OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19056v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:27:17 GMT
• Title: OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automation
• Authors: Zilong Wang, Yuedong Cui, Li Zhong, Zimin Zhang, Da Yin, Bill Yuchen Lin, Jingbo Shang,
• Abstract summary: Office automation significantly enhances human productivity by automatically finishing routine tasks in the workflow. We introduce OfficeBench, one of the first office automation benchmarks for evaluating current LLM agents' capability to address office tasks in realistic office. Applying our customized evaluation methods on each task, we find that GPT-4 Omni achieves the highest pass rate of 47.00%, demonstrating a decent performance in handling office tasks.
• Score: 51.27062359412488
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Office automation significantly enhances human productivity by automatically finishing routine tasks in the workflow. Beyond the basic information extraction studied in much of the prior document AI literature, the office automation research should be extended to more realistic office tasks which require to integrate various information sources in the office system and produce outputs through a series of decision-making processes. We introduce OfficeBench, one of the first office automation benchmarks for evaluating current LLM agents' capability to address office tasks in realistic office workflows. OfficeBench requires LLM agents to perform feasible long-horizon planning, proficiently switch between applications in a timely manner, and accurately ground their actions within a large combined action space, based on the contextual demands of the workflow. Applying our customized evaluation methods on each task, we find that GPT-4 Omni achieves the highest pass rate of 47.00%, demonstrating a decent performance in handling office tasks. However, this is still far below the human performance and accuracy standards required by real-world office workflows. We further observe that most issues are related to operation redundancy and hallucinations, as well as limitations in switching between multiple applications, which may provide valuable insights for developing effective agent frameworks for office automation.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorFBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures. We also present WorFEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms. We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)
• Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows? [73.81908518992161]
  We introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering. Spider2-V features real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:54:37Z)
• Assessing and Verifying Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications [28.41607905656699]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to a surge in applications that facilitate collaboration among agents, assisting humans in their daily tasks. This highlights the need to verify utility of LLM-powered applications, particularly by ensuring alignment between the application's functionality and end-user needs. We introduce AgentEval, a novel framework designed to simplify the utility verification process by automatically proposing a set of criteria tailored to the unique purpose of any given application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T15:26:27Z)
• WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
  We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers. WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform. BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z)
• Towards better Human-Agent Alignment: Assessing Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications [37.047117782796064]
  AgentEval is a framework designed to simplify the utility verification process. We present a comprehensive analysis of the robustness of quantifier's work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T08:46:15Z)
• The Foundations of Computational Management: A Systematic Approach to Task Automation for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Existing Workflows [55.2480439325792]
  This article introduces Computational Management, a systematic approach to task automation. The article offers three easy step-by-step procedures to begin the process of implementing AI within a workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T01:45:14Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.