Moving beyond privacy and airspace safety: Guidelines for just drones in policing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04684v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:04:01 GMT
• Title: Moving beyond privacy and airspace safety: Guidelines for just drones in policing
• Authors: Mateusz Dolata, Gerhard Schwabe,
• Abstract summary: Police forces should consider the perception of bystanders and broader society to maximize drones' potential. This article examines the concerns expressed by members of the public during a field trial involving 52 test participants. We propose a catalogue of guidelines for just operation of drones to supplement the existing policy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of drones offers police forces potential gains in efficiency and safety. However, their use may also harm public perception of the police if drones are refused. Therefore, police forces should consider the perception of bystanders and broader society to maximize drones' potential. This article examines the concerns expressed by members of the public during a field trial involving 52 test participants. Analysis of the group interviews suggests that their worries go beyond airspace safety and privacy, broadly discussed in existing literature and regulations. The interpretation of the results indicates that the perceived justice of drone use is a significant factor in acceptance. Leveraging the concept of organizational justice and data collected, we propose a catalogue of guidelines for just operation of drones to supplement the existing policy. We present the organizational justice perspective as a framework to integrate the concerns of the public and bystanders into legal work. Finally, we discuss the relevance of justice for the legitimacy of the police's actions and provide implications for research and practice.

Related papers

• Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
  The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z)
• Obfuscated Location Disclosure for Remote ID Enabled Drones [57.66235862432006]
  We propose Obfuscated Location disclOsure for RID-enabled drones (OLO-RID) Instead of disclosing the actual drone's location, drones equipped with OLO-RID disclose a differentially private obfuscated location in a mobile scenario. OLO-RID also extends RID messages with encrypted location information, accessible only by authorized entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T12:35:49Z)
• Evidence of What, for Whom? The Socially Contested Role of Algorithmic Bias in a Predictive Policing Tool [0.9821874476902969]
  We show that stakeholders from different groups articulate diverse problem diagnoses of the tool's algorithmic bias. We find that stakeholders use evidence of algorithmic bias to reform the policies around police patrol allocation. We identify the implicit assumptions and scope of these varied uses of algorithmic bias as evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T13:03:33Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Security in Drones [0.0]
  It is important to establish both the cyber threats drone users face and security practices to combat those threats. Privacy will always be the main concern when using drones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T04:03:23Z)
• Chasing the Intruder: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Tracking Intruder Drones [0.08192907805418582]
  We propose a reinforcement learning based approach for identifying and tracking any intruder drone using a chaser drone. Our proposed solution uses computer vision techniques interleaved with the policy learning framework of reinforcement learning. The results show that the reinforcement learning based policy converges to identify and track the intruder drone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-10T16:31:40Z)
• Chat Control or Child Protection? [3.408452800179907]
  Debate on terrorism similarly needs to be grounded in the context in which young people are radicalised. The idea of using 'artificial intelligence' to replace police officers, social workers and teachers is just the sort of magical thinking that leads to bad policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T15:55:51Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• Drone swarm patrolling with uneven coverage requirements [22.475492500154573]
  In this paper, we focus on visual coverage optimization with drone-mounted camera sensors. We model these coverage requirements with relevance maps and propose a deep reinforcement learning algorithm to guide the swarm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T10:58:57Z)
• Dogfight: Detecting Drones from Drones Videos [58.158988162743825]
  This paper attempts to address the problem of drones detection from other flying drones variations. The erratic movement of the source and target drones, small size, arbitrary shape, large intensity, and occlusion make this problem quite challenging. To handle this, instead of using region-proposal based methods, we propose to use a two-stage segmentation-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T17:43:31Z)
• Blockchain-based Privacy Preservation for 5G-enabled Drone Communications [47.852641639155664]
  5G-enabled drones have potential applications in a variety of both military and civilian settings. There are security and privacy considerations underpinning 5G-enabled drone communications. We will review existing blockchain-based solutions after introducing the architecture for 5G-enabled drone communications and blockchain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T15:27:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.