Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10247v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:07:18 GMT
- Title: Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer
- Authors: Marc Schmitt,
- Abstract summary: I explore the role of the Chief AI Officer (CAIO) within the C-suite, emphasizing the necessity of this position for successful AI strategy, integration, and governance.
I analyze future scenarios based on current trends in three key areas: the AI Economy, AI Organization, and Competition in the Age of AI.
This paper advances the discussion on AI leadership by providing a rationale for the strategic integration of AI at the executive level and examining the role of the Chief AI Officer within organizations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into corporate strategy has become a pivotal focus for organizations aiming to maintain a competitive advantage in the digital age. As AI reshapes business operations and drives innovation, the need for specialized leadership to effectively manage these changes becomes increasingly apparent. In this paper, I explore the role of the Chief AI Officer (CAIO) within the C-suite, emphasizing the necessity of this position for successful AI strategy, integration, and governance. I analyze future scenarios based on current trends in three key areas: the AI Economy, AI Organization, and Competition in the Age of AI. These explorations lay the foundation for identifying the antecedents (environmental, structural, and strategic factors) that justify the inclusion of a CAIO in top management teams. This sets the stage for a comprehensive examination of the CAIO's role and the broader implications of AI leadership. This paper advances the discussion on AI leadership by providing a rationale for the strategic integration of AI at the executive level and examining the role of the Chief AI Officer within organizations.
Related papers
- Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - AI Governance and Accountability: An Analysis of Anthropic's Claude [0.0]
This paper examines the AI governance landscape, focusing on Anthropic's Claude, a foundational AI model.
We analyze Claude through the lens of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and the EU AI Act, identifying potential threats and proposing mitigation strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T23:37:06Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance [8.658519485150423]
We show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game.
We propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance.
To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T08:18:42Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational
AI Governance [0.0]
We present an AI governance framework, which targets organizations that develop and use AI systems.
The framework is designed to help organizations deploying AI systems translate ethical AI principles into practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-01T08:55:27Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - aiSTROM -- A roadmap for developing a successful AI strategy [3.5788754401889014]
A total of 34% of AI research and development projects fails or are abandoned, according to a recent survey by Rackspace Technology.
We propose a new strategic framework, aiSTROM, that empowers managers to create a successful AI strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T08:40:15Z) - AI Governance for Businesses [2.072259480917207]
It aims at leveraging AI through effective use of data and minimization of AI-related cost and risk.
This work views AI products as systems, where key functionality is delivered by machine learning (ML) models leveraging (training) data.
Our framework decomposes AI governance into governance of data, (ML) models and (AI) systems along four dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-20T22:31:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.