Ontology of Belief Diversity: A Community-Based Epistemological Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01455v1
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:02:50 GMT
- Title: Ontology of Belief Diversity: A Community-Based Epistemological Approach
- Authors: Tyler Fischella, Erin van Liemt, Qiuyi, Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We focus on developing a pragmatic ontology of belief systems, which is a complex and often controversial space.
By iterating on our community-based design until mutual agreement is reached, we found that methods were best for categorizing the fundamental ways beliefs differ.
- Score: 44.99833362998488
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: AI applications across classification, fairness, and human interaction often implicitly require ontologies of social concepts. Constructing these well, especially when there are many relevant categories, is a controversial task but is crucial for achieving meaningful inclusivity. Here, we focus on developing a pragmatic ontology of belief systems, which is a complex and often controversial space. By iterating on our community-based design until mutual agreement is reached, we found that epistemological methods were best for categorizing the fundamental ways beliefs differ, maximally respecting our principles of inclusivity and brevity. We demonstrate our methodology's utility and interpretability via user studies in term annotation and sentiment analysis experiments for belief fairness in language models.
Related papers
- ApplE: An Applied Ethics Ontology with Event Context [0.8056359341994941]
We propose ApplE, an Applied Ethics ontology that captures philosophical theory and event context to holistically describe the morality of an action.
The development process adheres to a modified version of the Agile methodology for Ontology Development (SAMOD) and utilizes standard design and publication practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T17:34:50Z) - A Metasemantic-Metapragmatic Framework for Taxonomizing Multimodal Communicative Alignment [0.0]
This paper presents a metasemantic-metapragmatic taxonomy for grounding and conceptualizing human-like multimodal communicative alignment.
I introduce the concept of indexical contextualization and propose the principle of "contextualization directionality"
The framework's broader implications for intentionality, identity, affect, and ethics in within-modal and cross-modal human-machine alignment are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T21:00:19Z) - A Note on an Inferentialist Approach to Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
'Inferentialism' is the view that meaning is given in terms of inferential behaviour.
This paper shows how 'inferentialism' enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T14:13:21Z) - Regularized Conventions: Equilibrium Computation as a Model of Pragmatic
Reasoning [72.21876989058858]
We present a model of pragmatic language understanding, where utterances are produced and understood by searching for regularized equilibria of signaling games.
In this model speakers and listeners search for contextually appropriate utterance--meaning mappings that are both close to game-theoretically optimal conventions and close to a shared, ''default'' semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T09:42:36Z) - A Unifying Framework for Learning Argumentation Semantics [50.69905074548764]
We present a novel framework, which uses an Inductive Logic Programming approach to learn the acceptability semantics for several abstract and structured argumentation frameworks in an interpretable way.
Our framework outperforms existing argumentation solvers, thus opening up new future research directions in the area of formal argumentation and human-machine dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T20:18:05Z) - Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination
of Intersectionality in AI Fairness [55.037030060643126]
Intersectionality is a critical framework that allows us to examine how social inequalities persist.
We argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-16T21:02:09Z) - Semantic Search for Large Scale Clinical Ontologies [63.71950996116403]
We present a deep learning approach to build a search system for large clinical vocabularies.
We propose a Triplet-BERT model and a method that generates training data based on semantic training data.
The model is evaluated using five real benchmark data sets and the results show that our approach achieves high results on both free text to concept and concept to searching concept vocabularies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-01T05:15:42Z) - The General Theory of General Intelligence: A Pragmatic Patternist
Perspective [0.0]
Review covers underlying philosophies, formalizations of the concept of intelligence, and a proposed high level architecture for AGI systems.
The specifics of human-like cognitive architecture are presented as manifestations of these general principles.
Lessons for practical implementation of advanced AGI in frameworks such as OpenCog Hyperon are briefly considered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-28T10:11:25Z) - A model of interaction semantics [0.0]
I structure the model of interaction semantics similar to the semantics of a formal language.
I arrive at a model of interaction semantics which, in the sense of the late Ludwig Wittgenstein, can do without a'mental' mapping from characters to concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-13T09:22:59Z) - On the Merging of Domain-Specific Heterogeneous Ontologies using Wordnet
and Web Pattern-based Queries [0.0]
We aim at providing a formal, explicit and shared conceptualization and understanding of common domains between different communities.
Ontologies allow for concepts and their constraints of a specific domain to be explicitly defined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T05:03:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.