Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10247v2
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:54:27 GMT
• Title: Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer
• Authors: Marc Schmitt,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines future scenarios across three domains: the AI Economy, the AI Organization, and Competition in the Age of AI.<n>The paper develops a theory-informed framework for the Chief AI Officer (CAIO)<n>This conceptualization clarifies the CAIOs unique role within the executive landscape and presents a forward-looking research agenda.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into corporate strategy has become critical for organizations seeking to maintain a competitive advantage in the digital age. As AI transforms business models, operations, and decision-making, the need for dedicated executive leadership to guide, govern, and orchestrate this transformation becomes increasingly evident. This paper examines emerging future scenarios across three domains: the AI Economy, the AI Organization, and Competition in the Age of AI. These domains reveal environmental, structural, and strategic tensions that existing C-suite roles struggle to resolve. In response, the paper develops a theory-informed framework for the Chief AI Officer (CAIO), outlining the distinct functions and capabilities required to guide and govern AI at scale. Drawing on illustrative cases and emerging practice, this conceptualization clarifies the CAIOs unique role within the executive landscape and presents a forward-looking research agenda. This paper advances the discourse on AI leadership by offering a theory-driven rationale for the strategic integration of AI at the executive level and by positioning the Chief AI Officer as a distinct and necessary role within modern organizations.

Related papers

• Agentic AI in Product Management: A Co-Evolutionary Model [0.0]
  This study explores agentic AI's transformative role in product management.<n>It proposes a conceptual co-evolutionary framework to guide its integration across the product lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T02:32:32Z)
• AI is the Strategy: From Agentic AI to Autonomous Business Models onto Strategy in the Age of AI [0.0]
  We argue that we are now entering a phase where agentic AI can execute the core mechanisms of value creation, delivery, and capture.<n>This shift reframes AI not as a tool to support strategy, but as the strategy itself.<n>We show how ABMs reshape competitive advantage through agentic execution, continuous adaptation, and the gradual offloading of human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T11:11:06Z)
• Perceptions of Agentic AI in Organizations: Implications for Responsible AI and ROI [0.0]
  This paper investigates how organizations perceive and adapt such frameworks amidst the emerging landscape of agentic AI. Findings highlight that the inherent complexity of agentic AI systems and their responsible implementation, rooted in the intricate interconnectedness of responsible AI dimensions and the thematic framework, contribute to significant challenges in organizational adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T19:15:06Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict. Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers. We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Overview of AI and Communication for 6G Network: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Future Research Opportunities [148.601430677814]
  This paper presents a comprehensive overview of AI and communication for 6G networks. We first review the driving factors behind incorporating AI into wireless communications, as well as the vision for the convergence of AI and 6G. The discourse then transitions to a detailed exposition of the envisioned integration of AI within 6G networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T05:36:34Z)
• The Game-Theoretic Symbiosis of Trust and AI in Networked Systems [13.343937277604892]
  This chapter explores the symbiotic relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and trust in networked systems. We investigate how trust, when dynamically managed through AI, can form a resilient security ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T21:04:53Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Ethical Leadership in the Age of AI Challenges, Opportunities and Framework for Ethical Leadership [2.666704793226655]
  Ethical leadership plays a central role in guiding organizations in facing those challenges and maximizing on those opportunities. This article explores the essence of ethical leadership in the age of AI, starting with a simplified introduction of ethical leadership and AI. The opportunities for ethical leadership in the age of AI answers the question: What actionable strategies can leaders employ to address the challenges and leverage opportunities?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T10:17:19Z)
• Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, yet its adoption is often hindered by concerns about data privacy, security, and the understanding of AI capabilities. This paper synthesizes AI governance approaches, strategic themes, and enablers and challenges for AI adoption by reviewing national AI strategies from leading nations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:00:42Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors [1.1060425537315088]
  This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI) may impact the strategic decision-making (SDM) process in firms. We illustrate how AI could augment existing SDM tools and provide empirical evidence from a leading accelerator program and a startup competition. We examine implications for key cognitive processes underlying SDM -- search, representation, and aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T15:46:15Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance [8.658519485150423]
  We show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game. We propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:18:42Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.