The Honorific Effect: Exploring the Impact of Japanese Linguistic Formalities on AI-Generated Physics Explanations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13787v2
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 04:57:55 GMT
- Title: The Honorific Effect: Exploring the Impact of Japanese Linguistic Formalities on AI-Generated Physics Explanations
- Authors: Keisuke Sato,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates the influence of Japanese honorifics on the responses of large language models (LLMs) when explaining the law of conservation of momentum.
We analyzed the outputs of six state-of-the-art AI models, including variations of ChatGPT, Coral, and Gemini, using 14 different honorific forms.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This study investigates the influence of Japanese honorifics on the responses of large language models (LLMs) when explaining the law of conservation of momentum. We analyzed the outputs of six state-of-the-art AI models, including variations of ChatGPT, Coral, and Gemini, using 14 different honorific forms. Our findings reveal that honorifics significantly affect the quality, consistency, and formality of AI-generated responses, demonstrating LLMs' ability to interpret and adapt to social context cues embedded in language. Notable variations were observed across different models, with some emphasizing historical context and derivations, while others focused on intuitive explanations. The study highlights the potential for using honorifics to adjust the depth and complexity of AI-generated explanations in educational contexts. Furthermore, the responsiveness of AI models to cultural linguistic elements underscores the importance of considering cultural factors in AI development for educational applications. These results open new avenues for research in AI-assisted education and cultural adaptation in AI systems, with significant implications for personalizing learning experiences and developing culturally sensitive AI tools for global education.
Related papers
- Decoding AI and Human Authorship: Nuances Revealed Through NLP and Statistical Analysis [0.0]
This research explores the nuanced differences in texts produced by AI and those written by humans.
The study investigates various linguistic traits, patterns of creativity, and potential biases inherent in human-written and AI- generated texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T18:09:03Z) - OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI [73.75520820608232]
We introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities.
These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage.
Our evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T16:20:53Z) - Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models.
We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI.
While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z) - How Culture Shapes What People Want From AI [0.0]
There is an urgent need to incorporate the perspectives of culturally diverse groups into AI developments.
We present a novel conceptual framework for research that aims to expand, reimagine, and reground mainstream visions of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T07:08:19Z) - Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education [58.690250000579496]
We shed light on the intersectional studies of generative AI and adaptive learning.
We argue that this union will contribute significantly to the development of the next-stage learning format in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T23:54:51Z) - Multimodality of AI for Education: Towards Artificial General
Intelligence [14.121655991753483]
multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) approaches are paving the way towards the realization of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in educational contexts.
This research delves deeply into the key facets of AGI, including cognitive frameworks, advanced knowledge representation, adaptive learning mechanisms, and the integration of diverse multimodal data sources.
The paper also discusses the implications of multimodal AI's role in education, offering insights into future directions and challenges in AGI development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-10T23:32:55Z) - Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI.
While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision.
This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation.
We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z) - MAILS -- Meta AI Literacy Scale: Development and Testing of an AI
Literacy Questionnaire Based on Well-Founded Competency Models and
Psychological Change- and Meta-Competencies [6.368014180870025]
The questionnaire should be modular (i.e., including different facets that can be used independently of each other) to be flexibly applicable in professional life.
We derived 60 items to represent different facets of AI Literacy according to Ng and colleagues conceptualisation of AI literacy.
Additional 12 items to represent psychological competencies such as problem solving, learning, and emotion regulation in regard to AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-18T12:35:55Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal.
In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z) - A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented.
This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.