Using Large Language Models for the Interpretation of Building Regulations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21060v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:30:47 GMT
• Title: Using Large Language Models for the Interpretation of Building Regulations
• Authors: Stefan Fuchs, Michael Witbrock, Johannes Dimyadi, Robert Amor,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can generate logically coherent text and source code responding to user prompts. This paper evaluates the performance of LLMs in translating building regulations into LegalRuleML in a few-shot learning setup.
• Score: 7.013802453969655
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Compliance checking is an essential part of a construction project. The recent rapid uptake of building information models (BIM) in the construction industry has created more opportunities for automated compliance checking (ACC). BIM enables sharing of digital building design data that can be used for compliance checking with legal requirements, which are conventionally conveyed in natural language and not intended for machine processing. Creating a computable representation of legal requirements suitable for ACC is complex, costly, and time-consuming. Large language models (LLMs) such as the generative pre-trained transformers (GPT), GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, powering OpenAI's ChatGPT, can generate logically coherent text and source code responding to user prompts. This capability could be used to automate the conversion of building regulations into a semantic and computable representation. This paper evaluates the performance of LLMs in translating building regulations into LegalRuleML in a few-shot learning setup. By providing GPT-3.5 with only a few example translations, it can learn the basic structure of the format. Using a system prompt, we further specify the LegalRuleML representation and explore the existence of expert domain knowledge in the model. Such domain knowledge might be ingrained in GPT-3.5 through the broad pre-training but needs to be brought forth by careful contextualisation. Finally, we investigate whether strategies such as chain-of-thought reasoning and self-consistency could apply to this use case. As LLMs become more sophisticated, the increased common sense, logical coherence, and means to domain adaptation can significantly support ACC, leading to more efficient and effective checking processes.

Related papers

• KRAG Framework for Enhancing LLMs in the Legal Domain [0.48451657575793666]
  This paper introduces Knowledge Representation Augmented Generation (KRAG) KRAG is a framework designed to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) within domain-specific applications. We present Soft PROLEG, an implementation model under KRAG, which uses inference graphs to aid LLMs in delivering structured legal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T02:48:06Z)
• Verbalized Machine Learning: Revisiting Machine Learning with Language Models [63.10391314749408]
  We introduce the framework of verbalized machine learning (VML) VML constrains the parameter space to be human-interpretable natural language. We empirically verify the effectiveness of VML, and hope that VML can serve as a stepping stone to stronger interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:59:56Z)
• kNN-ICL: Compositional Task-Oriented Parsing Generalization with Nearest Neighbor In-Context Learning [50.40636157214161]
  Task-Oriented Parsing (TOP) enables conversational assistants to interpret user commands expressed in natural language. LLMs have achieved impressive performance in computer programs based on a natural language prompt. This paper focuses on harnessing the capabilities of LLMs for semantic parsing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T17:26:50Z)
• From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems [0.6249768559720122]
  Rule-based expert systems focused on legislation can support laypeople in understanding how legislation applies to them and provide them with helpful context and information. Here, we investigate what degree large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, are able to automatically extract structured representations from legislation. We use LLMs to create pathways from legislation, according to the JusticeBot methodology for legal decision support systems, evaluate the pathways and compare them to manually created pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T18:31:02Z)
• Do Language Models Learn about Legal Entity Types during Pretraining? [4.604003661048267]
  We show that Llama2 performs well on certain entities and exhibits potential for substantial improvement with optimized prompt templates. Llama2 appears to frequently overlook syntactic cues, a shortcoming less present in BERT-based architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T18:47:21Z)
• Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions? [54.86632921036983]
  Large language models (LLMs) can understand human instructions, but struggle with complex instructions. Existing benchmarks are insufficient to assess LLMs' ability to understand complex instructions. We propose CELLO, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to follow complex instructions systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T04:18:39Z)
• LLM-FuncMapper: Function Identification for Interpreting Complex Clauses in Building Codes via LLM [3.802984168589694]
  LLM-FuncMapper is an approach to identifying predefined functions needed to interpret various regulatory clauses. Almost 100% of computer-processible clauses can be interpreted and represented as computer-executable codes. This study is the first attempt to introduce LLM for understanding and interpreting complex regulatory clauses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T01:58:04Z)
• Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models [75.75038268227554]
  Self-Checker is a framework comprising a set of plug-and-play modules that facilitate fact-checking. This framework provides a fast and efficient way to construct fact-checking systems in low-resource environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T01:46:07Z)
• Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structures [51.68385617116854]
  Transformer-based language models are effective but complex, and understanding their inner workings is a significant challenge. We introduce a family of synthetic CFGs that produce hierarchical rules, capable of generating lengthy sentences. We demonstrate that generative models like GPT can accurately learn this CFG language and generate sentences based on it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:28:16Z)
• nl2spec: Interactively Translating Unstructured Natural Language to Temporal Logics with Large Language Models [3.1143846686797314]
  We present nl2spec, a framework for applying Large Language Models (LLMs) derive formal specifications from unstructured natural language. We introduce a new methodology to detect and resolve the inherent ambiguity of system requirements in natural language. Users iteratively add, delete, and edit these sub-translations to amend erroneous formalizations, which is easier than manually redrafting the entire formalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T20:08:53Z)
• Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making [72.77825666035203]
  We describe a framework for imitation learning in which goals and observations are represented as a sequence of embeddings. We demonstrate that this framework enables effective generalization across different environments. For test tasks involving novel goals or novel scenes, initializing policies with language models improves task completion rates by 43.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T18:55:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.