Conversational Prompt Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04560v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:18:39 GMT
• Title: Conversational Prompt Engineering
• Authors: Liat Ein-Dor, Orith Toledo-Ronen, Artem Spector, Shai Gretz, Lena Dankin, Alon Halfon, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim,
• Abstract summary: We propose Conversational Prompt Engineering (CPE), a user-friendly tool that helps users create personalized prompts for their specific tasks. CPE uses a chat model to briefly interact with users, helping them articulate their output preferences and integrating these into the prompt. A user study on summarization tasks demonstrates the value of CPE in creating personalized, high-performing prompts.
• Score: 14.614531952444013
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Prompts are how humans communicate with LLMs. Informative prompts are essential for guiding LLMs to produce the desired output. However, prompt engineering is often tedious and time-consuming, requiring significant expertise, limiting its widespread use. We propose Conversational Prompt Engineering (CPE), a user-friendly tool that helps users create personalized prompts for their specific tasks. CPE uses a chat model to briefly interact with users, helping them articulate their output preferences and integrating these into the prompt. The process includes two main stages: first, the model uses user-provided unlabeled data to generate data-driven questions and utilize user responses to shape the initial instruction. Then, the model shares the outputs generated by the instruction and uses user feedback to further refine the instruction and the outputs. The final result is a few-shot prompt, where the outputs approved by the user serve as few-shot examples. A user study on summarization tasks demonstrates the value of CPE in creating personalized, high-performing prompts. The results suggest that the zero-shot prompt obtained is comparable to its - much longer - few-shot counterpart, indicating significant savings in scenarios involving repetitive tasks with large text volumes.

Related papers

• Improving Ontology Requirements Engineering with OntoChat and Participatory Prompting [3.3241053483599563]
  ORE has primarily relied on manual methods, such as interviews and collaborative forums, to gather user requirements from domain experts. Current OntoChat offers a framework for ORE that utilise large language models (LLMs) to streamline the process. This study produces pre-defined prompt templates based on user queries, focusing on creating and refining personas, goals, scenarios, sample data, and data resources for user stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T19:21:14Z)
• Efficient Prompting Methods for Large Language Models: A Survey [50.171011917404485]
  Prompting has become a mainstream paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific natural language processing tasks. This approach brings the additional computational burden of model inference and human effort to guide and control the behavior of LLMs. We present the basic concepts of prompting, review the advances for efficient prompting, and highlight future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T12:19:08Z)
• Exploring Prompt Engineering Practices in the Enterprise [3.7882262667445734]
  A prompt is a natural language instruction designed to elicit certain behaviour or output from a model. For complex tasks and tasks with specific requirements, prompt design is not trivial. We analyze sessions of prompt editing behavior, categorizing the parts of prompts users iterated on and the types of changes they made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T20:32:32Z)
• Integrating Summarization and Retrieval for Enhanced Personalization via Large Language Models [11.950478880423733]
  Personalization is an essential factor in user experience with natural language processing (NLP) systems. With the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), a key question is how to leverage these models to better personalize user experiences. We propose a novel summary-augmented personalization with task-aware user summaries generated by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T23:40:41Z)
• Eliciting Human Preferences with Language Models [56.68637202313052]
  Language models (LMs) can be directed to perform target tasks by using labeled examples or natural language prompts. We propose to use *LMs themselves* to guide the task specification process. We study GATE in three domains: email validation, content recommendation, and moral reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T21:11:21Z)
• TEMPERA: Test-Time Prompting via Reinforcement Learning [57.48657629588436]
  We propose Test-time Prompt Editing using Reinforcement learning (TEMPERA) In contrast to prior prompt generation methods, TEMPERA can efficiently leverage prior knowledge. Our method achieves 5.33x on average improvement in sample efficiency when compared to the traditional fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T22:38:20Z)
• Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models [116.25562358482962]
  State-of-the-art neural language models can be used to solve ad-hoc language tasks without the need for supervised training. PromptIDE allows users to experiment with prompt variations, visualize prompt performance, and iteratively optimize prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-16T17:17:53Z)
• Instance-wise Prompt Tuning for Pretrained Language Models [72.74916121511662]
  Instance-wise Prompt Tuning (IPT) is the first prompt learning paradigm that injects knowledge from the input data instances to the prompts. IPT significantly outperforms task-based prompt learning methods, and achieves comparable performance to conventional finetuning with only 0.5% - 1.5% of tuned parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T10:08:50Z)
• Prompt Injection: Parameterization of Fixed Inputs [15.85463693534699]
  Prompt Injection (PI) is a novel formulation of injecting the prompt into the parameters of an Language Models (LM) PI can be up to 280 times more efficient in terms of total FLOPs than previous approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T08:43:07Z)
• Instance-aware Prompt Learning for Language Understanding and Generation [49.22899822734549]
  We propose an instance-aware prompt learning method that learns a different prompt for each instance. Our method achieves the state-of-the-art on the SuperGLUE few-shot learning benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T17:03:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.