$\texttt{MixGR}$: Enhancing Retriever Generalization for Scientific Domain through Complementary Granularity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10691v2
• Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:08:31 GMT
• Title: $\texttt{MixGR}$: Enhancing Retriever Generalization for Scientific Domain through Complementary Granularity
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces $texttMixGR$, which improves dense retrievers' awareness of query-document matching. $texttMixGR$ fuses various metrics based on granularities to a united score that reflects a comprehensive query-document similarity.
• Score: 88.78750571970232
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies show the growing significance of document retrieval in the generation of LLMs, i.e., RAG, within the scientific domain by bridging their knowledge gap. However, dense retrievers often struggle with domain-specific retrieval and complex query-document relationships, particularly when query segments correspond to various parts of a document. To alleviate such prevalent challenges, this paper introduces $\texttt{MixGR}$, which improves dense retrievers' awareness of query-document matching across various levels of granularity in queries and documents using a zero-shot approach. $\texttt{MixGR}$ fuses various metrics based on these granularities to a united score that reflects a comprehensive query-document similarity. Our experiments demonstrate that $\texttt{MixGR}$ outperforms previous document retrieval by 24.7%, 9.8%, and 6.9% on nDCG@5 with unsupervised, supervised, and LLM-based retrievers, respectively, averaged on queries containing multiple subqueries from five scientific retrieval datasets. Moreover, the efficacy of two downstream scientific question-answering tasks highlights the advantage of $\texttt{MixGR}$ to boost the application of LLMs in the scientific domain. The code and experimental datasets are available.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Abstract Tree for Cross-Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.338186852016847]
  $$-RAG is a tree-RAG framework with two key components.<n>It supports diverse tasks from token-level question answering to document-level summarization.<n>It outperforms RAPTOR by 25.9% and HippoRAG 2 by 7.4% in average F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T09:06:23Z)
• SAGE: Benchmarking and Improving Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [60.53966065867568]
  We introduce SAGE, a benchmark for scientific literature retrieval comprising 1,200 queries across four scientific domains, with a 200,000 paper retrieval corpus.<n>We evaluate six deep research agents and find that all systems struggle with reasoning-intensive retrieval.<n> BM25 significantly outperforms LLM-based retrievers by approximately 30%, as existing agents generate keyword-oriented sub-queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:25:24Z)
• Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
  RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z)
• Learning More Effective Representations for Dense Retrieval through Deliberate Thinking Before Search [65.53881294642451]
  Deliberate Thinking based Dense Retriever (DEBATER) DEBATER enhances recent dense retrievers by enabling them to learn more effective document representations through a step-by-step thinking process. Experimental results show that DEBATER significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:56:34Z)
• GeAR: Generation Augmented Retrieval [82.20696567697016]
  Document retrieval techniques form the foundation for the development of large-scale information systems. The prevailing methodology is to construct a bi-encoder and compute the semantic similarity. We propose a new method called $textbfGe$neration that incorporates well-designed fusion and decoding modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T05:29:00Z)
• Optimizing Query Generation for Enhanced Document Retrieval in RAG [53.10369742545479]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various language tasks but they often generate incorrect information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to mitigate this by using document retrieval for accurate responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:50:32Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  Many complex real-world queries require in-depth reasoning to identify relevant documents. We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents. Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• R^2AG: Incorporating Retrieval Information into Retrieval Augmented Generation [11.890598082534577]
  Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) has been applied in many scenarios to augment large language models (LLMs) with external documents provided by retrievers. This paper proposes R$2$AG, a novel enhanced RAG framework that incorporates Retrieval information into Retrieval Augmented Generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T06:19:48Z)
• DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering [4.364937306005719]
  RAG has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA) We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query. A two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:15:33Z)
• Progressive Query Expansion for Retrieval Over Cost-constrained Data Sources [6.109188517569139]
  ProQE is a progressive query expansion algorithm that iteratively expands the query as it retrieves more documents. Our results show that ProQE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 37% and is the most cost-effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T10:30:19Z)
• PromptReps: Prompting Large Language Models to Generate Dense and Sparse Representations for Zero-Shot Document Retrieval [76.50690734636477]
  We propose PromptReps, which combines the advantages of both categories: no need for training and the ability to retrieve from the whole corpus. The retrieval system harnesses both dense text embedding and sparse bag-of-words representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:51:30Z)
• DAPR: A Benchmark on Document-Aware Passage Retrieval [57.45793782107218]
  We propose and name this task emphDocument-Aware Passage Retrieval (DAPR) While analyzing the errors of the State-of-The-Art (SoTA) passage retrievers, we find the major errors (53.5%) are due to missing document context. Our created benchmark enables future research on developing and comparing retrieval systems for the new task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T10:39:57Z)
• Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Models [69.9707552694766]
  The proposed method first generates pseudo- documents by few-shot prompting large language models (LLMs) query2doc boosts the performance of BM25 by 3% to 15% on ad-hoc IR datasets. Our method also benefits state-of-the-art dense retrievers in terms of both in-domain and out-of-domain results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T07:27:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.