Towards Generalized Offensive Language Identification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18738v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:50:22 GMT
• Title: Towards Generalized Offensive Language Identification
• Authors: Alphaeus Dmonte, Tejas Arya, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri,
• Abstract summary: This paper empirically evaluates the generalizability of offensive language detection models and datasets across a novel generalized benchmark. Our findings will be useful in creating robust real-world offensive language detection systems.
• Score: 13.261770797304777
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The prevalence of offensive content on the internet, encompassing hate speech and cyberbullying, is a pervasive issue worldwide. Consequently, it has garnered significant attention from the machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) communities. As a result, numerous systems have been developed to automatically identify potentially harmful content and mitigate its impact. These systems can follow two approaches; (1) Use publicly available models and application endpoints, including prompting large language models (LLMs) (2) Annotate datasets and train ML models on them. However, both approaches lack an understanding of how generalizable they are. Furthermore, the applicability of these systems is often questioned in off-domain and practical environments. This paper empirically evaluates the generalizability of offensive language detection models and datasets across a novel generalized benchmark. We answer three research questions on generalizability. Our findings will be useful in creating robust real-world offensive language detection systems.

Related papers

• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• Fine-Tuning Llama 2 Large Language Models for Detecting Online Sexual Predatory Chats and Abusive Texts [2.406214748890827]
  This paper proposes an approach to detection of online sexual predatory chats and abusive language using the open-source pretrained Llama 2 7B- parameter model. We fine-tune the LLM using datasets with different sizes, imbalance degrees, and languages (i.e., English, Roman Urdu and Urdu) Experimental results show a strong performance of the proposed approach, which performs proficiently and consistently across three distinct datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T16:18:50Z)
• Evaluating and Modeling Attribution for Cross-Lingual Question Answering [80.4807682093432]
  This work is the first to study attribution for cross-lingual question answering. We collect data in 5 languages to assess the attribution level of a state-of-the-art cross-lingual QA system. We find that a substantial portion of the answers is not attributable to any retrieved passages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:57:46Z)
• Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey [5.663056267168211]
  We discuss over 250 recent studies of English language model behavior before task-specific fine-tuning. Despite dramatic increases in generated text quality as models scale to hundreds of billions of parameters, the models are still prone to unfactual responses, commonsense errors, memorized text, and social biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T23:54:26Z)
• Generalizing in the Real World with Representation Learning [1.3494312389622642]
  Machine learning (ML) formalizes the problem of getting computers to learn from experience as optimization of performance according to some metric(s) This is in contrast to requiring behaviour specified in advance (e.g. by hard-coded rules) In this thesis I cover some of my work towards better understanding deep net generalization, identify several ways assumptions and problem settings fail to generalize to the real world, and propose ways to address those failures in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T15:11:09Z)
• A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformers [66.9176610388952]
  We present the fundamentals behind the next version of the Perspective API from Google Jigsaw. At the heart of the approach is a single multilingual token-free Charformer model. We demonstrate that by forgoing static vocabularies, we gain flexibility across a variety of settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T20:55:31Z)
• Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making [72.77825666035203]
  We describe a framework for imitation learning in which goals and observations are represented as a sequence of embeddings. We demonstrate that this framework enables effective generalization across different environments. For test tasks involving novel goals or novel scenes, initializing policies with language models improves task completion rates by 43.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T18:55:52Z)
• Improving Classifier Training Efficiency for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection with Feature Density [58.64907136562178]
  We study the effectiveness of Feature Density (FD) using different linguistically-backed feature preprocessing methods. We hypothesise that estimating dataset complexity allows for the reduction of the number of required experiments. The difference in linguistic complexity of datasets allows us to additionally discuss the efficacy of linguistically-backed word preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:48:28Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.