AuditNet: A Conversational AI-based Security Assistant [DEMO]

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14116v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 08:33:07 GMT
• Title: AuditNet: A Conversational AI-based Security Assistant [DEMO]
• Authors: Shohreh Deldari, Mohammad Goudarzi, Aditya Joshi, Arash Shaghaghi, Simon Finn, Flora D. Salim, Sanjay Jha,
• Abstract summary: We propose a versatile conversational AI assistant framework designed to facilitate compliance checking on the go. Our framework automates the review, indexing, and retrieval of relevant, context-aware information. This AI assistant not only reduces the manual effort involved in compliance checks but also enhances accuracy and efficiency.
• Score: 10.941722434218262
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In the age of information overload, professionals across various fields face the challenge of navigating vast amounts of documentation and ever-evolving standards. Ensuring compliance with standards, regulations, and contractual obligations is a critical yet complex task across various professional fields. We propose a versatile conversational AI assistant framework designed to facilitate compliance checking on the go, in diverse domains, including but not limited to network infrastructure, legal contracts, educational standards, environmental regulations, and government policies. By leveraging retrieval-augmented generation using large language models, our framework automates the review, indexing, and retrieval of relevant, context-aware information, streamlining the process of verifying adherence to established guidelines and requirements. This AI assistant not only reduces the manual effort involved in compliance checks but also enhances accuracy and efficiency, supporting professionals in maintaining high standards of practice and ensuring regulatory compliance in their respective fields. We propose and demonstrate AuditNet, the first conversational AI security assistant designed to assist IoT network security experts by providing instant access to security standards, policies, and regulations.

Related papers

• RegNLP in Action: Facilitating Compliance Through Automated Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  Regulatory documents, characterized by their length, complexity and frequent updates, are challenging to interpret. RegNLP is a multidisciplinary subfield aimed at simplifying access to and interpretation of regulatory rules and obligations. ObliQA dataset contains 27,869 questions derived from the Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation document collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• An Open Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements between the EU AI Act and International Standards [1.9142148274342772]
  The EU's AI Act will shift the focus of such organizations toward conformance with the technical requirements for regulatory compliance. This paper offers a simple and repeatable mechanism for mapping the terms and requirements relevant to normative statements in regulations and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:21:09Z)
• Operationalizing the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Recommendations for Practitioners, Researchers, and Policy Makers [20.16404495546234]
  Several regulatory frameworks have been introduced by different countries worldwide. Many of these frameworks emphasize the need for auditing and improving the trustworthiness of AI tools. Although these regulatory frameworks highlight the necessity of enforcement, practitioners often lack detailed guidance on implementing them. We provide easy-to-understand summaries of state-of-the-art literature and highlight various gaps that exist between regulatory guidelines and existing AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T17:28:07Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
  This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user. We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z)
• Governing Through the Cloud: The Intermediary Role of Compute Providers in AI Regulation [14.704747149179047]
  We argue that compute providers should have legal obligations and ethical responsibilities associated with AI development and deployment. Compute providers can play an essential role in a regulatory ecosystem via four key capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T13:08:16Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Legal Requirements Analysis [2.3349787245442966]
  We explore a variety of methods for analyzing legal requirements and exemplify them on representations. We describe possible alternatives for creating machine-analyzable representations from regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T09:31:57Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• A General Framework for Verification and Control of Dynamical Models via Certificate Synthesis [54.959571890098786]
  We provide a framework to encode system specifications and define corresponding certificates. We present an automated approach to formally synthesise controllers and certificates. Our approach contributes to the broad field of safe learning for control, exploiting the flexibility of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T09:37:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.