MAO: A Framework for Process Model Generation with Multi-Agent Orchestration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01916v2
• Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:37:38 GMT
• Title: MAO: A Framework for Process Model Generation with Multi-Agent Orchestration
• Authors: Leilei Lin, Yumeng Jin, Yingming Zhou, Wenlong Chen, Chen Qian,
• Abstract summary: This article explores a framework for automatically generating process models with multi-agent orchestration (MAO) Large language models are prone to hallucinations, so the agents need to review and repair semantic hallucinations in process models. Experiments demonstrate that the process models generated by our framework surpass manual modeling by 89%, 61%, 52%, and 75% on four different datasets.
• Score: 12.729855942941724
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Process models are frequently used in software engineering to describe business requirements, guide software testing and control system improvement. However, traditional process modeling methods often require the participation of numerous experts, which is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, the exploration of a more efficient and cost-effective automated modeling method has emerged as a focal point in current research. This article explores a framework for automatically generating process models with multi-agent orchestration (MAO), aiming to enhance the efficiency of process modeling and offer valuable insights for domain experts. Our framework MAO leverages large language models as the cornerstone for multi-agent, employing an innovative prompt strategy to ensure efficient collaboration among multi-agent. Specifically, 1) generation. The first phase of MAO is to generate a slightly rough process model from the text description; 2) refinement. The agents would continuously refine the initial process model through multiple rounds of dialogue; 3) reviewing. Large language models are prone to hallucination phenomena among multi-turn dialogues, so the agents need to review and repair semantic hallucinations in process models; 4) testing. The representation of process models is diverse. Consequently, the agents utilize external tools to test whether the generated process model contains format errors, namely format hallucinations, and then adjust the process model to conform to the output paradigm. The experiments demonstrate that the process models generated by our framework outperform existing methods and surpass manual modeling by 89%, 61%, 52%, and 75% on four different datasets, respectively.

Related papers

• Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization [65.64108848398696]
  We introduce a preference optimization process to enhance the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We develop a simple yet effective method, termed Mixed Preference Optimization (MPO), which boosts multimodal CoT performance. Our model, InternVL2-8B-MPO, achieves an accuracy of 67.0 on MathVista, outperforming InternVL2-8B by 8.7 points and achieving performance comparable to the 10x larger InternVL2-76B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T18:59:27Z)
• Efficient Multi-Task Large Model Training via Data Heterogeneity-aware Model Management [35.06717005729781]
  Recent foundation models are capable of handling multiple machine learning (ML) tasks and multiple data modalities with the unified base model structure and several specialized model components. Development of such multi-task (MT) multi-modal (MM) models poses significant model management challenges to existing training systems. We build a prototype system and evaluate it on various large MT MM models. Experiments demonstrate the superior performance and efficiency of our system, with speedup ratio up to 71% compared to state-of-the-art training systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:10:40Z)
• Towards Synthetic Trace Generation of Modeling Operations using In-Context Learning Approach [1.8874331450711404]
  We propose a conceptual framework that combines modeling event logs, intelligent modeling assistants, and the generation of modeling operations. In particular, the architecture comprises modeling components that help the designer specify the system, record its operation within a graphical modeling environment, and automatically recommend relevant operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T13:26:44Z)
• Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities [89.40778301238642]
  Model merging is an efficient empowerment technique in the machine learning community. There is a significant gap in the literature regarding a systematic and thorough review of these techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:58:48Z)
• A Survey on Model MoErging: Recycling and Routing Among Specialized Experts for Collaborative Learning [136.89318317245855]
  MoErging aims to recycle expert models to create an aggregate system with improved performance or generalization. A key component of MoErging methods is the creation of a router that decides which expert model(s) to use for a particular input or application. This survey includes a novel taxonomy for cataloging key design choices and clarifying suitable applications for each method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T17:49:00Z)
• EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging [55.03509900949149]
  We show that Elect, Mask & Rescale-Merging (EMR-Merging) shows outstanding performance compared to existing merging methods. EMR-Merging is tuning-free, thus requiring no data availability or any additional training while showing impressive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:25:45Z)
• Process Modeling With Large Language Models [42.0652924091318]
  This paper explores the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into process modeling. We propose a framework that leverages LLMs for the automated generation and iterative refinement of process models. Preliminary results demonstrate the framework's ability to streamline process modeling tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T11:27:47Z)
• ProMoAI: Process Modeling with Generative AI [42.0652924091318]
  ProMoAI is a novel tool that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically generate process models from textual descriptions. The tool also incorporates advanced prompt engineering, error handling, and code generation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T08:48:04Z)
• Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
  LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving. We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time. Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z)
• Model ensemble instead of prompt fusion: a sample-specific knowledge transfer method for few-shot prompt tuning [85.55727213502402]
  We focus on improving the few-shot performance of prompt tuning by transferring knowledge from soft prompts of source tasks. We propose Sample-specific Ensemble of Source Models (SESoM) SESoM learns to adjust the contribution of each source model for each target sample separately when ensembling source model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T01:33:16Z)
• MultiViz: An Analysis Benchmark for Visualizing and Understanding Multimodal Models [103.9987158554515]
  MultiViz is a method for analyzing the behavior of multimodal models by scaffolding the problem of interpretability into 4 stages. We show that the complementary stages in MultiViz together enable users to simulate model predictions, assign interpretable concepts to features, perform error analysis on model misclassifications, and use insights from error analysis to debug models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:42:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.