Bridging Data Gaps in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Transfer Learning in Biomedical Data Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11034v1
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:34:20 GMT
- Title: Bridging Data Gaps in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Transfer Learning in Biomedical Data Analysis
- Authors: Siqi Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Di Miao, Mingcheng Zhu, Mengying Yan, Yuhe Ke, Danny D'Agostino, Yilin Ning, Qiming Wu, Ziwen Wang, Yuqing Shang, Molei Liu, Chuan Hong, Nan Liu,
- Abstract summary: Clinical and biomedical research in low-resource settings often faces challenges due to the need for high-quality data with sufficient sample sizes to construct effective models.
These constraints hinder robust model training and prompt researchers to seek methods for leveraging existing knowledge from related studies to support new research efforts.
Transfer learning (TL), a machine learning technique, emerges as a powerful solution by utilizing knowledge from pre-trained models to enhance the performance of new models.
- Score: 10.185052276452867
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Clinical and biomedical research in low-resource settings often faces significant challenges due to the need for high-quality data with sufficient sample sizes to construct effective models. These constraints hinder robust model training and prompt researchers to seek methods for leveraging existing knowledge from related studies to support new research efforts. Transfer learning (TL), a machine learning technique, emerges as a powerful solution by utilizing knowledge from pre-trained models to enhance the performance of new models, offering promise across various healthcare domains. Despite its conceptual origins in the 1990s, the application of TL in medical research has remained limited, especially beyond image analysis. In our review of TL applications in structured clinical and biomedical data, we screened 3,515 papers, with 55 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among these, only 2% (one out of 55) utilized external studies, and 7% (four out of 55) addressed scenarios involving multi-site collaborations with privacy constraints. To achieve actionable TL with structured medical data while addressing regional disparities, inequality, and privacy constraints in healthcare research, we advocate for the careful identification of appropriate source data and models, the selection of suitable TL frameworks, and the validation of TL models with proper baselines.
Related papers
- A foundation model for human-AI collaboration in medical literature mining [27.473923366948032]
We present LEADS, an AI foundation model for study search, screening, and data extraction from medical literature.
The model is trained on 633,759 instruction data points in LEADSInstruct, curated from 21,335 systematic reviews, 453,625 clinical trial publications, and 27,015 clinical trial registries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-27T17:55:37Z) - Knowledge Hierarchy Guided Biological-Medical Dataset Distillation for Domain LLM Training [10.701353329227722]
We propose a framework that automates the distillation of high-quality textual training data from the extensive scientific literature.
Our approach self-evaluates and generates questions that are more closely aligned with the biomedical domain.
Our approach substantially improves question-answering tasks compared to pre-trained models from the life sciences domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-25T07:20:44Z) - A Survey for Large Language Models in Biomedicine [31.719451674137844]
This review is based on an analysis of 484 publications sourced from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and arXiv.
We explore the capabilities of LLMs in zero-shot learning across a broad spectrum of biomedical tasks, including diagnostic assistance, drug discovery, and personalized medicine.
We discuss the challenges that LLMs face in the biomedicine domain including data privacy concerns, limited model interpretability, issues with dataset quality, and ethics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T12:39:16Z) - GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals.
GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date.
It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z) - A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series [3.845248204742053]
Data-driven models have tremendous potential to assist clinical diagnosis and improve patient care.
An emerging approach to overcome the scarcity of labeled data is to augment AI methods with human-like capabilities to learn new tasks with limited examples, called few-shot learning.
This survey provides a comprehensive review and comparison of few-shot learning methods for biomedical time series applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T21:22:27Z) - Towards a clinically accessible radiology foundation model: open-access and lightweight, with automated evaluation [113.5002649181103]
Training open-source small multimodal models (SMMs) to bridge competency gaps for unmet clinical needs in radiology.
For training, we assemble a large dataset of over 697 thousand radiology image-text pairs.
For evaluation, we propose CheXprompt, a GPT-4-based metric for factuality evaluation, and demonstrate its parity with expert evaluation.
The inference of LlaVA-Rad is fast and can be performed on a single V100 GPU in private settings, offering a promising state-of-the-art tool for real-world clinical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T18:12:02Z) - PathLDM: Text conditioned Latent Diffusion Model for Histopathology [62.970593674481414]
We introduce PathLDM, the first text-conditioned Latent Diffusion Model tailored for generating high-quality histopathology images.
Our approach fuses image and textual data to enhance the generation process.
We achieved a SoTA FID score of 7.64 for text-to-image generation on the TCGA-BRCA dataset, significantly outperforming the closest text-conditioned competitor with FID 30.1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T22:08:32Z) - LifeLonger: A Benchmark for Continual Disease Classification [59.13735398630546]
We introduce LifeLonger, a benchmark for continual disease classification on the MedMNIST collection.
Task and class incremental learning of diseases address the issue of classifying new samples without re-training the models from scratch.
Cross-domain incremental learning addresses the issue of dealing with datasets originating from different institutions while retaining the previously obtained knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T12:25:05Z) - FLOP: Federated Learning on Medical Datasets using Partial Networks [84.54663831520853]
COVID-19 Disease due to the novel coronavirus has caused a shortage of medical resources.
Different data-driven deep learning models have been developed to mitigate the diagnosis of COVID-19.
The data itself is still scarce due to patient privacy concerns.
We propose a simple yet effective algorithm, named textbfFederated textbfL textbfon Medical datasets using textbfPartial Networks (FLOP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T01:56:58Z) - Select-ProtoNet: Learning to Select for Few-Shot Disease Subtype
Prediction [55.94378672172967]
We focus on few-shot disease subtype prediction problem, identifying subgroups of similar patients.
We introduce meta learning techniques to develop a new model, which can extract the common experience or knowledge from interrelated clinical tasks.
Our new model is built upon a carefully designed meta-learner, called Prototypical Network, that is a simple yet effective meta learning machine for few-shot image classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-02T02:50:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.