Development of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Systems for Corporate Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17588v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 08:02:58 GMT
• Title: Development of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Systems for Corporate Management
• Authors: Anna Romanova,
• Abstract summary: The function of a corporate director is still one of the few that are legislated for execution by a "natural" rather than an "artificial" person. The main prerequisites for development of systems for full automation of management decisions made at the level of a board of directors are formed in the field of corporate law. There are two main options of management decisions automation at the level of top management and a board of directors: digital command centers or automation of separate functions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The article discusses development of autonomous artificial intelligence systems for corporate management. The function of a corporate director is still one of the few that are legislated for execution by a "natural" rather than an "artificial" person. The main prerequisites for development of systems for full automation of management decisions made at the level of a board of directors are formed in the field of corporate law, machine learning, and compliance with the rules of non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability of decisions made and algorithms applied. The basic methodological approaches in terms of corporate law for the "autonomous director" have already been developed and do not get rejection among representatives of the legal sciences. However, there is an undeniable need for further extensive research in order to amend corporate law to effectively introduce "autonomous directors". In practice, there are two main options of management decisions automation at the level of top management and a board of directors: digital command centers or automation of separate functions. Artificial intelligence systems will be subject to the same strict requirements for non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability as "natural" directors. At a certain stage, autonomous systems can be an effective tool for countries, regions, and companies with a shortage of human capital, equalizing or providing additional chances for such countries and companies to compete on the global market.

Related papers

• Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry [0.0]
  We discuss challenges that any organization attempting to operationalize AI governance will have to face. These include questions concerning how to define the material scope of AI governance. We hope to provide project managers, AI practitioners, and data privacy officers responsible for designing and implementing AI governance frameworks with general best practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T12:01:42Z)
• Elements Of Legislation For Artificial Intelligence Systems [0.0]
  A dedicated operational context for autonomous artificial intelligence systems is created. The wording of local regulatory documents can be presented in two versions: for use by people and for use by autonomous systems. Local regulations that provide basis for the joint work of individuals and autonomous artificial intelligence systems can form the grounds for the relevant legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T11:01:31Z)
• Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We discuss the connection between the emerging management-based regulatory frameworks governing AI and the need for human oversight during training. We argue that the kinds of high-stakes use cases for AI that appear of most concern to regulators should lean more on human-guided training than on data-only training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T13:48:54Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Conformal Decision Theory: Safe Autonomous Decisions from Imperfect Predictions [80.34972679938483]
  We introduce Conformal Decision Theory, a framework for producing safe autonomous decisions despite imperfect machine learning predictions. Decisions produced by our algorithms are safe in the sense that they come with provable statistical guarantees of having low risk. Experiments demonstrate the utility of our approach in robot motion planning around humans, automated stock trading, and robot manufacturing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:59:30Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Governance, Risk and Compliance: Results of a study on potentials for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in governance, risk and compliance (GRC) [0.0]
  GRC (Governance, Risk and Compliance) means an integrated governance-approach. Governance functions are interlinked and not separated from each other. Artificial intelligence is being used in GRC for processing and analysis of unstructured data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T12:36:10Z)
• Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance [0.0]
  We present an AI governance framework, which targets organizations that develop and use AI systems. The framework is designed to help organizations deploying AI systems translate ethical AI principles into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T08:55:27Z)
• Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local Economic Transactions [80.49176924360499]
  We establish a framework for directing a society of simple, specialized, self-interested agents to solve sequential decision problems. We derive a class of decentralized reinforcement learning algorithms. We demonstrate the potential advantages of a society's inherent modular structure for more efficient transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T16:41:09Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
• Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
  It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules. This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.