MABR: A Multilayer Adversarial Bias Removal Approach Without Prior Bias Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05497v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:11:01 GMT
• Title: MABR: A Multilayer Adversarial Bias Removal Approach Without Prior Bias Knowledge
• Authors: Maxwell J. Yin, Boyu Wang, Charles Ling,
• Abstract summary: Models trained on real-world data often mirror and exacerbate existing social biases. We introduce a novel adversarial training strategy that operates independently of prior bias-type knowledge. Our method effectively reduces social biases without the need for demographic annotations.
• Score: 6.208151505901749
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Models trained on real-world data often mirror and exacerbate existing social biases. Traditional methods for mitigating these biases typically require prior knowledge of the specific biases to be addressed, such as gender or racial biases, and the social groups associated with each instance. In this paper, we introduce a novel adversarial training strategy that operates independently of prior bias-type knowledge and protected attribute labels. Our approach proactively identifies biases during model training by utilizing auxiliary models, which are trained concurrently by predicting the performance of the main model without relying on task labels. Additionally, we implement these auxiliary models at various levels of the feature maps of the main model, enabling the detection of a broader and more nuanced range of bias features. Through experiments on racial and gender biases in sentiment and occupation classification tasks, our method effectively reduces social biases without the need for demographic annotations. Moreover, our approach not only matches but often surpasses the efficacy of methods that require detailed demographic insights, marking a significant advancement in bias mitigation techniques.

Related papers

• DCAST: Diverse Class-Aware Self-Training Mitigates Selection Bias for Fairer Learning [0.0]
  bias unascribed to sensitive features is challenging to identify and typically goes undiagnosed. Strategies to mitigate unidentified bias and evaluate mitigation methods are crucially needed, yet remain underexplored. We introduce Diverse Class-Aware Self-Training (DCAST), model-agnostic mitigation aware of class-specific bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T09:26:19Z)
• Leveraging Prototypical Representations for Mitigating Social Bias without Demographic Information [50.29934517930506]
  DAFair is a novel approach to address social bias in language models. We leverage prototypical demographic texts and incorporate a regularization term during the fine-tuning process to mitigate bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:58:36Z)
• Improving Bias Mitigation through Bias Experts in Natural Language Understanding [10.363406065066538]
  We propose a new debiasing framework that introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model. Our proposed strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T16:15:00Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• Language Models Get a Gender Makeover: Mitigating Gender Bias with Few-Shot Data Interventions [50.67412723291881]
  Societal biases present in pre-trained large language models are a critical issue. We propose data intervention strategies as a powerful yet simple technique to reduce gender bias in pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T16:50:03Z)
• BLIND: Bias Removal With No Demographics [29.16221451643288]
  We introduce BLIND, a method for bias removal with no prior knowledge of the demographics in the dataset. While training a model on a downstream task, BLIND detects biased samples using an auxiliary model that predicts the main model's success, and down-weights those samples during the training process. Experiments with racial and gender biases in sentiment classification and occupation classification tasks demonstrate that BLIND mitigates social biases without relying on a costly demographic annotation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:59:42Z)
• Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training [60.0947291284978]
  Existing debiasing methods, such as adversarial training and removing protected information from representations, have been shown to reduce bias. We propose two novel training objectives which directly optimise for the widely-used criterion of it equal opportunity, and show that they are effective in reducing bias while maintaining high performance over two classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T01:57:58Z)
• Statistical discrimination in learning agents [64.78141757063142]
  Statistical discrimination emerges in agent policies as a function of both the bias in the training population and of agent architecture. We show that less discrimination emerges with agents that use recurrent neural networks, and when their training environment has less bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T18:28:57Z)
• Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Training Reweighting [58.201275105195485]
  Bias in natural language processing arises from models learning characteristics of the author such as gender and race. Existing methods for mitigating and measuring bias do not directly account for correlations between author demographics and linguistic variables. This paper introduces a very simple but highly effective method for countering bias using instance reweighting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T23:40:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.