Tackling the Problem of Distributional Shifts: Correcting Misspecified, High-Dimensional Data-Driven Priors for Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17667v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:39:27 GMT
• Title: Tackling the Problem of Distributional Shifts: Correcting Misspecified, High-Dimensional Data-Driven Priors for Inverse Problems
• Authors: Gabriel Missael Barco, Alexandre Adam, Connor Stone, Yashar Hezaveh, Laurence Perreault-Levasseur,
• Abstract summary: Data-driven population-level distributions are emerging as an appealing alternative to simple parametric priors in inverse problems. It is difficult to acquire independent and identically distributed samples from the underlying data-generating process of interest to train these models. We show that starting from a misspecified prior distribution, the updated distribution becomes progressively closer to the underlying population-level distribution.
• Score: 39.58317527488534
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian inference for inverse problems hinges critically on the choice of priors. In the absence of specific prior information, population-level distributions can serve as effective priors for parameters of interest. With the advent of machine learning, the use of data-driven population-level distributions (encoded, e.g., in a trained deep neural network) as priors is emerging as an appealing alternative to simple parametric priors in a variety of inverse problems. However, in many astrophysical applications, it is often difficult or even impossible to acquire independent and identically distributed samples from the underlying data-generating process of interest to train these models. In these cases, corrupted data or a surrogate, e.g. a simulator, is often used to produce training samples, meaning that there is a risk of obtaining misspecified priors. This, in turn, can bias the inferred posteriors in ways that are difficult to quantify, which limits the potential applicability of these models in real-world scenarios. In this work, we propose addressing this issue by iteratively updating the population-level distributions by retraining the model with posterior samples from different sets of observations and showcase the potential of this method on the problem of background image reconstruction in strong gravitational lensing when score-based models are used as data-driven priors. We show that starting from a misspecified prior distribution, the updated distribution becomes progressively closer to the underlying population-level distribution, and the resulting posterior samples exhibit reduced bias after several updates.

Related papers

• Amortizing intractable inference in diffusion models for vision, language, and control [89.65631572949702]
  This paper studies amortized sampling of the posterior over data, $mathbfxsim prm post(mathbfx)propto p(mathbfx)r(mathbfx)$, in a model that consists of a diffusion generative model prior $p(mathbfx)$ and a black-box constraint or function $r(mathbfx)$. We prove the correctness of a data-free learning objective, relative trajectory balance, for training a diffusion model that samples from
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T16:18:46Z)
• Reducing the cost of posterior sampling in linear inverse problems via task-dependent score learning [5.340736751238338]
  We show that the evaluation of the forward mapping can be entirely bypassed during posterior sample generation. We prove that this observation generalizes to the framework of infinite-dimensional diffusion models introduced recently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T15:33:27Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• Out of the Ordinary: Spectrally Adapting Regression for Covariate Shift [12.770658031721435]
  We propose a method for adapting the weights of the last layer of a pre-trained neural regression model to perform better on input data originating from a different distribution. We demonstrate how this lightweight spectral adaptation procedure can improve out-of-distribution performance for synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T04:15:58Z)
• Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correction [0.4588028371034407]
  A neural network is trained to approximate the posterior distribution over existing pairs of model and data. The accuracy of this approach relies on the availability of high-fidelity training data. We show that our correction step improves the robustness of amortized variational inference with respect to changes in number of source experiments, noise variance, and shifts in the prior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T02:38:54Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Deep Visual Anomaly detection with Negative Learning [18.79849041106952]
  In this paper, we propose anomaly detection with negative learning (ADNL), which employs the negative learning concept for the enhancement of anomaly detection. The idea is to limit the reconstruction capability of a generative model using the given a small amount of anomaly examples. This way, the network not only learns to reconstruct normal data but also encloses the normal distribution far from the possible distribution of anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T01:48:44Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Meta-Learning Conjugate Priors for Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
  We propose a novel approach to utilize meta-learning to automate the estimation of informative conjugate prior distributions. From this process we generate priors that require only few data to estimate the shape parameters of the original distribution of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-03T23:58:32Z)
• Improving Maximum Likelihood Training for Text Generation with Density Ratio Estimation [51.091890311312085]
  We propose a new training scheme for auto-regressive sequence generative models, which is effective and stable when operating at large sample space encountered in text generation. Our method stably outperforms Maximum Likelihood Estimation and other state-of-the-art sequence generative models in terms of both quality and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-12T15:31:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.