct ways of measuring popularity. We argue that popular news articles always compete for attention, even if they are not explicitly present in the user's impression list. POPK systematically eliminates the implicit influence of popular news articles during each training step. We combine counterfactual reasoning with a temporal approach to adjust the negative sample space, refining understanding of user interests. Our findings underscore how POPK effectively enhances the accuracy and diversity of recommended articles while also tailoring the approach to specific needs.

Related papers

• Prompt-and-Align: Prompt-Based Social Alignment for Few-Shot Fake News Detection [50.07850264495737]
  "Prompt-and-Align" (P&A) is a novel prompt-based paradigm for few-shot fake news detection. We show that P&A sets new states-of-the-art for few-shot fake news detection performance by significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:19:43Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Towards Proactively Forecasting Sentence-Specific Information Popularity within Online News Documents [13.537665342333488]
  We introduce the task of proactively forecasting popularities of sentences within online news documents. For training our models, we curate InfoPop, the first dataset containing popularity labels for over 1.7 million sentences. We propose a novel transfer learning approach involving sentence salience prediction as an auxiliary task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-31T08:40:08Z)
• IGNiteR: News Recommendation in Microblogging Applications (Extended Version) [3.2108350580418166]
  We propose a deep-learning based approach that is diffusion and influence-aware, called Influence-Graph News Recommender (IGNiteR) To represent the news, a multi-level attention-based encoder is used to reveal the different interests of users. We perform extensive experiments on two real-world datasets, showing that IGNiteR outperforms the state-of-the-art deep-learning based news recommendation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T22:33:58Z)
• Two-Stage Neural Contextual Bandits for Personalised News Recommendation [50.3750507789989]
  Existing personalised news recommendation methods focus on exploiting user interests and ignores exploration in recommendation. We build on contextual bandits recommendation strategies which naturally address the exploitation-exploration trade-off. We use deep learning representations for users and news, and generalise the neural upper confidence bound (UCB) policies to generalised additive UCB and bilinear UCB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-26T12:07:56Z)
• Reconciling the Quality vs Popularity Dichotomy in Online Cultural Markets [62.146882023375746]
  We propose a model of an idealized online cultural market in which $N$ items, endowed with a hidden quality metric, are recommended to users by a ranking algorithm possibly biased by the current items' popularity. Our goal is to better understand the underlying mechanisms of the well-known fact that popularity bias can prevent higher-quality items from becoming more popular than lower-quality items, producing an undesirable misalignment between quality and popularity rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T14:36:11Z)
• The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendation [0.0]
  Popularity bias refers to the problem that popular items are recommended frequently while less popular items are recommended rarely or not at all. We analyze the well-known Book-Crossing dataset and define three user groups based on their tendency towards popular items. Our results indicate that most state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms suffer from popularity bias in the book domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T20:21:46Z)
• A News Recommender System Considering Temporal Dynamics and Diversity [0.0]
  In a news recommender system, a reader's preferences change over time. Some preferences drift quite abruptly (short-term preferences), while others change over a longer period of time. Our system should be able to: (i) accommodate the dynamics in reader behavior; and (ii) consider both accuracy and diversity in the design of the recommendation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T13:45:34Z)
• User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [4.30484058393522]
  Recommendation and ranking systems suffer from popularity bias; the tendency of the algorithm to favor a few popular items while under-representing the majority of other items. In this paper, we show the limitations of the existing metrics to evaluate popularity bias mitigation when we want to assess these algorithms from the users' perspective. We present an effective approach that mitigates popularity bias from the user-centered point of view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T22:12:51Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.