ARCEAK: An Automated Rule Checking Framework Enhanced with Architectural Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14735v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 10:37:11 GMT
• Title: ARCEAK: An Automated Rule Checking Framework Enhanced with Architectural Knowledge
• Authors: Junyong Chen, Ling-I Wu, Minyu Chen, Xiaoying Qian, Haoze Zhu, Qiongfang Zhang, Guoqiang Li,
• Abstract summary: Automated Rule Checking (ARC) plays a crucial role in advancing the construction industry by addressing the laborious, inconsistent, and error-prone nature of traditional model review conducted by industry professionals.<n>Our study introduces a novel approach that decomposes ARC into two distinct tasks: rule information extraction and verification code generation.
• Score: 2.0159170788984024
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated Rule Checking (ARC) plays a crucial role in advancing the construction industry by addressing the laborious, inconsistent, and error-prone nature of traditional model review conducted by industry professionals. Manual assessment against intricate sets of rules often leads to significant project delays and expenses. In response to these challenges, ARC offers a promising solution to improve efficiency and compliance in design within the construction sector. However, the main challenge of ARC lies in translating regulatory text into a format suitable for computer processing. Current methods for rule interpretation require extensive manual labor, thereby limiting their practicality. To address this issue, our study introduces a novel approach that decomposes ARC into two distinct tasks: rule information extraction and verification code generation. Leveraging generative pre-trained transformers, our method aims to streamline the interpretation of regulatory texts and simplify the process of generating model compliance checking code. Through empirical evaluation and case studies, we showcase the effectiveness and potential of our approach in automating code compliance checking, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of construction projects.

Related papers

• AlignRAG: An Adaptable Framework for Resolving Misalignments in Retrieval-Aware Reasoning of RAG [61.28113271728859]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a foundational paradigm for knowledge-grounded text generation. Existing RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that the reasoning trajectories align with the evidential constraints imposed by retrieved content. We propose AlignRAG, a novel test-time framework that mitigates reasoning misalignment through iterative Critique-Driven Alignment steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Representing Normative Regulations in OWL DL for Automated Compliance Checking Supported by Text Annotation [0.138120109831448]
  We propose an annotation schema and an algorithm that transforms text annotations into machine-interpretable OWL DL code. The proposed approach is validated through a proof-of-concept implementation applied to examples from the building construction domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T12:05:21Z)
• A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences [76.73731245899454]
  We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience.<n>Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision.<n>This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the Intelligent Court''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T10:26:54Z)
• ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verification [53.80183105328448]
  Refine via Intrinsic Self-Verification (ReVISE) is an efficient framework that enables LLMs to self-correct their outputs through self-verification.<n>Our experiments on various reasoning tasks demonstrate that ReVISE achieves efficient self-correction and significantly improves reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T13:50:02Z)
• Learning Task Representations from In-Context Learning [73.72066284711462]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in in-context learning.<n>We introduce an automated formulation for encoding task information in ICL prompts as a function of attention heads.<n>We show that our method's effectiveness stems from aligning the distribution of the last hidden state with that of an optimally performing in-context-learned model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T00:16:44Z)
• Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel system designed to verify code implementations against the algorithms and methodologies outlined in corresponding research papers.<n>Our system employs Retrieval-Augmented Generation to extract relevant details from both the research papers and code bases, followed by a structured comparison using Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T00:35:42Z)
• A Comprehensive Framework for Reliable Legal AI: Combining Specialized Expert Systems and Adaptive Refinement [0.0]
  Article proposes a novel framework combining expert systems with a knowledge-based architecture to improve the precision and contextual relevance of AI-driven legal services.<n>This framework utilizes specialized modules, each focusing on specific legal areas, and incorporates structured operational guidelines to enhance decision-making.<n>The proposed approach demonstrates significant improvements over existing AI models, showcasing enhanced performance in legal tasks and offering a scalable solution to provide more accessible and affordable legal services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T14:00:11Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks [68.49251303172674]
  State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive problem-solving capabilities but may struggle with complex reasoning and factual correctness. Existing methods harness the strengths of chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to decompose a complex problem into simpler steps and apply retrieval to improve factual correctness. We introduce Critic-guided planning with Retrieval-augmentation, CR-Planner, a novel framework that leverages fine-tuned critic models to guide both reasoning and retrieval processes through planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T11:26:02Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning for Automated Process Engineering Calculations : A Tool-Chaining Problem-Solving Framework with Attributable Reflection [0.0]
  We introduce a novel autonomous agent framework leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Instruction-Tuning (RAIT) to enhance open, customizable small code language models (SLMs) By combining instruction tuned code SLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation (RACG) using external tools, the agent generates, debugs, and optimize code from natural language specifications. Our approach addresses the limitations of the current lack of a foundational AI model for specialized process engineering tasks and offers benefits of explainability, knowledge editing, and cost-effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T15:33:47Z)
• Using Large Language Models for the Interpretation of Building Regulations [7.013802453969655]
  Large language models (LLMs) can generate logically coherent text and source code responding to user prompts. This paper evaluates the performance of LLMs in translating building regulations into LegalRuleML in a few-shot learning setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T08:30:47Z)
• CoCoST: Automatic Complex Code Generation with Online Searching and Correctness Testing [51.00909683314142]
  Large Language Models have revolutionized code generation ability by converting natural language descriptions into executable code. CoCoST framework enhances complex code generation by online searching for more information with planned queries and correctness testing for code refinement. CoCoST is validated through rigorous experiments on the DS-1000 and ClassEval datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T13:33:55Z)
• Enhancing Court View Generation with Knowledge Injection and Guidance [43.32071790286732]
  Court View Generation (CVG) aims to generate court views based on the plaintiff claims and the fact descriptions. PLMs have showcased their prowess in natural language generation, but their application to the complex, knowledge-intensive domain of CVG often reveals inherent limitations. We present a novel approach, named Knowledge Injection and Guidance (KIG), designed to bolster CVG using PLMs. To efficiently incorporate domain knowledge during the training stage, we introduce a knowledge-injected prompt encoder for prompt tuning, thereby reducing computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T09:51:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.