Thorns and Algorithms: Navigating Generative AI Challenges Inspired by Giraffes and Acacias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11360v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 03:53:25 GMT
• Title: Thorns and Algorithms: Navigating Generative AI Challenges Inspired by Giraffes and Acacias
• Authors: Waqar Hussain,
• Abstract summary: The interplay between humans and Generative AI (Gen AI) draws an insightful parallel with the dynamic relationship between giraffes and acacias on the African Savannah. This paper explores how, like young giraffes that are still mastering their environment, humans are in the early stages of adapting to and shaping Gen AI. It delves into the strategies humans are developing and refining to help mitigate risks such as bias, misinformation, and privacy breaches.
• Score: 1.3882452134471353
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The interplay between humans and Generative AI (Gen AI) draws an insightful parallel with the dynamic relationship between giraffes and acacias on the African Savannah. Just as giraffes navigate the acacia's thorny defenses to gain nourishment, humans engage with Gen AI, maneuvering through ethical and operational challenges to harness its benefits. This paper explores how, like young giraffes that are still mastering their environment, humans are in the early stages of adapting to and shaping Gen AI. It delves into the strategies humans are developing and refining to help mitigate risks such as bias, misinformation, and privacy breaches, that influence and shape Gen AI's evolution. While the giraffe-acacia analogy aptly frames human-AI relations, it contrasts nature's evolutionary perfection with the inherent flaws of human-made technology and the tendency of humans to misuse it, giving rise to many ethical dilemmas. Through the HHH framework we identify pathways to embed values of helpfulness, honesty, and harmlessness in AI development, fostering safety-aligned agents that resonate with human values. This narrative presents a cautiously optimistic view of human resilience and adaptability, illustrating our capacity to harness technologies and implement safeguards effectively, without succumbing to their perils. It emphasises a symbiotic relationship where humans and AI continually shape each other for mutual benefit.

Related papers

• Serious Games: Human-AI Interaction, Evolution, and Coevolution [0.0]
  The objective of this work was to examine some of the EGT models relevant to human-AI interaction, evolution, and coevolution.<n>The Hawk-Dove Game predicts balanced mixed-strategy equilibria based on the costs of conflict.<n>Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma suggests that repeated interaction may lead to cognitive coevolution.<n>The War of Attrition suggests that competition for resources may result in strategic coevolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T08:41:37Z)
• What Human-Horse Interactions may Teach us About Effective Human-AI Interactions [0.5893124686141781]
  We argue that AI, like horses, should complement rather than replace human capabilities. We analyze key elements of human-horse relationships: trust, communication, and mutual adaptability. We offer a vision for designing AI systems that are trustworthy, adaptable, and capable of fostering symbiotic human-AI partnerships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T00:39:16Z)
• "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
  We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI. anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z)
• Shifting the Human-AI Relationship: Toward a Dynamic Relational Learning-Partner Model [0.0]
  We advocate for a shift toward viewing AI as a learning partner, akin to a student who learns from interactions with humans. We suggest that a "third mind" emerges through collaborative human-AI relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:19:39Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety [6.100304850888953]
  We argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. We propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:52:00Z)
• The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
  This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems. It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI. It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z)
• Discriminatory or Samaritan -- which AI is needed for humanity? An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis of Hybrid Human-AI populations [0.5308606035361203]
  We study how different forms of AI influence the evolution of cooperation in a human population playing the one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma game. We found that Samaritan AI agents that help everyone unconditionally, including defectors, can promote higher levels of cooperation in humans than Discriminatory AIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-30T15:56:26Z)
• Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
  Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z)
• Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans [18.750116414606698]
  We argue that the most successful AI agents will likely have undesirable traits. If such agents have intelligence that exceeds that of humans, this could lead to humanity losing control of its future. To counteract these risks and evolutionary forces, we consider interventions such as carefully designing AI agents' intrinsic motivations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:59:12Z)
• Learning to Influence Human Behavior with Offline Reinforcement Learning [70.7884839812069]
  We focus on influence in settings where there is a need to capture human suboptimality. Experiments online with humans is potentially unsafe, and creating a high-fidelity simulator of the environment is often impractical. We show that offline reinforcement learning can learn to effectively influence suboptimal humans by extending and combining elements of observed human-human behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T23:41:55Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.