"It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11978v1
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 11:49:05 GMT
- Title: "It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts
- Authors: Hubert D. ZajÄ…c, Jorge M. N. Ribeiro, Silvia Ingala, Simona Gentile, Ruth Wanjohi, Samuel N. Gitau, Jonathan F. Carlsen, Michael B. Nielsen, Tariq O. Andersen,
- Abstract summary: This paper explores how to design AI for clinical usefulness in different contexts.
We conducted 19 design sessions with 13 radiologists from 7 clinical sites in Denmark and Kenya.
We conceptualised four technical dimensions that must be configured to the intended clinical context.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) repeatedly match or outperform radiologists in lab experiments. However, real-world implementations of radiological AI-based systems are found to provide little to no clinical value. This paper explores how to design AI for clinical usefulness in different contexts. We conducted 19 design sessions and design interventions with 13 radiologists from 7 clinical sites in Denmark and Kenya, based on three iterations of a functional AI-based prototype. Ten sociotechnical dependencies were identified as crucial for the design of AI in radiology. We conceptualised four technical dimensions that must be configured to the intended clinical context of use: AI functionality, AI medical focus, AI decision threshold, and AI Explainability. We present four design recommendations on how to address dependencies pertaining to the medical knowledge, clinic type, user expertise level, patient context, and user situation that condition the configuration of these technical dimensions.
Related papers
- FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI.
This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z) - HEAR4Health: A blueprint for making computer audition a staple of modern
healthcare [89.8799665638295]
Recent years have seen a rapid increase in digital medicine research in an attempt to transform traditional healthcare systems.
Computer audition can be seen to be lagging behind, at least in terms of commercial interest.
We categorise the advances needed in four key pillars: Hear, corresponding to the cornerstone technologies needed to analyse auditory signals in real-life conditions; Earlier, for the advances needed in computational and data efficiency; Attentively, for accounting to individual differences and handling the longitudinal nature of medical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-25T09:25:08Z) - Current State of Community-Driven Radiological AI Deployment in Medical
Imaging [1.474525456020066]
This report represents several years of weekly discussions and hands-on problem solving experience by groups of industry experts and clinicians in the MONAI Consortium.
We identify barriers between AI-model development in research labs and subsequent clinical deployment.
We discuss various AI integration points in a clinical Radiology workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-29T05:17:59Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Routine Usage of AI-based Chest X-ray Reading Support in a Multi-site
Medical Supply Center [64.91941409801494]
A commercially available AI solution for the evaluation of Chest X-ray images is able to help radiologists and clinical colleagues 24/7 in a complex environment.
The system performs in a robust manner, supporting radiologists and clinical colleagues in their important decisions, in practises and hospitals regardless of the user and X-ray system type producing the image-data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-17T08:06:16Z) - Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in
Clinical Imaging [24.911186503082465]
This study explores the effects of providing AI assistance at the start of a diagnostic session in radiology versus after the radiologist has made a provisional decision.
We found that participants who are asked to register provisional responses in advance of reviewing AI inferences are less likely to agree with the AI regardless of whether the advice is accurate and, in instances of disagreement with the AI, are less likely to seek the second opinion of a colleague.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T16:59:25Z) - Evaluating Explainable AI on a Multi-Modal Medical Imaging Task: Can
Existing Algorithms Fulfill Clinical Requirements? [42.75635888823057]
Heatmap is a form of explanation that highlights important features for AI models' prediction.
It is unknown how well heatmaps perform on explaining decisions on multi-modal medical images.
We propose the modality-specific feature importance (MSFI) metric to tackle this clinically important but technically ignored problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-12T17:18:16Z) - VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data
for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow.
We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence.
We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z) - Explainable AI For COVID-19 CT Classifiers: An Initial Comparison Study [3.4031539425106683]
Explainable AI (XAI) is the key to unlocking AI and the black-box for deep learning.
Chest CT has emerged as a valuable tool for the clinical diagnostic and treatment management of the lung diseases associated with COVID-19.
The aim of this study is to propose and develop XAI strategies for COVID-19 classification models with an investigation of comparison.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-25T23:39:14Z) - Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support for COVID-19 --
Where Art Thou? [19.068540069452347]
We identify opportunities and requirements for AI-based clinical decision support systems.
We highlight challenges that impact "AI readiness" for rapidly emergent healthcare challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T13:34:47Z) - Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Imaging Data
Acquisition, Segmentation and Diagnosis for COVID-19 [71.41929762209328]
The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading all over the world.
Medical imaging such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT) plays an essential role in the global fight against COVID-19.
The recently emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies further strengthen the power of the imaging tools and help medical specialists.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-06T15:21:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.