Automated Code-centric Software Vulnerability Assessment: How Far Are We? An Empirical Study in C/C++

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17053v2
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 03:02:12 GMT
• Title: Automated Code-centric Software Vulnerability Assessment: How Far Are We? An Empirical Study in C/C++
• Authors: Anh The Nguyen, Triet Huynh Minh Le, M. Ali Babar,
• Abstract summary: We conduct the first empirical study to investigate and compare the performance of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models for function-level SV assessment in C/C++. We show that ML has matching or even better performance compared to the multi-class DL models for function-level SV assessment with significantly less training time.
• Score: 0.716879432974126
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: The C and C++ languages hold significant importance in Software Engineering research because of their widespread use in practice. Numerous studies have utilized Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques to detect software vulnerabilities (SVs) in the source code written in these languages. However, the application of these techniques in function-level SV assessment has been largely unexplored. SV assessment is increasingly crucial as it provides detailed information on the exploitability, impacts, and severity of security defects, thereby aiding in their prioritization and remediation. Aims: We conduct the first empirical study to investigate and compare the performance of ML and DL models, many of which have been used for SV detection, for function-level SV assessment in C/C++. Method: Using 9,993 vulnerable C/C++ functions, we evaluated the performance of six multi-class ML models and five multi-class DL models for the SV assessment at the function level based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). We further explore multi-task learning, which can leverage common vulnerable code to predict all SV assessment outputs simultaneously in a single model, and compare the effectiveness and efficiency of this model type with those of the original multi-class models. Results: We show that ML has matching or even better performance compared to the multi-class DL models for function-level SV assessment with significantly less training time. Employing multi-task learning allows the DL models to perform significantly better, with an average of 8-22% increase in Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Conclusions: We distill the practices of using data-driven techniques for function-level SV assessment in C/C++, including the use of multi-task DL to balance efficiency and effectiveness. This can establish a strong foundation for future work in this area.

Related papers

• SCoPE: Evaluating LLMs for Software Vulnerability Detection [0.0]
  This work explores and refines the CVEFixes dataset, which is commonly used to train models for code-related tasks. The output generated by SCoPE was used to create a new version of CVEFixes. The results show that SCoPE successfully helped to identify 905 duplicates within the evaluated subset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T15:02:00Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• M2CVD: Enhancing Vulnerability Semantic through Multi-Model Collaboration for Code Vulnerability Detection [52.4455893010468]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong capabilities in code comprehension, but fine-tuning costs and semantic alignment issues limit their project-specific optimization. Code models such CodeBERT are easy to fine-tune, but it is often difficult to learn vulnerability semantics from complex code languages. This paper introduces the Multi-Model Collaborative Vulnerability Detection approach (M2CVD) to improve the detection accuracy of code models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T00:05:49Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• An Empirical Study of Automated Vulnerability Localization with Large Language Models [21.84971967029474]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in various domains, yet their effectiveness in vulnerability localization remains underexplored. Our investigation encompasses 10+ leading LLMs suitable for code analysis, including ChatGPT and various open-source models. We explore the efficacy of these LLMs using 4 distinct paradigms: zero-shot learning, one-shot learning, discriminative fine-tuning, and generative fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T08:42:10Z)
• Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks. However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs. We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z)
• CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab [12.981407327149679]
  This paper introduces CogBench, a benchmark that includes ten behavioral metrics derived from seven cognitive psychology experiments. We apply CogBench to 35 large language models (LLMs) and analyze this data using statistical multilevel modeling techniques. We find that open-source models are less risk-prone than proprietary models and that fine-tuning on code does not necessarily enhance LLMs' behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T10:43:54Z)
• Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study [71.84852429039881]
  Investigation focuses on the models' ability to handle a range of perturbations, such as sensor faults and noise. We test the generalization and transfer learning capabilities of these models by exposing them to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T12:43:59Z)
• Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlation [65.83104529677234]
  We study the learning process of a two-layer nonlinear convolutional neural network in the presence of spurious features. Our analysis suggests that imbalanced data groups and easily learnable spurious features can lead to the dominance of spurious features during the learning process. We propose a new training algorithm called PDE that efficiently enhances the model's robustness for a better worst-group performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T05:44:06Z)
• On the Use of Fine-grained Vulnerable Code Statements for Software Vulnerability Assessment Models [0.0]
  We use large-scale data from 1,782 functions of 429 SVs in 200 real-world projects to develop Machine Learning models for function-level SV assessment tasks. We show that vulnerable statements are 5.8 times smaller in size, yet exhibit 7.5-114.5% stronger assessment performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T06:29:40Z)
• DeepCVA: Automated Commit-level Vulnerability Assessment with Deep Multi-task Learning [0.0]
  We propose a novel Deep multi-task learning model, DeepCVA, to automate seven Commit-level Vulnerability Assessment tasks simultaneously. We conduct large-scale experiments on 1,229 vulnerability-contributing commits containing 542 different SVs in 246 real-world software projects. DeepCVA is the best-performing model with 38% to 59.8% higher Matthews Correlation Coefficient than many supervised and unsupervised baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-18T08:43:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.